I agree, if you don't use refs at an event like this, when would you use them.CrownCityCorey said:How can anything be considered a "World Championships" without a ref is beyond me.
I agree, if you don't use refs at an event like this, when would you use them.CrownCityCorey said:How can anything be considered a "World Championships" without a ref is beyond me.
SUPERSTAR said:So I can only think that either he fouled unknowingly if he did, or that it never happened and it was a shark move on Stevie's part.
This all being after he had conceded 1 foul to Stevie earlier in the match, and his being EXTRA AWARE of the rules.
Kind of makes me suspicious, but then again, I am ALWAYS suspicious.
Steve Lipsky said:They use refs, just not in the round robin.
Smorgass Bored said:That makes me wonder what would have happened if the table hadn't been in a 'favorable' position for Bob M.
Would Stevie have called the foul if the balls were in an untenable state ?
Would he have called the same foul to his detriment ?
Doug
cuetable said:just guessing here on my own here
10 ref X $20 /hr X 8 hours X 6 days = $9600
Williebetmore said:Steve,
Actually, penalties occur in golf quite occasionally without the player's knowledge. If a ball moves after you address it, it is a penalty (though occasionally the player is looking away and does not see it). There have even been instances of a television camera seeing it (and the player didn't), viewers call in, and the player would appropriately add the appropriate penalty stroke before posting his scorecard.
Obviously a player can't call it if he doesn't see it; and in the above instances no one thought the player was cheating.
cuetable said:just guessing on my own here
10 ref X $20 /hr X 8 hours X 6 days = $9600
And then they also think about costs for tex/outfits, training, food, lodging, etc...
At Roseland NYC in 2000 there was a great volunteer program for ref/score keepers, partly helped by tournament director Arthur Rosen (great guy).
Instead of being critical on an ongoing event which can't be changed much immediately, perhaps we can organize some suggestions to help the event for the next year?
let's make progress together...
And, if he signs the scorecard with the incorrect score on it, he is disqualified from the tournament.memikey said:Willie.......just for the record, golf rules are actually quite harsh in those circumstances![]()
A golfer who moves the ball without knowing it and only finds out about that via tv viewers after having already played his next shot would actually have to add 3 shots to his score on that hole, not 1 shot![]()
When his ball moves he incurs a 1 shot penalty. If he then plays the ball without replacing it to where it moved from, he incurs a further 2 shot penalty for playing it from the wrong place![]()
Steve Lipsky said:I cannot describe how important I think this tournament is to the overall health of 14.1. Dragon, Randy, and Joel are doing a wonderful thing!
- Steve
Steve Lipsky said:These numbers would be more realistic:
10 refs x $10/hr x 14 hours x 4 days = $5,600
You wouldn't have to pay them $20 per hour, you need them for more than 8 hours per day, but you'd really only need most of them for the first 4 days.
However, I agree with your main point - this is an incredible tournament. The addition of the refs for the round robin would be nice but in no way necessary.
I cannot describe how important I think this tournament is to the overall health of 14.1. Dragon, Randy, and Joel are doing a wonderful thing!
- Steve
Voodoo Daddy said:I would have ref'd for a hotel room for the week...whats wrong with that?
What in fact was the foul?????SUPERSTAR said:Did anyone in attendance happen to catch the argument that happened between Bob Maidhof and Stevie Moore.
Apparently, from what i was told, Stevie called a foul on Bob as Bob was about to run out the game.
Apparently, it was the second foul called by Moore. The first, resulted in Bob saying "I don't think i fouled, but if you think i fouled, then go ahead" show of sportsmanship.
Apparently, Bob was on a big comeback, and with only a couple balls left before the breakshot to what would have been his runout, when Stevie called another foul, which Bob didn't believe, seeing as there were only a couple of balls left on the table.
Apparently, Bob and Stevie disagreed, and Bob broke down his cue telling Stevie that if that's what he needed to do to win, then go ahead.
Obviously, i'm wondering about referees (if there are any) and their role in the championship, but i am also wondering if any spectators were present who actually saw what happened, who might shed some light on the truth of the matter.
Did Bob foul?
Or was it a shark/move by Stevie?
stick8 said:What in fact was the foul?????![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
stick8 said:What in fact was the foul?????![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
memikey said:Willie.......just for the record, golf rules are actually quite harsh in those circumstances![]()
A golfer who moves the ball without knowing it and only finds out about that via tv viewers after having already played his next shot would actually have to add 3 shots to his score on that hole, not 1 shot![]()
When his ball moves he incurs a 1 shot penalty. If he then plays the ball without replacing it to where it moved from, he incurs a further 2 shot penalty for playing it from the wrong place![]()
SUPERSTAR said:Well, i can't fault Bob's integrity at the table.
Several years ago, we were at a 9ball tournament in Lancaster PA, and Bob was playing Jose Garcia, and i was playing Jimmy Fusco 2 tables away.
During that match, Bob committed a foul, and Jose didn't see it and Bob called the foul on himself and gave up ball in hand, which COST him the match.
So i can only think that either he fouled unknowingly if he did, or that it never happened and it was a shark move on Stevie's part.
This all being after he had conceded 1 foul to Stevie earlier in the match, and his being EXTRA AWARE of the rules.
Kind of makes me suspicious, but then again, i am ALWAYS suspicious.
I wrote an article full of suggestions last year. There were lots of comments last year. I'm very glad to see the event taking place, and I'm spending something like $1800 to see the last two days, but it really would be nice if some of the suggestions here and elsewhere were implemented next year.cuetable said:... Instead of being critical on an ongoing event which can't be changed much immediately, perhaps we can organize some suggestions to help the event for the next year? ...