xX-Wizard-Xx
Well-known member
my aiming is exactly that ....All I can say about this subject…”Doesn’t any play pool instinctively anymore or has it become mechanical and theoretical?” Anyone? Anyone? Buller...
my aiming is exactly that ....All I can say about this subject…”Doesn’t any play pool instinctively anymore or has it become mechanical and theoretical?” Anyone? Anyone? Buller...
I think academia is unavoidable with this information society. (remember that?) But, you put together the chunks intuitively.All I can say about this subject…”Doesn’t any play pool instinctively anymore or has it become mechanical and theoretical?” Anyone? Anyone? Buller...
Sometimes it takes a while to find the forest when all these damn trees get in the way. I honestly, honestly think the whole point of any aiming system is to teach you to shoot instinctively, and perhaps get you sucking less until instinctive shooting actually clicks.”Doesn’t any play pool instinctively anymore or has it become mechanical and theoretical?”
What about your parents?The fact that any of my shots go in is a miracle to both me and my opponents.
As embarrassed as you imagine them to be.What about your parents?
This is good collaboration and needful - as long as we keep the conversation progressive. No offense should be taken for defending one’s point of view. I recall during a critical match that my vision had blurred and I could not see the OB contact point. I’d already processed where I needed to aim, but the view was obstructed. What do I do? Kudos to both you guys in knowing this: My setup and alignment had not changed, and I had to make the shot or possibly lose the game. I stepped back, recomposed myself, and pocketed the ball. The only thing I remember is that I went on to win that game. What I’m saying is that you can get results in many different ways. You must be confident that under pressure… “Shoot Pool.”Nope.
" I don´t care contact spot. It is too hard to see unless shot is close to straight in. I don´t recommend still players use that kind of aiming unless you are familiar of all aspects that affect the shot."
Pretty clear English there. I'm not even arguing.
I'm a contact point Nazi when it comes to aiming instructions. It's actually a contact lattice and only requires that you can envision in perspective. It's probably similar to how an illustrator sees drawing - only far simpler and no drawing required. I liken the process to carpentry since you can take the time to consider the marks either 2 or 1 dimensionally and rule your lines. The cutting results are like perfectly conjoined lengths of lumber. This differs greatly from mere estimation and I interject with this notion as the opportunity arises. It's just a statement of some facts and arguments against it fall into the sort of ridiculum this forum is peppered with. So, I don't push. Arguing is their game.This is good collaboration and needful - as long as we keep the conversation progressive. No offense should be taken for defending one’s point of view. I recall during a critical match that my vision had blurred and I could not see the OB contact point. I’d already processed where I needed to aim, but the view was obstructed. What do I do? Kudos to both you guys in knowing this: My setup and alignment had not changed, and I had to make the shot or possibly lose the game. I stepped back, recomposed myself, and pocketed the ball. The only thing I remember is that I went on to win that game. What I’m saying is that you can get results in many different ways. You must be confident that under pressure… “Shoot Pool.”