Analysis of Nevel vs Archer?

KoolKat9Lives

Taught 'em all I know
Silver Member
I think a # of us non-attending pool lovers would love to hear a couple attending AZBers take on how the match went. I guess the match took @ 5+ hours. It may have been a 10-O skunk but JA apparently missed an opportunity and Larry found his mojo and won the next 7.

When were each in dead stroke, points where a stroke so tight due to pressure, any classic lines, key points, atmosphere in the hall, any big name players watching, big sweat stories, fights...

Anyone care to paint the pic? Thanks! <passes the expresso>

Congrat's to JA and kudo's to both for putting it all out on the line!

Matt
 
Brain71 said:
Just got back from the Archer/Nevel match in Easley. Incredible, had alot of fun. 10 ahead for $10,000 lots of side bets going. Match didn't get started 'till 8:00. The place was crammed full, seating was shoulder to shoulder and really hot and sticky in the joint. Match was played on a brunswick with tight pockets. Couldn't fit two balls between the points. Johnny wins the lag and breaks and runs the first two. Breaks the third rack and misses a ball, Larry gets to the table and tries to lag a ball but doesn't hit a rail and gives Johnny ball in hand and goes up three ahead. Long story short, Johnny gets on the hill (9 ahead) in 90 minutes. Misses a key ball and Larry finally wins a game. Up until that point, Larry had only pocketed maybe 6 balls. It's now 8 ahead with Larry breaking and he makes the 10 on the break. Now 7 ahead and Larry breaks and runs the next two to come down to 5 ahead. Larry continues to win the next two games from easy 9 ball misses by Johnny and the next game they trade balls and it's now 2 ahead. Larry breaks and misses and Johnny wins to get back to 3 ahead. Johnny wins the next to get to 4 and then they trade games a couple of times going back and forth 'till Johnny comes alive and gets it up to 5 ahead. Johnny goes on from there to get back to the hill. Final game, Johnny breaks, makes the one and scratches. Leaving a tough out. Getting from the two to the three was perilous, with the three at the opposite end tied up with the six and seven ball. After a really long look at the table, makes the two, gets kind of bad on the three, tries to play safe off the three but ends up leaving Johnny straight in on the three without any tie ups on the rest of the balls and Johnny plays brilliantly and runs out the final game to win 10 ahead in almost 5 hours flat. Larry played good but looked out of sorts, kept getting really bad rolls and missing alot of key shots and really just not getting out when he should have. Worth the trip, had fun. Hope this helped.

This is the best one I've seen ^^^^
 
This was slightly inaccurate. Johnny did go up 9 and then made the 5 ball and scratched.(johnny up 8) Johnny then missed the 9 ball straight in to get back to the hill. Then larry made the 10 on the break. Long and short of it.......Both made a lot of mistakes but Larry never looked comfortable and Johnny got to playing well at the end. The nine ball was Johnny's downfall. He missed like 5 of them straight in. But he played well overall.
 
B_White said:
This was slightly inaccurate. Johnny did go up 9 and then made the 5 ball and scratched.(johnny up 8) Johnny then missed the 9 ball straight in to get back to the hill. Then larry made the 10 on the break. Long and short of it.......Both made a lot of mistakes but Larry never looked comfortable and Johnny got to playing well at the end. The nine ball was Johnny's downfall. He missed like 5 of them straight in. But he played well overall.
How was Johnny's pace during the match? He's had a reputation for slow play lately and I was wondering how he played in this money match.
 
Might be on the sacastic side, but he got to 9 ahead pretty quick so he couldn't have been playing too slow. after larry ground him back to +2 he might have slowed up a bit.
 
SCCues said:
How was Johnny's pace during the match? He's had a reputation for slow play lately and I was wondering how he played in this money match.




His pace was very deliberate. You could call it slow but I think that it was definitely not intended to affect Larry, I just think that is Johnny's natural pace.
 
Rift said:
Might be on the sacastic side, but he got to 9 ahead pretty quick so he couldn't have been playing too slow. after larry ground him back to +2 he might have slowed up a bit.

9 games in 90 minutes = 10 minutes per game = 1 minute per ball.

That IS slow.

In tournaments the majority of players normally use around 5-6 minutes in average per rack in 9-ball.
 
Roy Steffensen said:
9 games in 90 minutes = 10 minutes per game = 1 minute per ball.

That IS slow.

In tournaments the majority of players normally use around 5-6 minutes in average per rack in 9-ball.

From one of Larrys' posts---> "We are playing on a tight Gold Crown 3. Extended rails 4 1/16 in pockets". That should explain the slow pace and the fact that Johnny hung a few balls.

Saw
 
Back
Top