Its all in the thread about the new board members for the wpba but I tell ya..
Mark Griffen (sp) the Bcalp, Csi owner puts his name in the hat for a spot on the board of the wpba. The Apa writes a letter to the Wpba telling them if they vote him on the board they will pull their sponsership.
so lets assume its not petty for them to not use Diamond tables because he has a stake in that and they say there is a conflict of interest, wich is what ? making pool as good as it can be. If sombody thinks them writing a letter to a 3rd party threatening them is ok Im in the wrong game. That, by no stretch is right.
I dont know much but I do know Mark G. has done tons for pool and would be a great addition to any company / org. that wanted to move the game forward.
That action not only shows the apas true colors but is a slap in the face to every player on the tour. Its not whats good for the game/ tour its what the apa thinks might not be good for them. Like Marks first move would be to in anyway do somthing to pissoff one of the tours biggest sponsers.
Who does the Wpba they they are this guy,
Like this guy said can we just get along?,
Last edited: