He's a beast I injoy watching him play
What happen to Shane? I thought he's the best... He wins all the time at the US open...
i was disappointed as shane is one of the best 10-ball player in this planet, and he let the opportunity pass.
No, exactly what are you getting at?Carlo is ranked #1 by WPA Points. My teammate is an SL2 and was once the #1 ranked player in the NOLA APA North Shore Division. See what I'm getting at?
No, exactly what are you getting at?
Seeing Biado ranked #1 by WPA Points means that Biado participated in numerous international events that included the top international fields, and he finished very high in many of them, giving him more points than any other player in the world over the past year.
That's exactly my point. Why would you be disappointed in Shane for winning an event that he had a good opportunity to win, instead of going to an event with tough competition for "points." You go where the money is, not for your name on a leader board.
That's exactly my point. Why would you be disappointed in Shane for winning an event that he had a good opportunity to win, instead of going to an event with tough competition for "points." You go where the money is, not for your name on a leader board.
How much did Shane win at the USBTC? Ko Pin Yi pocketed 40k for his win. Purely from a money stand point, Shane should have been in the Phillipines.
Correct - the rankings don't mean a damn thing and the sanctioning is a joke.
Purely from a money stand point, any tournament is a gamble. Shane had better odds winning at the USBTC and it was held in the states. Which from a money standpoint, staying in the country is a lesser expense.
Carlo is the WPA #1 ranked player... Cool...
Shane pulled off his third consecutive USBTC 9-ball win. That's cool-er.
Some people just don't get it![]()
I find it interesting to read all of the threads about it being a joke for pros to play on bar tables. Like the tables are beneath them but when Shane wins then it is "cool-er".
It seems as if a tournament or ranking system is only credible if Shane wins or is #1 in the rankings..
What happen to Shane? I thought he's the best... He wins all the time at the US open...
I find it interesting to read all of the threads about it being a joke for pros to play on bar tables. Like the tables are beneath them but when Shane wins then it is "cool-er".
It seems as if a tournament or ranking system is only credible if Shane wins or is #1 in the rankings..
It's a joke, no matter who wins it.
Maybe I misunderstood your point, but you bringing up your SL2 teammate certainly came off as downplaying Biado's ability/accomplishments.That's exactly my point. Why would you be disappointed in Shane for winning an event that he had a good opportunity to win, instead of going to an event with tough competition for "points." You go where the money is, not for your name on a leader board.
The rankings are what they are calculated to determine. It shows who has succeeded in the major international competitions. It's as best an objective ranking system our game could determine. You look at the top 10 players on the list and you think they don't mean a damn thing?Correct - the rankings don't mean a damn thing...