Buddy Hall still can play

jungledude

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
:p Even though he's about 60 and now down about 50 pounds from his 350 lb. high, Buddy Hall was unbelievable this weekend in New Orleans winning the Sports Center's nine ball tournament by double dipping Mike Black in the finals.
2. Mike Black 3. Erman Bullard 4. Ricky Power
Sure wish Jam and Keith would pay us a visit some time soon in New Orleans....
 
jungledude said:
:p Even though he's about 60 and now down about 50 pounds from his 350 lb. high, Buddy Hall was unbelievable this weekend in New Orleans winning the Sports Center's nine ball tournament by double dipping Mike Black in the finals.
2. Mike Black 3. Erman Bullard 4. Ricky Power
Sure wish Jam and Keith would pay us a visit some time soon in New Orleans....

Shows how good my sources are! Ricky P. was on the phone with Keith and said Erman came in second (LOL). :p

He did say Buddy was looking GREAT, AND plans on hanging out in New Orleans for a week or so. :D

JAM
 
jungledude said:
:p Even though he's about 60 and now down about 50 pounds from his 350 lb. high, Buddy Hall was unbelievable this weekend in New Orleans winning the Sports Center's nine ball tournament by double dipping Mike Black in the finals.

Nice to hear, and testament to the fact that as long as your eyesight and/or nerves don't let you down, you can last a long time if you have the talent and are a truly great technician. Buddy's excellence at 60 reminds me of two other players who remained superstars of the game into their 60's, Irving Crane and Joe Balsis. Nick Varner's staying power over the years has been simlarly inspirational. All of a sudden, I'm feeling pretty young at 46. Is this great or what?
 
You are so right

sjm said:
Nice to hear, and testament to the fact that as long as your eyesight and/or nerves don't let you down, you can last a long time if you have the talent and are a truly great technician. Buddy's excellence at 60 reminds me of two other players who remained superstars of the game into their 60's, Irving Crane and Joe Balsis. Nick Varner's staying power over the years has been simlarly inspirational. All of a sudden, I'm feeling pretty young at 46. Is this great or what?

That is great and your great but dang, you didn't mention me. lol
But I am only "tecnically a player"
 
Buddy Hall Aint A Buddy To Pool

Yea Buddy Is No Hero To Pool After What He Pulled At The Casino..betting Against Hiself When They Had The Paramutal On Billiards...now There Are No Tournaments In Alot Of Casinos Because Of That...thanks Buddy Your Really Good For The Sport
 
jungledude said:
:p Even though he's about 60 and now down about 50 pounds from his 350 lb. high, Buddy Hall was unbelievable this weekend in New Orleans winning the Sports Center's nine ball tournament by double dipping Mike Black in the finals.
That's good to hear. When I saw Buddy at Grady's tournament in Gulfport in December, he looked like he weighed more than 350, and he seemed out of breath at the end of every match.

Mike
 
He has been coming over to Stroker's in Palm Harbor lately. Played in the Wednesday tournament. Don't know how he placed.

I've also seen him at Planet 9-Ball in Tampa. I should ask him to play sometime ;).
 
Who Ever Said Buddy Couldn't Still Play ???

IMO - Buddy at 80% could defeat 95% of all pool players today. As good as Efren is now, he doesn’t play 9 Ball with the consistency and perfection that Buddy played for about 4 years in Shreveport in '70's. Efren's cue ball is magic all right but that is what differentiates him from Buddy at his peek. Buddy could put an opponent to sleep because everything looked soooo easy. Every shot was perfectly in line.

TY & GL
 
OldHasBeen said:
IMO - Buddy at 80% could defeat 95% of all pool players today. As good as Efren is now, he doesn’t play 9 Ball with the consistency and perfection that Buddy played for about 4 years in Shreveport in '70's. Efren's cue ball is magic all right but that is what differentiates him from Buddy at his peek. Buddy could put an opponent to sleep because everything looked soooo easy. Every shot was perfectly in line.

TY & GL

No truer words were ever spoken, Tom. The best 9 ball ever played over any time period was done by Buddy Hall in Shreveport. Just try to find someone who took that cash off. They all took a shot but absolutely no one got there. You can ask, Keith, Mike, Jimmy, Greg if he were still with us, or any other top player of the day. Hell, Buddy gave, Louie Roberts the 7 ball and made him eat it.

