Anybody see this insanity?

[SBC]

2.8K views · 15 reactions | What is your ruling? Match over? Dry things up and replace and shoot? What do you think? | Cue It Up Network

What is your ruling? Match over? Dry things up and replace and shoot? What do you think?

www.facebook.com

I assume the opponent conceded.

 

[pt109]

I’ve seen it before….I’m still wondering what happened to the guy who threw the bottle.

 

[bbb]

split the prize money....

 

[straightline]

Legit answer: Do the formality. Reset the shot and shoot it.
Anything else is comedy.

 

[Bob Jewett]

... I assume the opponent conceded.

EDIT: It seems that the ruling was done correctly. The table was cleaned and the position reset. There was no replay. No information about any horsewhipping.

Someone said that the last rack was replayed. If that was the ruling the ref needs to be horsewhipped along with the beer waster.

 

[iusedtoberich]

It's an act of god. The balls should be repotted as close as possible. Only the CB moved, and they had a video, so it should be pretty easy to replace.

And/or, the opponent could concede since it was an easy shot, just to make it faster and easier on everyone.

 

[Nick B]

It's an act of god. The balls should be repotted as close as possible. Only the CB moved, and they had a video, so it should be pretty easy to replace.

And/or, the opponent could concede since it was an easy shot, just to make it faster and easier on everyone.

For that kind of money...nothing is easy.

 

[Double-Dave]

It's an act of god. The balls should be repotted as close as possible. Only the CB moved, and they had a video, so it should be pretty easy to replace.

And/or, the opponent could concede since it was an easy shot, just to make it faster and easier on everyone.

Actually both of these happened.

The rule is to replace the shot, which the ref did after drying the cloth which obviously took a while.
When that was done the other side had allready left and effectively conceded, so he didn't have to take the shot anymore. The money was paid out.

 

[straightline]

Who was the thrower? What did he lose?

 

[Bob Jewett]

... When that was done the other side had already left and effectively conceded, so he didn't have to take the shot anymore. The money was paid out.

Good to know. Where did this take place? And was the money real?

 

[SBC]

Someone said that the last rack was replayed. If that was the ruling the ref needs to be horsewhipped along with the beer waster.

Guy who threw the beer was in the opponents camp. I'd be ashamed. Besides the player was out....

 

[SBC]

Good to know. Where did this take place? And was the money real?

Australia I believe.

 

[jasonlaus]

Who was the thrower? What did he lose?

Hopefully teeth

 

[Greg M]

Good to know. Where did this take place? And was the money real?

Took place in Braintree in Essex, England. The prize money of £180,000 was absolutely real - the match must have had some backers.

 

[straightline]

I'm going with the winner actually choked and the thrower was from the future saving his world from destruction.

 

[L.S. Dennis]

2.8K views · 15 reactions | What is your ruling? Match over? Dry things up and replace and shoot? What do you think? | Cue It Up Network

What is your ruling? Match over? Dry things up and replace and shoot? What do you think?

www.facebook.com

I assume the opponent conceded.

Maybe the guy was upset because the beer he ordered was something other than is favorite IPA!

 

[Z-Nole]

For one split second I wished I had Facebook so I could see this, but thankfully the moment passed.

 

[straightline]

This one plays without login.

 

[pt109]

I’d like the rest of the story.
Was he the stake horse and that was his way of conceding?
…if not, did he get his lights punched out?
….dId he get barred for life?