I've often wondered how players would PLAY if they DIDN'T KNOW what game they were on in a race or "WHAT" their opponent did during their last shot.
For example...race to 7:
You break and do whatever...you are then "isolated" and have "no knowledge" of what happened until it is YOUR turn at the table again. If/when you miss or play a safety, you are isolated again until it is back to you.
Would a player play more "offensively" or more "defensively" if they didn't know if they were ONE shot behind or five racks behind?
This would FORCE the player to play as though EVERY SHOT was their LAST shot of the game.
Of course time may give the players an "idea" of what materialized during their absence from the table, but they would have NO assurity that they were correct in their assumption.
For example...race to 7:
You break and do whatever...you are then "isolated" and have "no knowledge" of what happened until it is YOUR turn at the table again. If/when you miss or play a safety, you are isolated again until it is back to you.
Would a player play more "offensively" or more "defensively" if they didn't know if they were ONE shot behind or five racks behind?
This would FORCE the player to play as though EVERY SHOT was their LAST shot of the game.
Of course time may give the players an "idea" of what materialized during their absence from the table, but they would have NO assurity that they were correct in their assumption.
Last edited: