For people who don't like math and physics (i.e., probably most people in the world), my October '06 article might be more interesting and readable.jsp said:I find it surprising that any experienced player is not aware that you get more throw on a cut shot with a stunned CB compared to a naturally rolling CB. (EDIT...there was once a time where I thought the opposite was true, and it is documented somewhere in this forum, but I was no where near an "experienced" player then...nor do I really consider myself an "experienced" player now.)
Anyway, let me link you to one of Dr. Dave's most informative papers...
http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~dga/pool/technical_proofs/new/TP_A-28.pdf
Compare the graphs with PEr = 0% (sliding CB) with the graphs with PEr = 100% (fully rolling CB).
Regards,
Dave