I am very glad, Buddy is doing well and hope he continues to lose weight and win tournaments.
 
Is there any video footage of Buddy in his prime? I think many (most?) will agree that his cueball is simply the best in the business.

I saw a clip of one of his matches (against Mika at DCC I believe). He had a table-length shot that was almost straight, barely any angle and the next object ball down by the cueball; he couldn't go forward or draw back, and everyone thought he was going to roll a safety...he walked around, moaned a little, got lined up, and just pounded the cueball into the rail and punched/spun it back 7 feet. It was amazing, I've never seen such an effortless stroke, smooth as butter...

Anyway, is there any footage of his younger days? I would love to see him in his prime...

-Roger
 
buddha162 said:
Is there any video footage of Buddy in his prime? I think many (most?) will agree that his cueball is simply the best in the business.

Best position player of all time:a) 9-Ball, Buddy Hall, b) Straight Pool, Willie Mosconi. I've never really had any idea how one might approach picking one over the other.
 
OldHasBeen said:
IMO - Buddy at 80% could defeat 95% of all pool players today. As good as Efren is now, he doesn’t play 9 Ball with the consistency and perfection that Buddy played for about 4 years in Shreveport in '70's. Efren's cue ball is magic all right but that is what differentiates him from Buddy at his peek. Buddy could put an opponent to sleep because everything looked soooo easy. Every shot was perfectly in line.

TY & GL

That guy can't play! He never takes a hard shot! :rolleyes:

-piga
 
OldHasBeen said:
IMO - Buddy at 80% could defeat 95% of all pool players today. As good as Efren is now, he doesn’t play 9 Ball with the consistency and perfection that Buddy played for about 4 years in Shreveport in '70's. Efren's cue ball is magic all right but that is what differentiates him from Buddy at his peek. Buddy could put an opponent to sleep because everything looked soooo easy. Every shot was perfectly in line.

TY & GL

But look at Efren's consistency ever since he came to the united states. You are talking about a 4 year span of perfect 9-ball, Efren has a span of decades with high finishes in 95% of the tournaments he plays in, if he doesn't snap them off.

Every great pool player has had their heyday. There was a period of time when Mike Sigel was winning everything, then there was Nick Varner, Buddy Hall, you name it. Look what's happening to Kid Delicious.

Efren's never had a prime, he has continued to play great with consistency for decades.

Buddy Hall can still play, absoloutely, look at his high finishes in these tournaments recently. Every top player out there has had a period when he was nearly unbeatable, except for Efren. Efren is the only player, quite possibly in the world, who can beat 95% of the top players in the world when he is struggling. He's got the moves, and I'm sure Buddy does too. But Efren's performance at DCC shows what he's made of, even in his older age, he is still the world's greatest pool player to ever grace the planet. I'll take Efren over any of the all time greats as the favorite, no doubt in my mind. When I hear people who have been around pool for 30-40 years, they speak of Efren in the same fashion- nobody can accomplish what he has accomplished, and continued to accomplish.

Buddy hall in a similar fashion, yet a 4 year period of dead punch doesn't compare much to a man who for the past few decades is often capable of shooting a 1000.

I've hear stories of Buddy and Efren matching up, something along the lines up Efren saying "Buddy you never meeeess" or something like that, and shortly thereafter, Buddy became a witness to the greatness of Efren.

Pool is the type of the game where you can lose without participating in a match. Just because Buddy kept people in their chairs the entire set, doesn't mean that it hasn't happened to him. What Efren is known for is, hence the name the "magician" is coming with unbelievable shots, sometimes not even for the run out, but for mere control of the table.

There is no human being on this planet who can beat Efren on a consistent basis. The man's a genius at the table. Of course Buddy is too, but I think Efren is a better player than Buddy, even when Buddy was in his prime, IMHO. By the way, I'm a young guy who wasn't around to see Buddy in his prime, but I've heard multiple accounts, from guys who have been around pool for nearly half a century. They all painted a pretty clear picture- Efren would have beaten Mosconi at any game, even if it were 14.1, had Efren dedicated time to practic and learn the game. He's the most talented cueist on the planet, IMHO.
 
I just love to watch Buddy play. He has a tremendous stroke that is mesmerizing to watch. I wish I could have seen him play in Shreveport during that 4-year period!!

