hemicudas said:
SJM, you have a great point, sir. Yes, I believe Keith and Ronnie made more money than Larry and Mike on the road. Keith related a story about a time in CA when Larry and Mike tryed matching up with him on the bar box and neither Larry or Mike cared for it at all, both getting weight. I watched Keith drill Mike in Baton Rouge on the big table, just after Mike had won 6 or 7 tournaments in a row. Not saying, Keith was the favorite, just that he had/has more heart than, Mike or Larry.
As far as pure money making ability, AKA, Hustle, Larry and Mike had no personality for it. Larry was as quiet as a mouse and Mike didn't talk much more. How in the hell can you shut Keith and Ronnie up, even now, LOL?
As far as playing ability in general, yea, Larry and Mike were very close.
I asked Keith about Larry Hubbert and Mike Sigel playing him when they were on the road, and he said it happened at a place called "Nero's" in California. He had been playing poker for about 30 hours or more, and in the bar walks in Mike and Larry, looking to Earthquake for a little action. At that time, many road players and champions came to California gunning for Keith because he was instant action, had no fear, and would play for high stakes.
A friend in the bar went to the card room and told Keith that they were there looking for him. So he packed up his poker chips and went on over to see what was happening. Mike Sigel was in the peak of his career, and Keith said he wasn't afraid of ANYBODY at that time. So him and Mike matched up on the bar table there at Nero's, 7-ahead sets playing 9-ball, even. Keith won two sets for 3 dimes each, and then Larry Hubbert stepped up to the plate and wanted a chance to get their money back, but he wanted a spot. Keith gave Larry the wild 8 on the bar table and went through him like water going through a sift. After Keith beat Larry Hubbert, Larry and Mike went to Oklahoma City, and Larry beat David Matlock, even, for the money.
And IMHO, it's kind of difficult to compare players like Buddy Hall with pool players in today's world. For one thing, the action is nowhere near as good as it was in Buddy's heyday. I will guarantee you that any of today's players wouldn't fare too well playing the Buddy Hall that I know from the '70s. Even today, Buddy Hall still packs a mean punch on a field of green, and none of these young up-and-coming stars would have had a chance playing even with Buddy Hall when he was at the height of his career.
At a couple of U.S. Opens ago, Cliff Joyner had a backer with him and wanted to play Keith some one-hole, 4-ahead for a couple of dimes, spotting him 10 to 7. I didn't like the game at all and didn't want to move forward with it for my dough. I mean, surely there was softer action in the joint than Cliff Joyner. However, at Keith's insistance, he prevailed and off they went. The crowd at Q-Master's surrounded their table, and it truly was standing room only. After a couple of games that went back and forth, it was even, and Cliff's backers pulled up, not liking what they saw on the table.
Moral of the story, it's not how well you play being on the road, but how well you match up, and it is essential to have knowledge of all games as well as an awareness of your opponent's capabilities. The rest is pure guts.
Keith beat a guy out of 360,000 nuggets in Las Vegas one time, which is the biggest money game I've ever heard of. I don't think there will ever be that kind of action again in today's tournament-inclined pool world.
JAM