jondrums said:I am consistantly frustrated with the stock reply to every thread that mentions aiming. THERE IS ONLY ONE AIM!!!!
I for one would be excited to learn more about the Hal's system, but all I ever hear is adversisements about how good it is, but never any real information.
Jon
I agree with KOOP!!!!Koop said:Have you called him? His number is all over this board and he charges nothing. Why should we put the information all over the internet when you can call him and get it from the horses mouth.
Not to mention, whenever anyone posts anything about his systems, the PhD's come out of the word work to poke holes in it. It just isn't worth arguing about. I will remain blissfully ignorant to all the equations that debunk his system while I continue to use it and see my game get better.
Regards,
Koop
Koop said:Have you called him? His number is all over this board and he charges nothing. Why should we put the information all over the internet when you can call him and get it from the horses mouth.
Not to mention, whenever anyone posts anything about his systems, the PhD's come out of the word work to poke holes in it. It just isn't worth arguing about. I will remain blissfully ignorant to all the equations that debunk his system while I continue to use it and see my game get better.
Regards,
Koop
Pushout said:Tap, tap, tap!! It's amazing the number of people who dis Hal's system and want to tell us why it works or why it doesn't but refuse to call him and talk to him about it. Or Stan.
I think a lot of people would be surprised, but they'd just rather drag it out in the forum.
Koop said:Yep, Stan would be another great one to call.
The question keeps coming up about how people who knows Hal's systems are cryptic about it and why. It makes me laugh because these people are constantly reminded that Hal is only a phone call away yet feel the need to show us how smart they are by putting up equations that NO ONE in the pool world could understand. I mean, can you imagine Reyes, Bustamante, Duell(sp), etc..looking at equations on this board and saying..."Yeah, that's how I do it!" They look at two points and pivot. That's it.
PKM said:So was bluepepper's earlier post accurate?
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showpost.php?p=1350243&postcount=22
jondrums said:I am consistantly frustrated with the stock reply to every thread that mentions aiming. THERE IS ONLY ONE AIM!!!!
I for one would be excited to learn more about the Hal's system, but all I ever hear is adversisements about how good it is, but never any real information.
I fear an aiming forum would quickly be overrun with this kind of noise.
I would very much like a special sub-section for technical billiards discussion!
Jon
Koop said:No it's not. There is one fatal flaw in his post and I would say, definitely the reason he is missing shots.
Jimmy M. said:I'm afraid to ask for fear of the "call Hal" answer, but it's much easier for me to ask here than to get away for a lengthy phone call while at work, so I'm going to ask ... what is the fatal flaw in his post?
Also, I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask or not but, with the multitude of aiming-system posts, I guess this is as good as any ... how do you aim combinations using a system?
Masirib5 said:How about that forum for questions and surveys like: "What is your favorite players shirt color?" or "If you felt younger - would you play better?"
But I guess that's what makes up a forum. People from all walks of pool life need to know something different to make them feel whole! Or are questions asked sometimes just to get your post numbers increased?
I guess I'm having a bad day!!!!
BRKNRUN said:I don't believe you just asked that?
I will tell you what...You teach me a method for better CB control and how to NOT to have a convulsion during the key shot in a rack...and I will show you a method how to aim combos.....![]()
(If you were really serious that is....which I doubt)![]()