So true, in this situation now. Getting better only has reward when playing for money, not APA.
What ??? There is money in amateur pool ? Shhh....dont tell the pros...they will start sandbagging to get back to the amateur level.
So true, in this situation now. Getting better only has reward when playing for money, not APA.
IMHO the biggest problem with APA is not the LO but rather the team players and captains that do not mark score cards correctly. Intentional safeties are often marked incorrectly as a missed shot. A skilled player is able to rearrange the furniture without penalty when this happens, thus leading to accusations of "Sand Bagging". When the team works as a team and helps the scorekeeper by watching for infractions or deliberate safeties, it improves the experience for all players. There will always be those that try to "one up" on officials, but if they are caught and called on it, they will eventually quit.....have their skill level increased.....or be thrown off the league for unsportsman like conduct. Play your best.....do your part....and enjoy the experience.....Dan
Not sure how all APA leagues run. Not sure what it takes for one team to win their way to Vegas opposed to another APA league. Just curious how some players can play for 20 years and never win their way to Vegas. While it appears it's a yearly vacation for other. I mean what are the odds of winning a trip to Vegas between different APA leagues and should there be a level playing field.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
IMHO the biggest problem with APA is not the LO but rather the team players and captains that do not mark score cards correctly. Intentional safeties are often marked incorrectly as a missed shot. .....Dan
I've seen players call impossible shots so it would get marked as a miss.
Umm, no. There's actual math involved.
So who on each team keeps score?
A lot of it is just a crock, the LO will raise people simply because it would look to obvious that the player is not a 7 or 8 if there wining every week, but will rate others high so that their buds that are a true 5 to 7 can keep winning by being given half a rack of wild balls and the guy they rated at a 9 but should be a 7 will never get a chance at making it to the money, it sucks but they don't care they figure that if you don't like it you can go somewhere else and play.
This is an example of a “symptom” that I hear quite a bit, as readers/posters on this
website I think we all do. I’m sure there are are some LO’s that lack the necessary
conviction to be LO’s and maintain their position and business the way it was meant to
be maintained. On the other side of that same coin there are some that are really good
at what they do and have earned the praise and respect of their customers/clientele.
I think that if people with a similar opinion to Ron Padilla stop to consider this for a
moment, they might find that unless their APA area less than 20 or 30 players, altering
this system and skill levels would be more trouble than it’s worth. When you gather that
most APA areas have multi-hundreds of players, no one player is so important that the
LO would on a weekly basis devote the necessary time to go in and change scores,
skill levels, stats, etc... I’m not saying that doesn’t happen, but I don’t believe it happens to
the extent that some here would claim. When you have teams playing every night of the week,
paperwork involved, data entry, and whatever else is involved, there just isn’t
the time. I mean, what a pain in the ass it would be to constantly take time to manipulate
the numbers of a few players that are probably doing nothing in return, why do it at all.