BHQ said:thanks guys
nothing quite like free publicity![]()
next time i get one of those old brunswicks ,
just might be a price hike
vicdotcom said:Thats going to happen a lot. Its a freedom in America last I heard. Its along the lines of "if you dont like the way I do business then get the heck out of my bar". It might not be the way you do business but its still allowed.
He might not have liked the way you offered him a low offer. TO ME that might be construed as offensive. Personally I would rather sell a cue to someone I liked rather than someone who offended me trying to low-ball or nickel and dime me causing more work in counteroffers and counters to the counter offer etc.
Vic
BHQ said:can you wait a year???![]()
JohnPT said:mr. bishop if you wanted the cue so bad you should have met the price posted in the first place and not make low offers. i PM'd the lowered price to all who inquired in the order they inquired. masonh was the first to respond and yes he did beat you by a minute.
masonh, he wants the cue real bad. even offered me extra to retract my sale to you as long as i keep it between me and him. nice guy.
anyhow, cue is sold to masonh. it'll ship in before noon today. thank you.
cueaddicts said:Nice summation.
Wow, I can't believe I just saw this thread. From experience I can tell you this....as a seller if you try to him-haw around with a lowballer when you've got mucho action on an obvious GOOD DEAL, more often not you end up the loser. You want people to "pony up the cash", "shit or get off the pot", etc.
When you are the buyer and you see something you want, sometimes you've got to step up to the plate. I've lost out on many a good buy for the same reason. Oh well, we all live an learn....
wow, i feel specialJohnPT said:everybody agrees the cue at the price was a steal yet you consider your $150 offer for a practically new BHQ as being fair? not a lowball huh! you're looking more stupid with each post. I'm done here.