CTE and TOI

Status
Not open for further replies.
By "automatically" John means "by feel gained through practice". It's the special language used to tell the CTE Legend.

pj
chgo

Exactly!

And when John points out that Stevie and Landon are capable of making every shot using pro one he is proving my point.

My point I was making in the other thread is that pro one or cte is a method that relies on the subconscious mind to put you in position to make the shots. The subconscious needs to be studied by anyone who does not understand how it works. Anyone can find plenty of information on the web or in a library.

Here is some food for thought. If all cuts to the right executed with pro one only have 5 visuals X 2 ways to pivot to take you exactly to "center ball," (as if center ball is one position), then there would be exactly 10 contact points capable between the cue ball and object ball. 5 x 2 equals 10 and 10 lines of aim are hardly enough to make every cut to the right.

The truth is, everytime you move your head to the left or right the position of center ball changes, there is no one center ball when you are sweeping into the shot from an angle. The multitude of ut shots can be made with pro one bacause the mind makes minute adjustments in your body on the way down into the shot to try to align where you land correctly. The subconscious is miraculous in its ability to complete tasks like this, but it will make errors for new users along the way to being programmed for consistant success.

Let me make this clear. I believe Pro one can be used successfully after many hours of programming. I know, Many of you users will claim that you use it effectively right now, but what I mean is that it will be able to be used like Landon uses it. It will take time for the subconscious to learn to position your body that consistantly though. My claim about dropping straight into the shot being better still stands. There is less variables to compute when your head and other bady parts are already on the line, therefore less programming for the sub, therefor great consistancy will come much faster.

I think the reason so many new users like cte is because it is the first time they have experienced letting the subconscious do the real aiming. Before they were trying to consciously check to see if their parrallel system was matched up correctly once they were down on the shot, or they were making adjustments once they were down because it did not look like they were lined up to hit the ghost ball, or to create a half ball hit, or whatever. Everything was done consciously with conscious adjustments once they were down and now that they have a system that uses the subconscious they see more success. I do believe that even faster and greater success can be learned with a system that starts them off on the line of the shot. They just have to remember to trust their sub did its job once they drop into the shot and then pull the trigger.
 
Last edited:
Exactly!

And, John when points out that Stevie and Landon are capable of making every shot using pro one he is proving my point.

My point I was making in the other thread is that pro one or cte is a method that relies on the subconscious mind to put you in position to make the shots. The subconscious needs to be studied by anyone who does not understand how it works. Anyone can find plenty of information on the web or in a library.

Here is some food for thought. If all cuts to the right executed with pro one only have 5 visuals and 2 pivots that take you exactly to "center ball," (as if center ball is one position), then there would be exactly 10 contact points capable between the cue ball and object ball.

The truth is, everytime you move your head to the left or right the position of center ball changes, there is no one center ball when you are sweeping into the shot from an angle. The multitude of angles can be performed with pro one bacause the mind made minute adjustments in your body on the way down into the shot to try to align where you land correctly. The subconscious is miraculous in its ability to complete tasks like this, but it will make errors for new users along the way to being programmed for consistant success.

Let me make this clear. I believe Pro one can be used successfully after many hours of programming. I know, Many of you users will claim that you use it effectively right now, but what I mean is that it will be able to be used like Landon uses it. It will take time for the subconscious to learn to position your body that consistantly though. My claim about dropping straight into the shot being better still stands. There is less variables to compute when your head and other bady parts are already on the line.

I think the reason so many new users like cte is because it is the first time they have experienced letting the subconscious do the real aiming. Before they were trying to consciously check to see if their parrallel system was matched up correctly once they were down on the shot, or they were making adjustments once they were down because it did not look like they were lined up to hit the ghost ball, or to create a half ball hit, or whatever. Everything was done consciously with conscious adjustments once they were down and now that they have a system that uses the subconscious they see more success. I do believe that even faster and greater success can be learned with a system that starts them off on the line of the shot. They just have to remember to trust their sub did its job once they drop into the shot and then pull the trigger.

You clearly do not understand CTE. You are just speculating why it can't be.
I understand your mindset. Years ago, at times, I too thought it couldn't be but I adopted the attitude that there was nothing I could not understand about CTE if I put the work in. I went through doubtful periods but I never gave in and I never gave up. I am quite satisfied at this time concerning my CTE knowledge.

