theoneandonly said:
I said it once and ill say it again around my parts sandbagging is everything. Two weeks ago I played against my league reps team. I played the league rep myself. Anyway I am a 6 in the 8ball standings. The rep is a 5. He played safety after safety against me. I played maybe 3 safties total in the match. I end up spanking him and what does he do? At the end of the night I go to sign the scoresheet and see that he has marked me down for 9 defensive shots. The fat loser marked me down with 9 defensive shots because i beat him. WE were playing on a 7 footers too. I said something to him right there and he backed up his marks on the sheet. I know that some regular apa players make false markups, but the league rep did it. I have a problem with that. I play in the apa to have fun once a week with my friends. I try not to take it too serious since it is all bullshit anyway. I just think the APA is sandbagging heaven and you are rewarded most of the time for doing so.
You're a bit all over the map. First you're talking about sandbagging (but give no examples of anyone playing below their level), then you're talking about safeties, then you're talking about scorekeeping, then you try to sum it up as sandbagging (but still no example of playing below level).
Cheating may be a more accurate representation of what you're trying to express. As has been stated, unfortunately cheating is always a part of human nature. But sometimes human nature also, too easily accuses someone else of cheating, even when they're not.
Sometimes it's very difficult to know for sure, until you gather all the information - i.e. hearing both sides of the story for starters, and any other corroborating points of views. Even this, is not always 100% accurate.
Sometimes people just want to gripe, no matter what the actual facts are. That's way too common amongst some humans. Usually they suffer the effects of those ills in all their life, so in essence they make their own destiny.
Now, without having any understanding of what actually happened in your event, there are some explanations that would be rational based on what you've relayed.
For example, if the scorekeeper saw shots taken where there was no intention on making a ball, then it is legitimate to mark it as a safety. Even if the shooter had no intention of trying to leave it difficult or hook their opponent. Not intending to make a shot, would be marked as a defensive.
Information that would also be noteworthy in your scenario, is when those defensive shots were marked. If they were marked during the course of each game, then odds are they were legitimate. If, as you imply, they were marked down, only after it was plain to see that you were the victor, then that would be cheating, and should be rectified by someone able to handle complaints to the appropriate people (LO in this case) in a rationale manner. Hotheads would often prefer to be right about being mad, than to actually resolve the situation. Cooler heads can create positive resolution to such issues.