Another one of those posts that make you cringe but here goes: idea for game variation

So in 14.1, I am about to break open the rack on a break shot and I have to call my next shot????

Seems to be tough call. Or do you eliminate the rule on opening break shots?
Each rack is a reset. Shoot the break ball, then if you make it, you call the next two balls.
 
We played it 60 years ago. The local record was 17. Only the next ball had to be called, not the pocket. I think it's a good way to show someone they don't have any precise position. I wonder if Mosconi or Eufemia ever tried it.

So they called the break ball and the next off the stack?


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
Here's an idea for a pool game with modified rules. It probably works best with 14.1 but can be applied to 8-ball as well.

It's call pocket with a twist. You have to call your NEXT shot, too, not just the ball you're shooting. To get started, you call the pocket on the first ball of your turn, and the next ball. Miss your OB and your inning is over. Make your ball and you shoot again, but you have to shoot it in the pocket you called prior. Miss or make it in a different pocket, and the ball comes up and your turn is over.

At the end of the rack or end of an inning, of course, you start over; next turn at the table you call two shots.

All other rules are the usual you're accustomed to playing under.


Hard to find something new in this old world. I heard tell that Artie Bodendorfer delighted in getting people into games having to call one or even two balls ahead decades ago.

Hu
 
I got a great idea for you guys that feel you need to invent new games……
MASTER THE ONES WE ALREADY PLAY FIRST

Gotta admit you have a point! One of the great things about pool, we never master it, or at most for a fleeting moment. We can play seemingly brilliantly one day and come back the next day and play like we have never seen a pool cue before. Never mastering pool is one of the major appeals. We don't even master other players other than for the moment. Next time you meet it might be their night to shine!

Hu
 
The value in restrictive rulesets is the opportunity for evolution. It can narrow the focus on details that would otherwise atrophy. It's not about mastering the games so much as liberating your mind to navigate new thought structures. The added headroom alone can justify the time taken away from practicing your break :D
 
9-ball is all about making the 9-ball….thinking nine shots ahead is what it’s all about.

I'm trying to figure out how to encourage people to make the plan before they ever bend over, then execute. One of the hardest things in any form of physical competition is to get that chattering verbal brain to shut up!

If the entire inning is nine balls we need a plan to make nine balls before we shoot at the first one. The verbal mind can have it's turn if we blow the pattern, we will have to stop and rebuild it. However, adding another ball after you shoot one for that rolling three ball plan is requiring an interruption after every shot. I just pocketed a ball and put the cue ball where I want it. I don't need a loudmouth between my ears interrupting my run. That is even worse than having an external coach!

I had a friend that liked to coach after he had a beer or three. I should have told him to shut up, instead I just nodded my head and agreed and kept running my pattern. A girl watching noticed I wasn't following the coach's advice which was always to shoot the easiest shot without regard as to how it would affect the rest of the pattern. She said, "You aren't following a bit of his advice!" I held up one finger, "Ah, now you get it." His name was Hugh too so I had two Hu's rattling around between my ears when I was trying to shoot!

A simple bit of advice that you can work on anywhere, including while on the company clock, is just to train the conscious verbal mind to shut the hell up! When you can shut it down for five or ten minutes you are in great shape to run a table, or sit through another meeting in the conference room where they are going to tell you what to do. That thing you knocked out last week!

Aside from anything else, a truly quiet mind is knocking on one of the doors to the third level zone where you can perform on the ragged edge of maximum ability.

Hu
 
Last edited:
I got a great idea for you guys that feel you need to invent new games……
MASTER THE ONES WE ALREADY PLAY FIRST
So you’re saying that Efren ppaying 3C was a bad idea towards his uncanny vision of CB paths in 9-ball or 1P. Or that 14.1 won’t help 8-ball pattern play or fine CB positioning. Or 1P won’t help learning strategy or banking.

Much like playing various games can increase skills for ALL games, alternate rules for existing games definitely can accelerate acquiring skills spanning many games we already play, no?
 
It would make 8 ball a more skilled game.

Could you imagine if we played nine ball like 8 ball. Hit any ball you want in any order but the nine is last. I'd string 10 racks
 
Last time that a so-called 'new game' had any traction at all was that lame made-4-tv 7ball crap. The games we play now have stood the test of time and nothing 'new' i've seen has been anything more than a practice routine. CJ's "Shoot or Dare" looks somewhat interesting but that's the only one i've seen that comes close to having a chance at becoming 'slightly' mainstream.
 
Great 10 ball match between Van Boening and Antonis Brabin,
.
They were calling 'ball and pocket'. 9 ball on the break doesn't win. Helps to reduce slop. My kind of game.
 
So you’re saying that Efren ppaying 3C was a bad idea towards his uncanny vision of CB paths in 9-ball or 1P. Or that 14.1 won’t help 8-ball pattern play or fine CB positioning. Or 1P won’t help learning strategy or banking.

Much like playing various games can increase skills for ALL games, alternate rules for existing games definitely can accelerate acquiring skills spanning many games we already play, no?
Not sure how you got your response out of what I said. I play a lot of games….what I learn from one enhances the others.
I don’t need a bunch of Mickey Mouse new rules to learn something….if I have trouble in an area, I shoot it til I own it.
 
So they called the break ball and the next off the stack?
Yes. It's often not hard to guess the next ball. One of the two corner balls or one of the two head balls in the 14-ball rack. In our form of the game you didn't need to call the pocket. I have a friend who asked me to make sure certain balls were tight in the rack because he planned to play a particular ball into the side pocket for his next shot. Some people plan that sort of thing. I'm pretty sure Eufemia did.
 
Here's an idea for a pool game with modified rules. It probably works best with 14.1 but can be applied to 8-ball as well.

It's call pocket with a twist. You have to call your NEXT shot, too, not just the ball you're shooting. To get started, you call the pocket on the first ball of your turn, and the next ball. Miss your OB and your inning is over. Make your ball and you shoot again, but you have to shoot it in the pocket you called prior. Miss or make it in a different pocket, and the ball comes up and your turn is over.

At the end of the rack or end of an inning, of course, you start over; next turn at the table you call two shots.

All other rules are the usual you're accustomed to playing under.
Like Bob Jewett said, we played it years ago.
 
Last time that a so-called 'new game' had any traction at all was that lame made-4-tv 7ball crap. The games we play now have stood the test of time and nothing 'new' i've seen has been anything more than a practice routine. CJ's "Shoot or Dare" looks somewhat interesting but that's the only one i've seen that comes close to having a chance at becoming 'slightly' mainstream.
I just checked Shoot or Dare and it's relatively new! I expected it to be much older, for some reason.

My thoughts:
+ the initial push out gives every player a chance each rack
- I don't really get why a ball must touch the pocket zone to be legal. Either way: it can lead to discussion.

In the end it seems like a simple version of 9-ball, with a push out after the break. So i'm sceptical that this will be very big. I do appreciate the creativity.

 
Last edited:
Promoting billiards to new customers could be worth trying.

Pool was once favored by West Point and the White House.

If a sitting DC politician organized a pool league would it be worth talking about?

Pool events are in locations of interest to current events. Even major networks might have correspondence in those areas.

The story of pool players in Europe. Can ESPN get that on ABC?
 
Back
Top