Day 2 Stream Schedule
Stream Links
Stream Links
Thanks for that. Yes, I recall Bader's Cinderella run last year for silver. Still, Mike Page's analysis, that says that this format doesn't really randomize the results at all, seems to hold up. Per Mike, each match is, statistically, like a ten-ball race to eight, which is usually long enough to bring the cream to the top. To their credit, these events are producing very worthy champions.Wu Kun Lin won the second event last year. I don't know what his FargoRate was prior to that event, but today it is just a hair under 800 at 798.
Zielinski and He are now just a bit over 800 (803 and 804, respectively), but I don't know what their ratings were just before their wins in this series. A trip back through AzB threads from the time of those events could probably tell us, but no need, as your point is certainly valid that only top-notch players have won in this series.
The lowest-rated player to have made the finals in one of these events is Bader Al Awadhi, currently at 759, which puts him out of the top 100.
You are absolutely right that I read the bracket's walkover players incorrectly. I'm clearly not a math major. My mistake.I just saw that you also said 42 in another thread as well. It is 74 for the men (76 entrants but two forfeits) and 64 for the women. And the men's field includes a couple dozen very good players. Did you look at post #1 of this thread or at the bracket?
You are correct, I was wrong in how I read the walkovers in my haste. Don't worry, I have no interest in watching races to 4.A. you're wrong. again B. don't watch it.
Another perspective is this event last year had 51 players, and this year it has 74.sad to see they didn't fill the field. i hope it's lesson learned this time. still fun to see chang, gorst, shaw play in any format
just look at the brackets. the euro's are here because of all the big events on tap: American 14.1, Int'lOpen and US Open are all coming up soon.What Americans participating in this event? Seems strange that an event in MI attracts higher level talent from EU than the USA.
What Americans participating in this event? Seems strange that an event in MI attracts higher level talent from EU than the USA.
Yeah, it's not like Calgary and Edmonton, AB isn't a hour and a half away...Unlike the Alberta, Canada event, this one isn't in a remote location. I've never been to Battle Creek, but it looks to be only a couple hours from a few major cities. Too bad it didn't fill. The stands are empty also from what I can tell on the stream.
Yeah, it's not like Calgary and Edmonton, AB isn't a hour and a half away...
The truth is, no one in this area wanted to play the format.
Yeah, less bullets flying aroundThat's a bit different than the Chicago and Detroit metro areas, but your answer seems to be why location doesn't matter too much.
This event is called the Michigan Open. Chicago is a different state. Next month, these players will be back for the Ohio Open and another chance at $25K first prize.If you want to fill the seats move that tournament from Battle Creek to Chicago.
CSI/Predator have two other Pro events in the same area. The Wisconsin Open was just held earlier in February this year, and next month we have the Ohio Open. All 64 spots for the Ohio open are filled. If these tournaments didn't draw out the players , why would CSI/Predator host 3 tournaments in the region. To me, it's successful.Another perspective is this event last year had 51 players, and this year it has 74.
CSI/Predator have two other Pro events in the same area. The Wisconsin Open was just held earlier in February this year, and next month we have the Ohio Open. All 64 spots for the Ohio open are filled. If these tournaments didn't draw out the players , why would CSI/Predator host 3 tournaments in the region. To me, it's successful.