CTE Does NOT Work - It Did For One Pro

CTE alignments naturally consist of an overcut line to the thin side of the ghost ball core.

This aspect of CTE is just one of its many positive attributes that makes it a professional aiming system.

Three aim lines makes all shots is another super strong attribute of CTE.

What I really love is that CTE leads the player to precision center cue ball alignments minus any adjustments.

I think that I answered Dan’s question about throw in an exemplary manner. In my free TRUTH SERIES I will be addressing topics from A to Z about CTE. My TS will be hugely supportive to CTE players all around the world.

Stan Shuffett

I thought there was 4 total alignments..wasn't an 1/8 added?
 
“Overcut alignment” must mean the alignment needed to compensate for throw. “Natural” probably refers to CTE’s magical ability to “take you to” the overcut alignment without any “steering” or “estimation” by the player.

pj
chgo

There’s nothing magical about it. It’s inherent to the process.

Since I’m the one between you and I that really knows and understands how the CTE system works, that sort of put you and your knowledge in a very suspect and precarious position.

You speak very well when it comes to topics that you know about, but when it comes to CTE you’re just firing blanks.

Stan Shuffett
 
Last edited:
I thought there was 4 total alignments..wasn't an 1/8 added?

15 30 45 60 ( 4 major alignments ) The 60 as lan extremely thin cut can be iffy at times. Essentially, all shots can be made with one of 3 aim lines.

Before I became totally schooled on the 15, I did use a 7/8, too. That was many years back.

Stan Shuffett
 
Last edited:
CTE alignments naturally consist of an overcut line to the thin side of the ghost ball core.

This aspect of CTE is just one of its many positive attributes that makes it a professional aiming system.

Three aim lines makes all shots is another super strong attribute of CTE.

What I really love is that CTE leads the player to precision center cue ball alignments minus any adjustments.

I think that I answered Dan’s question about throw in an exemplary manner. In my free TRUTH SERIES I will be addressing topics from A to Z about CTE. My TS will be hugely supportive to CTE players all around the world.

Stan Shuffett

For clarification, one thing pops out to me here.

There is a borderline between using a 15 or a 30 (or between using a 30 or a 45), meaning that once the shot angle exceeds a certain amount, the player must progress to the next perception. Are you saying the system provides an overcut everytime, even as the shot angle approaches the borderline where one particular perception will no longer work because it won't provide a thin enough result?
 
For clarification, one thing pops out to me here.

There is a borderline between using a 15 or a 30 (or between using a 30 or a 45), meaning that once the shot angle exceeds a certain amount, the player must progress to the next perception. Are you saying the system provides an overcut everytime, even as the shot angle approaches the borderline where one particular perception will no longer work because it won't provide a thin enough result?

There’s no areas of in between. It’s one or the other in relation to center pocket. Yes, the overcut line is a constant. It’s minute, but it’s always present and that’s the MAJOR reason that CCB is used so much more in CTE than what is typically used in conventional systems.

Stan Shuffett
 
15 30 45 60 ( 4 major alignments ) The 60 as lan extremely thin cut can be iffy at times. Essentially, all shots can be made with one of 3 aim lines.

Before I became totally schooled on the 15, I did use a 7/8, too. That was many years back.

Stan Shuffett

I was thinking that. Does distance play a role on an alignment changing?
 
For clarification, one thing pops out to me here.

There is a borderline between using a 15 or a 30 (or between using a 30 or a 45), meaning that once the shot angle exceeds a certain amount, the player must progress to the next perception. Are you saying the system provides an overcut everytime, even as the shot angle approaches the borderline where one particular perception will no longer work because it won't provide a thin enough result?

"What you talkin' 'bout, Willis" :D
 
So the truth series and the book??? ETA??? Been hearing about both for 3 years and how they are almost complete
 
It’s been a long tough road.
It took four years to do the writing, diagrams, and photography.
I turned all of that in to a publishing services company in January of 2019. Their first order business was to get a clean edited copy of my text. The copyediting didn’t begin until May of that year. The editing phase lasted until January of this year. Finally, the text, images, and diagrams entered into the design phase. It sat there till April. The design phase is flowing now. After design is finished, it will all be sent off for the printing process.
So, I’m five years in. I don’t feel too bad, though. Five years and counting is not uncommon for a lengthy, complex book.
Thank you for your patience and interest.

Stan Shuffett


Here ya go.

Stan Shuffett
 
CTE deals with throw very well because of the natural overcut alignment that occurs.

The natural overcut alignment "occurs" for me too, and for every other player that makes shots, regardless of their aiming method. What do you imagine CTE does differently?

Point of information: what is the definition of natural overcut alignment.

“Overcut alignment” must mean the alignment needed to compensate for throw. “Natural” probably refers to CTE’s magical ability to “take you to” the overcut alignment without any “steering” or “estimation” by the player.

There’s nothing magical about it. It’s inherent to the process.
The same way it's "inherent to the process" when I (and everybody else) do it? If not, what's the difference? Please be specific (if that's possible with CTE).

pj
chgo
 
The same way it's "inherent to the process" when I (and everybody else) do it? If not, what's the difference? Please be specific (if that's possible with CTE).

pj
chgo

Firing blanks again. I have been playing pool for 62 years, 47 years conventionally and about 15 years with CTE. I KNOW the difference between the two and the difference is night and day. You’ve have not logged a single day in your life with CTE, yet you’re able to assert things about CTE that you have no idea about.

The specifics are coming in my TS and book.

Stan Shuffett
 
Firing blanks again. I have been playing pool for 62 years, 47 years conventionally and about 15 years with CTE. I KNOW the difference between the two and the difference is night and day. You’ve have not logged a single day in your life with CTE, yet you’re able to assert things about CTE that you have no idea about.

The specifics are coming in my TS and book.

Stan Shuffett


Why are you naming it the truth series..was there some things that had to be removed or redone from the previous material?
 
Why are you naming it the truth series..was there some things that had to be removed or redone from the previous material?

Anthony, My TS will reveal the whole truth about CTE. Sure, there’s some new info coming or I certainly wouldn’t have embarked upon a book writing project. It’s time that’s that it’s cleared up.

Stan Shuffett
 
Still no answers. That's what I know about you.

pj
chgo

I’d say it’s quite possible, figuratively speaking, that I have produced a thousand bits of info about CTE. So, I ask you how many bits of info have you submitted to the public concerning CTE other than CTE is fractional requiring adjustments. That’s two and they’re both wrong. Anything else?

Once again, you’re operating on an empty tank. To say that I am a person that has had no answers is ludicrous. That may be the most off/base comment that you have ever made on this forum.

Stan Shuffett
 
Back
Top