A very strong math person came for CTE PRO ONE work yesterdsy and he questioned me in every way possible and shook his head "no" on multiple occasions. Well, when the lesson was over he knew he had experienced something quite special that was never supposed to be. This individual will be speaking out at some point. He saw and experienced aiming of another dimension. You can do the same.

Your post is about aiming does not describe real CTE.

Thank you for your interest in CTE, though. Keep up your hard work. I just hope it includes time on the table with your visual intelligence. Of course, there's the motor aspect of execution. But real CTE is mostly about one's visual intelligence at the table.

Stan Shuffett
 
Last edited:
Stan,

If you read my post again you might find that I don't think cte "can't be".

I understand that if you put in the work it is miraculous, in fact some find it miraculous from the start if it is the first time they are using their sub to aim with. I said it would take time at the table letting your sub get programmed for success with it, I understand the time at the table you speak of.

By the way, I do understand your system and don't appreciate your blanket statement that you use to discredit anyone who does not see it to be the greatest thing since sliced bread. I also understand that this visual intelligence you speak of is a very appropriate description of what is happening because the subconscious does not communicate with words, it communicates with pictures.
 
Last edited:
Stan,

If you read my post again you might find that I don't think cte "can't be".

I understand that if you put in the work it is miraculous, in fact some find it miraculous from the start if it is the first time they are using their sub to aim with. I said it would take time at the table letting your sub get programmed for success with it do I understand the time at the table you speak of.

By the way, I do understand your system and don't appreciate your blanket statement that you use to discredit anyone who does not see it to be the greatest thing since sliced bread. I understand that this visual intelligence you speak of is a very appropriate description of what is happening because the subconscious does not communicate with words, it communicates with pictures.

You have very little if any understanding of real CTE. If we were together you would very quickly see the divide.

Sure, CTE can work like you describe it and that would be ok with you but what you speak of was never part of what Hal Houle knew was special about CTE.

We are in 2 different worlds of aiming.

You can't see CTE to be special because you do not know it at this time.

Stan Shuffett
 
You have very little if any understanding of real CTE. If we were together you would very quickly see the divide.

Sure, CTE can work like you describe it and that would be ok with you but what you speak of was never part of what Hal Houle knew was special about CTE.

We are in 2 different worlds of aiming.

You can't see CTE to be special because you do not know it at this time.

Stan Shuffett


lol. (((Satori))), just put a burlap bag on, pour some ashes over your head and roam the streets calling out, "Ashes, ashes. Unclean! Unclean!" It'd be easier.

Lou Figueroa
(((still chuckling)))
 
Stan,

...I do understand your system and don't appreciate your blanket statement that you use to discredit anyone who does not see it to be the greatest thing since sliced bread.
You'll get the same defensive reaction from almost all CTE users: "You can't know what you're talking about because you haven't spent hours learning CTE." For some reason they think it's some kind of insult to the system to suggest that it isn't completely, robotically accurate without any "feel".

As you seem to know, CTE obviously "works" for those who like it. They don't really know how it works for them (and mostly don't seem to want to know) - that may be part of why it works for them.

pj
chgo
 
You'll get the same defensive reaction from almost all CTE users: "You can't know what you're talking about because you haven't spent hours learning CTE." For some reason they think it's some kind of insult to the system to suggest that it isn't completely, robotically accurate without any "feel".

As you seem to know, CTE obviously "works" for those who like it. They don't really know how it works for them (and mostly don't seem to want to know) - that may be part of why it works for them.

pj
chgo

Same old same old. It is robotically accurate, but in real game usage we do use feel, just not as you perceive feel to be used when playing pool.
 
It would be very nice to watch ''pro one'' or ''real cte'' players, play faster. The ones i have watched play very very slow. You have to ''win the crowd '' (gladiator movie....).

Where you from ? Gladly accommodate your request.
 
I agree with you bobn. But an average of 25-30 seconds between shots would be fine. More than a minute is too much for a good player. And a player who plays slow is never a good one. He tries to ''play'' the other player and not the table. Or he is not very smart. My opinion.

Go to a pro tournament and point out the fast players. Shane plays as slow as anyone under tournament conditions.
 
