Good review Freddie. I was sent a Digicue also, and I agree with your assessment. I also agree with Bob that it would be nice if the Digicue could detect a non-straight stroke (with no side-to-side motion into the ball) and any deceleration into the ball. I think that would make the device much more useful, since what happens during the stroke into the CB is much more important than what happens after the CB is already gone. It would also be nice if it could detect a jerky transition between the final back stroke and the forward stroke.
I thought the Digicue was fun to play with; but after a while I couldn't help but focus on the limitations. Like you, I thought it gave misleading results with firm english shots (even with a good stroke). I also thought it had a little trouble with firm draw shots (also with a good stroke). It makes sense that the cue vibration and motion that can occur after a firm off-center hit can lead to bad readings. I also wondered if the upward motion of the butt (after the hit) due to a pure pendulum stroke could cause a false reading. If so, it would be nice if the device could use gravity info to detect the vertical direction and only look for side-to-side motion.
Regardless, it was fun to play with. I also enjoyed fiddling with my stroke and follow-through to see what things would and would not cause bad readings.
Regards,
Dave
Have you had any opportunity to compare it with the qmd? With all of the data it provides through its connectivity it would seem a natural for a guy with your numbers and objectivity outlook - one I share, BTW. I like the idea of seeing the numbers behind the beep to see what made it beep.
If not, I should have one in a few days and you are welcome to come down to the Greeley Senior Center and try it out so you can compare them. We'd love to have you come down and play some 3C with us anyway. PM me if interested.