Bill Rowsey’s “ALL THE BALLS” One Pocket Tournament Guidelines

charley2

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Bill Rowsey’s “ALL THE BALLS” One Pocket Tournament Guidelines

On November 5th, 2021, the Southaven, Mississippi REC hosted a onepocket.org members tournament where I spoke with former establishment owner, Bill Rowsey. Bill gave me permission to use his name in the title and shared with me his very successful method for hosting extended duration one pocket tournaments. I want to share this with other players, poolroom owners, and spectators.

If you have input or questions about this type of tournament, perhaps the input and questions could be entered/answered in these forum threads.

The many BENEFITS for poolroom owners, players, and spectators are listed:
*The joy/challenge of playing one pocket.
*The excitement of one pocket tournaments.
*Competition.
*Owners benefit by players practicing to ready themselves for their matches.
*Owners can have 1-3 or even 4 of these tournaments per year.
*Observers/customers come to the pool room to watch matches.
*Tournament winnings and calcutta can be in the thousands of dollars.
*Positive advertisement for poolroom owners.
*Others.

Setting up the Tournaments
*Tournament takes 2 to 4 months to complete; 16 or 32 players.
*Sign-up and draw is similar to other tournaments, players meeting, calcutta, etc.
*Players have 14 days to complete their match from the time match is set. If they do not finish within 14 days (this could be 10 days) culprit player loses match (see problems/solutions below).
*Double elimination but could be single.
*Entry fee can be whatever the poolroom owner wants it to be-$50 to $150 is common. Added money is common, but not necessary.
*A team of 3-5 pool players/poolroom owner determines each player’s handicap. The team sets handicaps considering the player’s “best playing abilities”, i.e., the player is playing his/her best.
*Each player is handicapped from 15 to 90/100. Top Pros would be 80 to 100 (maybe somewhat less?). Imagine Efren, Alex, Tony, matching up against a very capable strong player who is handicapped for example 55.
*Players are given a list of each player’s phone number so they can communicate and set their match dates/times.

Matches
*Flip/alternate breaks.
*Race to handicap.
*Shoot all 15 balls, not 8. When last ball is pocketed, incoming breaker continues.
*Object ball fouls, ball on the break, other rules can be determined by poolroom owner/team.

Players not completing their match with in the 14 day time limit. It is recommended this not be tolerated, AT ALL. According to Bill this was a significant problem. The culprits were usually the same 1 to 3 people. Please do not allow these 1 to 3 players detour you from having these tournaments. Please see Pareto’s 80/20 Rule-used in management as 80% of management problems come from 20% of the employees.
SOLUTION-As a former manager, I believe poolroom owners/teams need to be very, very, tough on these culprits. If a match is not completed within time allotted, a loss is given. No exceptions/no favoritism. Similar to employment, I recommend the only rational excuse/reason would be a VALIDATED death in the immediate family or proof of being in a hospital, (possible other rational reason). Documented proof must be given to owner/team. I know this sounds harsh but these 1 to 3 players slow up the tournament process and can be aggravating for other players, owners, and spectators.

Written by Lanny Charles-Chicago/Memphis 11/18/21
 
Each player is handicapped from 15 to 90/100. Top Pros would be 80 to 100 (maybe somewhat less?). Imagine Efren, Alex, Tony, matching up against a very capable strong player who is handicapped for example 55.
*Players are given a list of each player’s phone number so they can communicate and set their match dates/times.

Matches
*Flip/alternate breaks.
*Race to handicap.
*Shoot all 15 balls, not 8. When last ball is pocketed, incoming breaker continues.
*Object ball fouls, ball on the break, other rules can be determined by poolroom owner/team.
Beyond HIGHlarious.

Writer takes presumptuous position that 80:20 must be defined for his readers...and fails to mention how the fooookin handicaps impact game play or how scoring works.

TQM!!!!
 
Beyond HIGHlarious.

Writer takes presumptuous position that 80:20 must be defined for his readers...and fails to mention how the fooookin handicaps impact game play or how scoring works.

TQM!!!!
I would guess 80% of the readers do not know what Pareto’s 80/20 Rule is and 20% probably do? Thanks for communicating with kindness.
 
I would guess 80% of the readers do not know what Pareto’s 80/20 Rule is and 20% probably do? Thanks for communicating with kindness.
I guess it dependss on how one defines 'readers', but I think far more than 20% of the esteemed AZB gang is familiar with 80:20.

Any input on how the handicaps are used would be relevant.
 
... I think far more than 20% of the esteemed AZB gang is familiar with 80:20. ...
I'll bet the over, but in general concept form and not involving the name "Pareto" or the word "outcomes". And anyway, it's 10% of the tournament/league players that cause 90% of the problems. ;)

As for the format above, it's interesting. Around here there is (or was until recently) a handicapped one pocket league. The players organized their matches on their own in each round. I suppose the tournament format could be run at the same time as the league and might bring new players into the league. The league requires more commitment.

I agree about the "play or get out" rule, but how do you decide which player is the foot-dragger? One solution I've thought of is to have a "standard" day of the week for matches and if the match is late for any reason, the match must be played on that day.
 
Any input on how the handicaps are used would be relevant.
I don't know for sure but it sounds like the idea is you play 1 very long game.
You don't stop at 8, but just keep playing; after the last ball of a rack is pocketed, you rack them all up again and keep going. First player to get to their handicap wins. (E.g. a couple lukewarm players might go something like 40 vs 25 to keep it under 3 hours.)

I've played that way once or twice before, but gambling; $10/ball and you just keep going until somebody quits. (Not getting into whether that needs to be the guy losing!)
 
I don't know for sure but it sounds like the idea is you play 1 very long game.
You don't stop at 8, but just keep playing; after the last ball of a rack is pocketed, you rack them all up again and keep going. First player to get to their handicap wins. (E.g. a couple lukewarm players might go something like 40 vs 25 to keep it under 3 hours.)

I've played that way once or twice before, but gambling; $10/ball and you just keep going until somebody quits. (Not getting into whether that needs to be the guy losing!)
I believe your gameplay conclusion is accurate.
 
I'll bet the over, but in general concept form and not involving the name "Pareto" or the word "outcomes". And anyway, it's 10% of the tournament/league players that cause 90% of the problems. ;)

As for the format above, it's interesting. Around here there is (or was until recently) a handicapped one pocket league. The players organized their matches on their own in each round. I suppose the tournament format could be run at the same time as the league and might bring new players into the league. The league requires more commitment.

I agree about the "play or get out" rule, but how do you decide which player is the foot-dragger? One solution I've thought of is to have a "standard" day of the week for matches and if the match is late for any reason, the match must be played on that day.
Based on your you, 99% chance you are more than half right and the other half can be a 1%er.
 
Back
Top