I don't know whether Efren is/was/or ever will be better than Buddy or not. The thing that I like about Efren is his attitude and his endurance. That guy can play all day in a tournament, gamble half the evening in the casino and then play for cash all night and then win the tournament the next day. During the whole time, his attitude at the table couldn't be better. I've never seen or heard of him getting out of line or even exhibiting a little bit of anger.

Back to Buddy - there was a thread some time ago that talked about Buddy challenging all the Pinoys and anyone else for the cash and no one wanted any. At his prime, it seems conclusive that he was the "MAN" when it came to 9B.
 
LastTwo said:
But look at Efren's consistency ever since he came to the united states. You are talking about a 4 year span of perfect 9-ball, Efren has a span of decades with high finishes in 95% of the tournaments he plays in, if he doesn't snap them off.

Every great pool player has had their heyday. There was a period of time when Mike Sigel was winning everything, then there was Nick Varner, Buddy Hall, you name it. Look what's happening to Kid Delicious.

Efren's never had a prime, he has continued to play great with consistency for decades.

Buddy Hall can still play, absoloutely, look at his high finishes in these tournaments recently. Every top player out there has had a period when he was nearly unbeatable, except for Efren. Efren is the only player, quite possibly in the world, who can beat 95% of the top players in the world when he is struggling. He's got the moves, and I'm sure Buddy does too. But Efren's performance at DCC shows what he's made of, even in his older age, he is still the world's greatest pool player to ever grace the planet. I'll take Efren over any of the all time greats as the favorite, no doubt in my mind. When I hear people who have been around pool for 30-40 years, they speak of Efren in the same fashion- nobody can accomplish what he has accomplished, and continued to accomplish.

Buddy hall in a similar fashion, yet a 4 year period of dead punch doesn't compare much to a man who for the past few decades is often capable of shooting a 1000.

I've hear stories of Buddy and Efren matching up, something along the lines up Efren saying "Buddy you never meeeess" or something like that, and shortly thereafter, Buddy became a witness to the greatness of Efren.

Pool is the type of the game where you can lose without participating in a match. Just because Buddy kept people in their chairs the entire set, doesn't mean that it hasn't happened to him. What Efren is known for is, hence the name the "magician" is coming with unbelievable shots, sometimes not even for the run out, but for mere control of the table.

There is no human being on this planet who can beat Efren on a consistent basis. The man's a genius at the table. Of course Buddy is too, but I think Efren is a better player than Buddy, even when Buddy was in his prime, IMHO. By the way, I'm a young guy who wasn't around to see Buddy in his prime, but I've heard multiple accounts, from guys who have been around pool for nearly half a century. They all painted a pretty clear picture- Efren would have beaten Mosconi at any game, even if it were 14.1, had Efren dedicated time to practic and learn the game. He's the most talented cueist on the planet, IMHO.


I have to laugh when people say Efren is the greatest
cueist of all time. I mean no disrespect to Efren,
I think he's an amazing player and probably the best
all-around pool player right now. However, 50 years
from now when people look at the record books they'll
see Earl's 6 world Championships and 5 U.S. Opens,
Mike Sigel and Steve Mizerak's numerous titles,
and they'll see Efren's name but not nearly as
often as the others. To say he was better than
Mosconi is ridiculous, he won 15 World Titles! He
dominated he game for almpst his entire career,
Reyes hasn't dominated anything. Even saying
he's the greatest Cueist in the world is a bold
statement; Blomdahl the 6 or 7 time billiard
champion also won the European Masters 9 ball title,
How many players have ever won major titles in
more than one cue-sport? In fact I have a tape of
Blomdahl and Reyes playing 3-cushion and 9-ball and
Blomdahl wins both games handily.
Then there's Stephen Hendry in snooker with 7
World Titles! Or the legendary Walter Lindrum who
not only dominated English Billiards but eventually
got so good he had to spot all the other top players
7,000 pts in championship play!
Again, I don't mean to put Reyes down, he is a
great player, but not a dominant one.
 
