:smile:ECF…..go back and read my post #18…….and you say you’re an engineer and you don’t recall my mention about cue weight and ivory joints.
When was that blind test that you’re so impressed with….'91 (.almost 25 yrs ago). And what were cues like in the 60’s….the 70’s……thru the 80’s…….
my custom design 1985 Runde Schon cue is an example…….thick cue butt…. my cue weighs 20.35 ozs……the cue butt weighs 16.2 ozs……the butts
on my ivory joint cues are 14.5 ozs.......1.7 ozs lighter…..cue butts right from the mid 80's & earlier tended to be thick and were heavier cues than today.…..
what were the weights of the cues in that blind test? I have neither the time, not inclination, to educate you any further and you can take that 1991 blind
test to your grave for all I care……people that have made the switch will not go back. Personally, I hope you remain steadfast in your opinion about flat
ivory joints & big pins……this way I can continue to chuckle to myself about that pig headed “engineer” on the Forum…..Just read post #18 again but if
you do not, regardless, I sure hope someone has double-checked your calcs on any projects you’ve worked on.
You really don't get it. I never said any joint was worse than another. I've stated that the emperical evidence shows that people can't tell the difference between joint types. You say you can, but unless you show me that you can go into a blind test and pick out the ivory jointed cues, I don't believe you.
I haven't ever said that ivory joint cues weren't the best, they well may be. What I have said is that there is no evidence outside of anecdotal tales that show ivory to be the best.
I'm sure few people who go to an ivory jointed cue goes back. There is a huge psychological reason for that. When someone buys an ivory jointed cue, it is almost certainly more expensive than the same cue with any other sort of joint. That person is proud of owning that cue and they should be, ivory is an amazing material, it is beautiful, natural and works well. This person who has put out extra money for a cue now has an additional reason to like it. I understand this because I like nice things also...I carry a $200 pen every day, $1000 worth of knives.
As an example, read this article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/03/weekinreview/03harris.html?_r=0. In summary, it says that colors in food affect the perceived taste. Not the actual taste, just the perceived taste.
Surely you've heard of the placebo effect. The person buys into the stated benefits of something and the benefits are seen, even though the person is only swallowing a sugar pill. The mind is a powerful thing.
We are influenced by our expectations every day. Many things can be perceived as better or worse because we expect it to be so, a 'self-fulfilling prophesy' of sorts.
This is exactly why blind testing and reducing bias is extremely important. The scientific method is based upon recognizing potential bias and finding ways of eliminating the bias.
As powerful as the mind is, and as much benefit as we get from simply believing something to be true, I maintain that proof of any claim is necessary. The combined effects of belief and sound science are the pinnacle for which we should strive.
To reiterate, I am not saying you are wrong and never have. I'm saying that the only scientific research does not support your claim.