Just recently, I learned that if I use the small end of the stick to hit the cb and not the big end with the rubber bumber, the cb is easier to move around plus the stick is easier to hold.

I might have a chance to beat someone now.

First..........
 
Exactly!

And when John points out that Stevie and Landon are capable of making every shot using pro one he is proving my point.

My point I was making in the other thread is that pro one or cte is a method that relies on the subconscious mind to put you in position to make the shots. The subconscious needs to be studied by anyone who does not understand how it works. Anyone can find plenty of information on the web or in a library.

It's easy to group everything into the subconscious but then how do you account for misses? According to you and others throughout this seemingly endless debate it's all subconscious adjustment when we make shots but you never explain the misses?

You can also find much research on the web or in a library on CONSCIOUS action, deliberate action, conscious improvement by consciously changing one's methods or techniques.

Here is some food for thought. If all cuts to the right executed with pro one only have 5 visuals X 2 ways to pivot to take you exactly to "center ball," (as if center ball is one position), then there would be exactly 10 contact points capable between the cue ball and object ball. 5 x 2 equals 10 and 10 lines of aim are hardly enough to make every cut to the right.

You guys always go back to this. The answer is incredibly simple and yet you do not accept it. I have a video on this very thing.

The answer is that every single time you move either the object ball or the cue ball you must move your entire body to a new line. You have a new CTE line to start from. Using that new CTE line you orient yourself according to the system and you find that indeed there is a wide range of INDIVIDUAL shots for which the same set of visual perception works to acquire the shot line. There is no way around it, move the ball=new shot=new body position.

The truth is, everytime you move your head to the left or right the position of center ball changes, there is no one center ball when you are sweeping into the shot from an angle. The multitude of ut shots can be made with pro one bacause the mind makes minute adjustments in your body on the way down into the shot to try to align where you land correctly. The subconscious is miraculous in its ability to complete tasks like this, but it will make errors for new users along the way to being programmed for consistant success.

Wrong. In fact with very very very little exception you cannot make even two shots from the same body position without serious contortion. Minute head movements can result in the eyes leading the body to a different line than the actual centerball shot line but that line will be INCORRECT and the shooter must throw the object ball into the pocket. As stated above every shot is an individual shot so every shot requires it's own visual approach.

I can set up two shots side by side, one ball width apart and we can bet on whether you can make both from one stance position just by moving your head. Save your money because it's a lock that I will win.

Let me make this clear. I believe Pro one can be used successfully after many hours of programming. I know, Many of you users will claim that you use it effectively right now, but what I mean is that it will be able to be used like Landon uses it. It will take time for the subconscious to learn to position your body that consistantly though. My claim about dropping straight into the shot being better still stands. There is less variables to compute when your head and other bady parts are already on the line, therefore less programming for the sub, therefor great consistancy will come much faster.

You can make that claim but in fact if you don't know where the shot line is then you can't very well drop straight onto it now can you? If we all know where the line is then this whole discussion has no meaning. And yet there are 1500 ghost ball trainers out there to help people visualize the line - devices that they cannot use in a game. And yet despite the wonderful subconscious that is supposedly responsible for all of our successes we still miss the thin cuts, the slightly off angle long shots, the shots up the rail and so on even after having trained extensively with every ghost ball device out there and after having hit thousands of shots.

If aiming were as easy as dropping onto the line then there wouldn't be any discussion of it. No other methods would exist, good players like Stan and Phil and Darren and Ekkes and Stevie wouldn't even spend any time on aiming.


I think the reason so many new users like cte is because it is the first time they have experienced letting the subconscious do the real aiming. Before they were trying to consciously check to see if their parrallel system was matched up correctly once they were down on the shot, or they were making adjustments once they were down because it did not look like they were lined up to hit the ghost ball, or to create a half ball hit, or whatever. Everything was done consciously with conscious adjustments once they were down and now that they have a system that uses the subconscious they see more success. I do believe that even faster and greater success can be learned with a system that starts them off on the line of the shot. They just have to remember to trust their sub did its job once they drop into the shot and then pull the trigger.

You discount the work involved in learning and trusting the method. It's not something that comes easily to a lot of us. Very interesting that you think CTE is a doorway to the subconscious where the brain knows how to aim.