Last edited:
Bobby said:
I have to laugh when people say Efren is the greatest
cueist of all time. I mean no disrespect to Efren,
I think he's an amazing player and probably the best
all-around pool player right now. However, 50 years
from now when people look at the record books they'll
see Earl's 6 world Championships and 5 U.S. Opens,
Mike Sigel and Steve Mizerak's numerous titles,
and they'll see Efren's name but not nearly as
often as the others. To say he was better than
Mosconi is ridiculous, he won 15 World Titles! He
dominated he game for almpst his entire career,
Reyes hasn't dominated anything. Even saying
he's the greatest Cueist in the world is a bold
statement; Blomdahl the 6 or 7 time billiard
champion also won the European Masters 9 ball title,
How many players have ever won major titles in
more than one cue-sport? In fact I have a tape of
Blomdahl and Reyes playing 3-cushion and 9-ball and
Blomdahl wins both games handily.
Then there's Stephen Hendry in snooker with 7
World Titles! Or the legendary Walter Lindrum who
not only dominated English Billiards but eventually
got so good he had to spot all the other top players
7,000 pts in championship play!
Again, I don't mean to put Reyes down, he is a
great player, but not a dominant one.

Do you ever think that there will be a dominant player such as Mosconi? I really think that the competition is better now than at any time in history. Would Mosconi have won 15 world titles in this era? Not taking anything away from Masconi because he did do it but I do not think that it can be the only comparison. I for one do not think that you will ever see domination like you did in the past and it is not because the players today do not measure up.
 
Comparing Mosconi and Efren is pointless in my opinion. Its just like comparing babe ruth and barry bonds. You just cant do it. All we have is numbers and titles...which really dont mean a whole hell of a lot in pool. Day in and Day out, i would bet on Efren over just about anyone that comes to mind. If buddy and efren played some nine ball TODAY, i would back efren. None of us can truly compare peoples primes versus other peoples primes when they came at seperate times. I can easily compare Barry Bonds and Sammy Sosa because their primes were similar just like I can compare Mika and Marcus Chamat (for example). You might as well forget comparing all these old timers with the younger players of today and even comparing the old timers with Keith, Buddy, and Efren. No one is right and no one is wrong. There is simply to many unknown variables at play.

just my opinion
 
Here is what I said & Why I said it.

(IMO) (IMO) (IMO) (IMO) (IMO) (IMO) (IMO) (IMO)
"As good as Efren is now, he doesn’t play 9 Ball with the consistency and perfection that Buddy played for about 4 years in Shreveport in '70's. Efren's cue ball is magic all right but that is what differentiates him from Buddy at his peek. Buddy could put an opponent to sleep because everything looked soooo easy. Every shot was perfectly in line".

In other words - I have watched Buddy's game progress throughout the years starting form our Johnston City Days when we were both 19 years old. I just recently studied Efren game @ the DCC & I was truly amazed. I honestly think (and have said right here) that Efren is playing One Pocket at a different level than anyone has ever played it before.

But, But, But - (IMO)
Buddy At his peek would have & could have beaten Efren at 9 Ball.


Remember the story I told on here about Hubbard & Siegel going to play Buddy? Larry had told me (after 9 hours of play) that Mike had played perfect pool. NO MISTAKES - 0, ZIP, NADA.
I said - GREAT - How do you stand - He said - "We're 3 games stuck"!!!

TY & GL
 
Back in the late 70s maybe 80 I watched Buddy play in Akron aginst Earl that my friends was the best match I have ever witnessed. Buddy's cue ball control was unbelieveable. I never seen Buddy play in the south but I seen him at what I thought was his best. But Earl took him in the end. Earl was unbeatable by anyone at that time. Ahhhh the good old days. Thanks for opening my mind to great memories.
 
OldHasBeen said:
(IMO) (IMO) (IMO) (IMO) TY & GL


Hey Tom,

I love to hear your thoughts, as well as stuff from other people that lived it and were there.

Just to throw out another thought, Efren and Buddy aren't too far apart in age. They were both "working the road" around within 10 years of each other and played alot of the same guys. IMO, it would have been a stone cold pick em between Buddy and Efren (in 9 ball). One story that comes to mind is the one about Efren when he made his tourney debut at teh '85 Red's Houston open where he was running thru champion after champion. I don't think anyone got to the hill against him and that is no small feat considering the field. After the tourney, after Efren just ran thru the field, people were lining up to play him and from what I heard, the results were the same.

JMHO, when you get down to "who would win", when the only difference can be literally one roll or two in the whole damn session, I would think you'd be better off flipping for the bankroll :p


Eric
 
Last edited:
Back
Top