Little help, please?
Older valley table, tight tape 80 x 40" nose to nose
Call for suggestions
Okay, and I just took a road trip to measure some tables. I found an older Valley table that measures 74" nose-to-nose. So you're right, one_rope, we have a problem to solve.
I'm still pretty confident that, with the rare exception of custom or "bargain bin" off-brand tables, 8-foot tables and above are pretty well standardized, but having learned what I just learned, I'm calling this into question as well.
I don't think many home users will mind measuring their table length-wise, nose-to-nose to make sure they get the best results. But if you're out and about, we would like to provide some means of measuring a table that doesn't require a tape measure, but is still very accurate.
To this end, we are actively looking for a solution to the problem of measuring a table. I think there are some clever solutions available and I know there are some clever people here, so if you have ideas, let's hear them! If we use your idea, you'll get your name in lights in the About box of all versions of Break Speed that use your idea.
To get the creative juices flowing, here are a few options we've discussed amongst ourselves...
Provide a custom printable template. Simply lay it on the side rail and use it to measure the distance between the diamonds - the template will tell you the length of the table, nose-to-nose, based on the distance between the diamonds. On my 9-foot table, a standard 8x11 sheet of paper will not quite reach both diamonds, but folding the paper diagonally will (with enough room to spare for the printable area of the paper.) This can be folded up and placed in your cue case. This is currently our favorite idea. It's simple and most people have access to a printer either at home or at work. We will also need to make sure that people don't "shrink to fit" the template when printing, in order to provide the best accuracy.
Take an overhead picture of the cue-ball on the rail with the nearest two diamonds in view, and auto-detect the position & size of the ball and diamonds. We threw this idea out almost immediately because not all devices have a camera (read: iPod Touch).
Using measurement references: allow the user to measure the distance between diamonds relative to a row of balls. Line up a series of balls along the rail from diamond-to-diamond and provide an interface to allow the user to duplicate that relationship on-screen. We're not keen on this one because there is too much inaccuracy here (on my table, there is a 5" distance from a diamond and the inside of the rail, which makes it very hard to judge.) Other options were dollar bills (they aren't all the same size unless they're fresh, also too hard to judge when they don't land exactly on a diamond), quarters (few people will carry that many quarters with them), chalk cubes (another availability and standardized size issue), etc.
So far, the paper template provides the most accurate results. Top THAT! (please)
