Tiger Emerald tips are an excellent more-durable and more-consistent substitute
I've always been an Elkmaster fan, and this was my tip of choice until recently (well, the past year) when my cuemaker friend -- that does all my tips and cue work, and knows my preferences well -- suggested I try the
Tiger Emerald. The Tiger Emerald is a layered tip to be sure, and prior to this, I was not a layered tip fan by any stretch of the imagination. (I dislike layered tips as a general rule.)
However, after trying the Tiger Emerald -- which, interestingly, is "supposedly" a medium tip -- I loved it. Has the "soft grippy feel" of an Elkmaster, but doesn't compress as often, and lasts a lot longer. My cuemaker friend says that he doesn't go through the issue of "good or bad tips in the box" like he does with Elkmasters, either. Every Tiger Emerald tip in the box is good, and he hasn't had a "bad" one yet after a couple years of installing them.
One thing, though -- being a layered tip, you can't be as aggressive in shaping a Tiger Emerald as with a single-layer tip like the Elkmaster. I use the
CueShark, with a spinning motion, as this is less likely to grab the edges of the layers (which would otherwise cause the tip to delaminate). If you use a tool that shapes with lateral cutting motion (e.g. like a mill file, or the
Sandman, or the
Extreme tip tool, or the standard
"half pipe" tool that you insert a strip of sandpaper into), you have to be EXTREMELY CAREFUL, otherwise the tool will grab the edges of the layers, and you can cause the tip to delaminate. (You have to start from the very center of the tip, at the top/peak, and sand/file *towards* the edges.)
Anyway, I didn't mean to sidetrack this thread about inconsistency with Elkmasters with a tome about another type/brand of tip, but I thought my comparative experience of it with Elkmasters would be helpful.
-Sean