No surprise that the snooker players (e.g. Robertson, Selby and Melling) have taken to the game and done well in this tournament. In the UK and Australia they would all have played a fair bit of E8B - and Selby went as far as "World" Champion. The big question though is how well would they do at real ("A8B") 8 ball pool. We've seen, particularly in the early days of the Mosconi Cup, snooker players have a crack at 9 ball pool. They competed well but generally came up short tactically. But they generally don't play rotation games as part of their apprenticeship. Real 8 ball pool, with real pool pockets, allows shots to be made that can't be made on a C8B table (we might like to call this "creativity"). Those shots are an inherent part of real pool. But we still don't know if the snooker players would adjust or not.
Even better than the C8B "World" Championship would be the Chinese sponsors throwing the money into a real 8 ball tourney with similar payouts and inviting the top snooker players. Then maybe Barry Hearn would get involved and we wouldn't have to watch it on a buffering stream.Correct me if I'm wrong, but there is pretty much no sample to indicate how active professional snooker players (with an E8B background) transfer their skills to 8 ball (without playing the game for some time). The final does seem to suggest that Appleton's knowledge of the game gave him an advantage over Selby's snooker fundamentals. Having said that it was a sample of one and it was close and I'd like to see how much of a difference C8B or A8B pockets really make at the elite level between the top cuesmiths.
I guess we'll never know as the money seems to be behind C8B.