Well let's assume that it is.

Then it's the greatest possible tool for pool ever discovered. Case closed - learn CTE and let your subconscious take over. If you miss then your subconscious took a break, don't worry it will come back :-)

Funny part is that the Hit-a-Million-Balls Ghost Ball Forever crew says that the subconscious is also zeros in on the aiming line after x-number of practice trial-and-error shots. Guess all roads lead to the subconscious eh?

I think that the subconscious needs to get some credit next time a pro wins a tournament. After all the pro made no conscious effort to win, the subconscious did it all while the pro was thinking about American Idol.....

Tongue-in-cheek of course Satori however the point I want to make which you might find if you try to learn CTE is that it's a very conscious and deliberate method which brings you to shot lines where your mind is screaming is not right and you have to force yourself to trust it only to find that indeed the line you think is wrong is in fact 100% correct.

Why is this? Well, because all your life you have been "seeing" the shot wrong but thinking it's right. Then you either make it with a little throw or you miss it when focusing on a straight stroke and wonder why?

We are aiming round balls into round balls. This is the fundamentally difficult task in pool. No one knows FOR SURE where the shot line is all the time. If they did then yeah, just drop in on that line and be done with it. There are only a few shots in pool where the shot line is known 100% - the straight in shot, the spot shot (half ball hit) - the rest are pretty much estimations if you are using a method like GB.

If you use CTE you aren't estimating the shot line at all. Not at all you don't even look for or see the shot line until you are down on the cue ball.

That is the fundamental difference and because it's a formula that guides you there it's not guessing (pure feel) and not subconscious adjustment into an unknown. It's pure reliance on an objective measure for 100% repeatable results.

At least this is my experience in the CTE journey so far.
 
I agree with you bobn. But an average of 25-30 seconds between shots would be fine. More than a minute is too much for a good player. And a player who plays slow is never a good one. He tries to ''play'' the other player and not the table. Or he is not very smart. My opinion.

Care to make a bet on Landon's tempo? I will give you a head start

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=1HYQjoHjwL4#t=3552s

I bet a beer it's less than 30 seconds per shot. To include shots considered to be "tough". (look at the five ball shot)
 
You'll get the same defensive reaction from almost all CTE users: "You can't know what you're talking about because you haven't spent hours learning CTE." For some reason they think it's some kind of insult to the system to suggest that it isn't completely, robotically accurate without any "feel".

As you seem to know, CTE obviously "works" for those who like it. They don't really know how it works for them (and mostly don't seem to want to know) - that may be part of why it works for them.

pj
chgo

I know why it works. You don't.
 
Just recently, I learned that if I use the small end of the stick to hit the cb and not the big end with the rubber bumber, the cb is easier to move around plus the stick is easier to hold.

I might have a chance to beat someone now.

I doubt it but life is full of miracles. Travis Trotter is waiting for a game.

Jb i think i have watched all your youtube videos. You were talking about ''pivoting to ghost ball'' and other funny things !!!!!!!!!!!! It doesn't seem that you are such a good shooter. That's my opinion of course. Landon and stevie shoot really well. But they are very slow players. And people love to watch fast players playing good pool.

I am a terrible player. Can't make a ball. But I do like the CTE method and my videos reflect my own ongoing study of it. I will be happy to take a spot from you though and bet something :-) Please make sure your id says ps611846 so I know you didn't put a ringer in on me. Cuz you know being heckled by an anonymous person is so hurtful....

By "automatically" John means "by feel gained through practice". It's the special language used to tell the CTE Legend.

pj
chgo

No Pat it's a special language you use to excuse yourself from learning CTE while allowing yourself the latitude to attempt to explain why it works. If you ever did actually learn it you might get some understanding but since you have invested so much of your online time into taking the position you have I suspect that it might be too much of an emotional leap to change your mind.

In any event you are a banger and I am a banger. Neither of us is anything special as a pool player. So based on that I will stick with what I like and you stick with the fidgety method you like. You can make balls and I can make balls and we both miss and occasionally we can run a few racks.

So whether either of us is right or wrong isn't determined by our own point of view but by the efforts of people with far more study invested.
 
