Cynergy 10.5 also good for Pool-Billard?

Because of the cue's natural elevation it's even slightly higher than that. And for some (longer) shots you actually get better power draw hitting a little above the miscue limit.

In other words, cue size is no excuse for weak draw.

pj
chgo
On ideal conditions. What happens when you need max rpm period?
 
If the top edge of a horizontal 13mm shaft laying flat on the table isn’t below the miscue line, then the ball is marked wrong (e.g. my Rempe ball is wrong).

I think the makings on the Rempe ball are very close to the center of your cue, not the contact point, although it looks like the ring would still be at the absolute limit, if not over.
On this Rempe ball the miscue limit (maximum spin contact, halfway from center to edge) is marked with the blue circle (ring 3). For maximum spin you'd point the center of your tip inside ring 5 and the tip's outer edge wouldn't reach the ball's edge.

pj
chgo


Rempe+CB.png
 
Last edited:
If you need it immediately, of course you hit at the miscue limit. But if you need max rpm at a distance, say for a long shot with power draw, you hit a little above the miscue limit to maximize speed and limit friction/spin loss.

pj
chgo
You mean forward speed or revolution rate? This would be a borderline jump shot as well - something else I suk @.
 
max rpm? did you check the coefficient fluid?
Supposed to be set permanently at the factory.

No, the “hit a little higher” technique isn’t to get the CB airborne - it’s to optimize the speed/spin ratio for longer shots.

pj
chgo
That only works from off the rail for me; elevation/shooting downwards you know. I can see you get a higher gear shooting closer to center but that also propels the ball faster.
Lemme ask you this. What's the theoretical maximum of draw action across different cue weights?
 
If by "higher gear" you mean more RPMs, that's wrong. If you don't mean that, what do you mean?


Lemme answer you that: who cares?

pj
chgo
Me cares. But think about this, if you analogized shooting off center to turning a crank, isn't closer to center a higher ratio than out on the edge? And that the ball rotates faster with a closer to center hit at the expense of more forward propulsion?
 
... if you analogized shooting off center to turning a crank, isn't closer to center a higher ratio than out on the edge? And that the ball rotates faster with a closer to center hit at the expense of more forward propulsion?
For a draw shot, the RPMs at the OB are what counts - hitting higher only results in more RPMs at the OB on longer shots, where the initial RPMs are reduced less by the reduced sliding time.

Your analogy sounds logical, but then why don't we get maximum draw for short shots by hitting closer to center?

pj
chgo
 
Last edited:
Does anyone played that 10.5 Cynergy already?
A friend has ordered one for Chinese-8, I have only hit the 11.8 and 12.5 - didn't like either. But then I don't like Carbon. I can take some pics and ask my friend when his arrives how he feels about it. Pretty sure I wouldn't like it, or give it a non-biased review lol
 
Thanks….would like to know, how this 10.5 shaft performs in Pool….
The 10.5 has very low deflection, the hit is kinda stiff, as is with majority of cf shafts Ive tried.
Due to the tip size ,its pin point accurate, , but can be unforgiving being it is so small.
The key take away imo....
It performs the same as any other shaft out there, basically itll only play as good as the player behind it . 😉
 
Last edited:
Does anyone played that 10.5 Cynergy already?
i bought one that i could return and have played with it off and on over the last few days ( i asked for a g2 soft tip since thats what i play with on my revo)
i have been playing with a revo 11.8 for more than a year
i like my little pea shooter....:)
it definitely is smaller and the view on the cueball is like a sniper aiming at a target..i like the visual
it sounds softer than the revo
deflection is about the same
action is about the same...maybe the revo is alittle stiffer
fwiw i bought the bull and whyte carbon shafts and returned them because of the higher deflection from the revo
i dont think i will return this cynergy shaft
even if i continue with the revo
this is from playing pool with it
 
As I've said, I believe the answer is it isn't worse - I'm asking what makes you think it is.

pj
chgo
If they use a flatter tip, then a larger diameter cue allows you to hit closer to center even when your aim is off? Maybe that's why they say that small diameter gives them "unwanted" spin.
 
If they use a flatter tip, then a larger diameter cue allows you to hit closer to center even when your aim is off? Maybe that's why they say that small diameter gives them "unwanted" spin.
Yes, that's probably what they're thinking, and it makes a little sense, but the difference is too small to matter. Here's a diagram that shows the tiny difference in tip/CB contact points for different curvatures, even at maximum offset (at the miscue limit).

pj
chgo

Tip Curvature and Contact Points.png
 
I believe they've basically made this to sell in China for Chinese 8-ball (...and for those who are playing other pocket billiards games that think smaller means better). This particular size is aimed at the Chinese market, and more specifically, Chinese 8 players, who are either going all out on expensive pool cues, or buying expensive full shaft snooker cues and having them mutilated to suit.
I can't get on with anything but 9.5 on a snooker table, and I am using a 12.2 or 12.5 (depending on the game) shaft for American table. I can see how and why a smaller tip can be beneficial on the napped Chinese 8 tables, somewhat irrelevant on American tables with less reactive cloth/cushions.
but the thing is they don't sell 10.5 in China. I just checked online. They only have 11.8 and 12.5. the 10.5 cues are much rarer in China than the other two
 
Back
Top