The spectrum of opinion on this is pretty broad.
A few years ago I built 2 cues for a guy who liked very slim, light cues. A while later he found another cuemaker, very well known, who's work he liked also, and he wanted a cue made by this other guy, This cuemaker made only fat, heavy cues, which he didn't care for, so could I make him one similar to his but to my specs. I told him to see if the other cuemaker would make one to his (my) specs. The cuemaker said "sure", so he (my friend) had me measure one of the cues I had made and he gave these specs to the other cuemaker to use on a new cue.
The cuemaker had no problem with this because the specs (the weight and physical dimensions) were kind of "normal" and not really far from what he already was making, just a bit slimmer and a bit lighter.
Well, he made the cue and my friend liked it so much he ordered another one! They were very nice cues, and nicely reflected that cuemaker's style. No one would ever confuse them for anyone else's work.
A while later I had occasion to speak to this same cuemaker and after a bit of conversation I mentioned I had sent him a customer. He said enthusiastically "Oh yeah, that guy! Nice guy, but he sure does like his cues wimpy"! (that's the exact word he used, meaning slim and light)
So I told him he had built it to the specs I used for the guy's other cues which I had made..
Well, the guy absolutely threw a fit and swore he would NEVER make a cue to anyone's specs but his own. He was really pretty angry, as if he had been "tricked" somehow.
Now, this whole thing blew my mind because I absolutely could not see what the problem was since everyone loved the cues and thought they were some of that cuemaker's best work. "Wow! nice and slim. And light! Cool! Great hit!". On and on.
So this is just some more food for thought concerning how some artists (cuemakers) view their own work. I don't subscribe to that point of view, in fact, I don't get it at all, but it's out there. Fasten your seatbelt.
Go figure.
Robin Snyder