Here's a question: best of 5 sets to 21. Player a wins the first 2 sets 21-15 and 21-11 Player be wins the next two sets 21-19 and 21-20 Player b wins the final set 21-17 for all the cash.
Player a won 98 games vs. 89 games total yet player b won the match.
Did the better player win?
Also if it was best of 5 sets and player A won the first 3 sets it would be over with no point to continue and TAR would have nothing to broadcast the final day. Perhaps that wouldn't be good.
I like the race to 100. We will see a 99-99 hill hill match one day and it will be a legendary safety battle.