It seems there is consensus that JJs comment implies the outcome of a softer hit letting the OB naturally roll easily into a more accepting pocket. I think we all know a firm hit can jaw up balls where a softer hit would have dropped.
At this point it seems the debate is on the phrase “overspin on the object ball” and whether that means...
A) It’s a weird way to describe a naturally rolling object ball...OR
B) He misspoke and meant to say “overspin on the cueball”, because he was describing getting some force follow (overspin) out of a soft stroke resulting in good action AND a naturally rolling cueball.
Unless I’m misreading things and I’m unawares.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I think he was talking about the CB and MW also knew that.
Sometimes, on the fly doing commentary, there can be a disconnect between what you mean to say and what actually comes out of your mouth.
Lou Figueroa