Congrats OMGWTF

Congratulations Melinda. From reading these threads, it looks like you did well!

Also looks like the wing needs a splint.:D
 
Last edited:
Congratulations OMGWTF

It seems like everyone got a lot of enjoyment out of this match! I look forward to the next woofing session that turns into a real match.

Who's next?

It ain't gonna be me but I can spectate with the best of them. :D :D
 
i dont shake hands with many people that I have gambled with over the years-unless they are friends or someone approaches me. Its action not sportsmanship.
 
Poolplaya9 said:
There were people on here that were stupid enough to bet up to $500 on cubc without knowing how either of the players played. Anyone with that level of stupidity deserves to lose their money IMO.
las vegas is full of stupid people but they keep coming back. and since no one knew how either played is actually a 50/50 chance, definately better odds than any casino thay i have ever been to gives you. i dont care how good and smart you play. 500 may sound like a lot of money but to some people its really not.
 
props to both players for showing up and putting on a show. congrats to the lady for winning. i enjoyed watching the match because it wasnt the usual tv type match where the better player runs rack after rack. it keep me on my seat the way a football game does.;)
 
Johnnyt said:
No class for not shaking hands...give me a break. Their not friends and don't like each other. He had just as much chance to shake her hand as she did his. Most of the ones that say she has no class for not are the ones that were for him or bet on him. Do I smell sour grapes? Johnnyt
You're absolutely correct. After she won and was celebrating and getting congrats, he never looked her way and walked out the door. How can anyone question her class for not shaking his hand? He walked out the door.

Fred
 
Poolplaya9 said:
It is not like blackjack because in blackjack you are able to maintain some control of the odds by using skill, and if you are playing smart you will be betting when you think the odds favor you.

A better ananogy for betting on this match without knowing how either player played would be like betting on a coin flip. My opinion is still the same. When you are betting large amounts, it's a dumb bet when there are so many other better bets out there to be had. It could be considered all relative, which is why I clearly said it was just my opinion.


When did $500 become a large amount?
 
Shed some light

8 ahead for $3k, but in the end for $500 each. She broke 5 money balls???
Who was racking? Gee, when they break a spotted ball, you move the darn thing where they won't do it again. (like to the back of the rack).

Cubc probably won't show his keystrokes for awhile, crow goes down hard.
 
Snapshot9 said:
8 ahead for $3k, but in the end for $500 each. She broke 5 money balls???
Who was racking? Gee, when they break a spotted ball, you move the darn thing where they won't do it again. (like to the back of the rack).

Cubc probably won't show his keystrokes for awhile, crow goes down hard.

They each posted 3k - the $500 was the amount of some side bets that some were trying to get down. I haven't counted (and won't) but I htink that besides Corvette there were several others who bet a hundred on this match - so total on the side in AZ land was probably around $1000.

She did break in five money balls throughout the 3 hour set, but I think that 3 of them were 9 balls. The set however went back and forth many times and CUBC was up 3 games at one point and up 2 games several times.

Rack your own and being allowed to place the money ball is a joke. I have never played that way but I have played that the money ball must be called on the break.

The thing is that OMGWTF has a great break - she was bound to get some action off of that break. It doesn't show a lot of gambling experience to allow the opponent to rack their own and place the money ball.

As for shaking hands well now that I think about it I don't shake hands after gambling sessions either. You are trying to get in the other person's pocket and they in yours. It's not friendly and it's not a random match like in a tournament.

Maybe people have the idea that since this was a prearranged match and it was broadcast that it should be more formal. It's not. This is not an exhibition, it's gambling between two people who put their "own" money up to play. This is the fundamental difference between TAR and the IPT - the IPT puts up 5k and tells two players to play an exhibition match for it. Basically both players are backed by the same person. TAR sets up the venue for two players to go head to head for their own or their backer's money. It's more raw and real.

No handshake - no big deal. Beating your online arch enemy in an online broadcast match for 3k - priceless.
 
JB Cases said:
They each posted 3k - the $500 was the amount of some side bets that some were trying to get down. I haven't counted (and won't) but I htink that besides Corvette there were several others who bet a hundred on this match - so total on the side in AZ land was probably around $1000.

She did break in five money balls throughout the 3 hour set, but I think that 3 of them were 9 balls. The set however went back and forth many times and CUBC was up 3 games at one point and up 2 games several times.

Rack your own and being allowed to place the money ball is a joke. I have never played that way but I have played that the money ball must be called on the break.

The thing is that OMGWTF has a great break - she was bound to get some action off of that break. It doesn't show a lot of gambling experience to allow the opponent to rack their own and place the money ball.

As for shaking hands well now that I think about it I don't shake hands after gambling sessions either. You are trying to get in the other person's pocket and they in yours. It's not friendly and it's not a random match like in a tournament.

Maybe people have the idea that since this was a prearranged match and it was broadcast that it should be more formal. It's not. This is not an exhibition, it's gambling between two people who put their "own" money up to play. This is the fundamental difference between TAR and the IPT - the IPT puts up 5k and tells two players to play an exhibition match for it. Basically both players are backed by the same person. TAR sets up the venue for two players to go head to head for their own or their backer's money. It's more raw and real.

No handshake - no big deal. Beating your online arch enemy in an online broadcast match for 3k - priceless.

I agree John. The handshake thing really isn't that big a deal. It was no secret that these two disliked each other and there is nothing wrong with that. As long as the match was civil, and it was, I see nothing wrong with a continuation of the rivalry if you will. People are making a bigger deal about the non-handshake than they should.
 
I just got finished reading the whole thread about the challenge, which is now closed on AZ, on OMGWTFs blog....pretty funny stuff.

Southpaw
 
poolhall maven said:
I have to disagree about the hand shake. This wasn't a tournament where the players are expected to be good sports. This was gambling.
I have seen players play for the same amount of money for 10 ahead and believe me, there was no shaking of hands after that match was over.
In fact has anybody seen two people shaking hands after a gambling match???

I have...lots of times.
 
Back
Top