You'll get the same defensive reaction from almost all CTE users: "You can't know what you're talking about because you haven't spent hours learning CTE." For some reason they think it's some kind of insult to the system to suggest that it isn't completely, robotically accurate without any "feel".

As you seem to know, CTE obviously "works" for those who like it. They don't really know how it works for them (and mostly don't seem to want to know) - that may be part of why it works for them.

pj
chgo

I'm not going to argue whether or not there's feel involved in Pro One. I won't even argue whether or not Pro One has less feel than GB. What I will say is that "feeling" a shot out with Pro One is much easier than GB.
 
I'm not going to argue whether or not there's feel involved in Pro One. I won't even argue whether or not Pro One has less feel than GB. What I will say is that "feeling" a shot out with Pro One is much easier than GB.
Well of course it is - for you. Why else would you use it?

By the way, CTE and ghost ball (whatever you conceive that to be) aren't the only ways to aim. In fact, I'll bet the vast majority of players use neither.

pj
chgo
 
Reply to John: How do You account for misses?

John,

Do you walk subconsciously?

When you were learning to walk did you ever fall?



I'm going to tell you something else that applies to missing shots.

Mastering a skill to where you can perform it subconsciously is not enough. Think about what would happen if I asked you to walk across a 6" beam stretched between the top of two skyscrapers with nothing undernieth. I'm willing to bet that it would be hard for you to develope the ability to eliminate that picture in your head of a possibility of falling. If you cant remain confident then your conscious mind will want to take over and you would start to pay a lot more attention to where your weight is, how big your steps are, etc. I'm also willing to bet that walking across that beam becomes much harder than if that same beam were laying on the ground. As I said, mastering a skill to where you can easily perform it subconsciously is not enough, in order to really become a ball pocketing macbine you must learn how to play subconsciously under pressure.


C.j. can probrably explain how much easier the game becomes when you can perform great without much conscious thought. I believe he has a drill of going down into your stance and shooting imediately, without any backstrokes. That drill is designed for people who get down and start to consciously make adjustments to improve their aim imo. I'd like to hear C.J. Discuss if he had to develope or study mental techniques in order to remain pocketing balls while gambling for high stakes against guys you can't afford to miss against.

Jimmy Ried named his DVD "No time for negative." that's the perfect name for a DVD on pocket billiards IMO.
 
Last edited:
JB Cases:
...every single time you move either the object ball or the cue ball you must move your entire body to a new line. You have a new CTE line to start from. Using that new CTE line you orient yourself according to the system and you find that indeed there is a wide range of INDIVIDUAL shots for which the same set of visual perception works to acquire the shot line. There is no way around it, move the ball=new shot=new body position.
This is so obviously untrue that believing it means you're probably incapable of ever understanding why. I don't mean that as an insult, just a pertinent fact that's true of many. There's really no question about this.

pj
chgo
 
This is so obviously untrue that believing it means you're probably incapable of ever understanding why. I don't mean that as an insult, just a pertinent fact that's true of many. There's really no question about this.

pj
chgo

If you intend to play with consistency in bridge length it's absolutely true. Yes there are some shots where if you KNOW the GB line then you can stand in a solid unmoving position and hit the cue ball along that line and pocket the ball. But to do it COMFORTABLY you WILL move your body in some way.

And when it comes to the CTE line it 100% changes as the distance changes. So if you have marked out a known line and you place five cue balls each five inches apart and sight the CTE line FROM each CB to the OB then you will 100% have five different body positions.

But even if I were to grant you that all shots along a GB line are the same shot then all those shots would be the same under any other system as well.

What Satori is talking about are shots which are NOT on the same GB line. I.e. when you place the cueball at various places in an arc around the OB and his/her contention is that it's not possible for CTE to handle all these cut angles. IN fact it is possible for the reasons I have already explained.

Here are a few more videos from my perspective that show this. Whatever standard insults you have about me you can go ahead and copy/paste them into your reply before watching the vids if you even watch them.

My theory on why CTE works

Parallel Shots - Claimed to be impossible for CTE to handle.

This one was done two years ago with placing balls in different spots along the head string. I was just starting to play around with CTE as I understood it. Even though my CTE understanding was quite rudimentary at the time (and may still be) I still was able to pocket the balls all along the string. I used other balls to show how far from the center spot the setups were.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vlefilh3MIo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top