Does anyone actually believe GAMBLING will

kaznj said:
I have noticed that many B players are always telling the C and D players that the only way they will get better is if they gamble. Oddly enough, when the A players are around the B players are no where to be found.

That is very funny.:thumbup:
 
Pushout said:
Only if you have a problem with gambling. Sounds to me like you may know someone who does. Amazing how bitter some people are about whether other people gamble or not and why. I have to wonder if that's why you started this thread in the first place. It's not like it hasn't been discussed here adnauseum before this.




I worked with a guy one who had Pony Fever, we use to go to Santa Anita on the weekends, I occasionally would place a SHOW BET, not ever Race occasionally.

Cliff on the other had would HAVE to BET ever race, I would say he was in the RED from what I saw of his success.

I remember once betting a GRAY Horse in the Last Race once, and Cliff?s Nag did not finish in the Money, and the Gray did.

Cliff accused me of "JINXING HIS BET," because he thought my betting the Gay Horse what bad luck for him.

Our friendship ended on Friday when he ask to borrow $20.00 until Monday (payday) so Rose his wife would have money to buy groceries. I ask if he was going to the track that weekend, and Cliff replied YES.

I ask where his track money was coming from if he need money for groceries, and why he need a $20.00 Loan from me. He explained that he had money in his HORSE FUND for Santa Anita. I told he needed to put his family before the Horses.

I never went to Santa Anita again with Cliff, and our friendship end when I dropped him home, as I was his ride to work.

Cliff IMHO had put the Horses in from of his Wife, and Kids on his priority list..:angry:
 
Last edited:
Roger Long said:
Oh, please excuse me. I'm new here, and I thought this was a discussion forum. Now that I know it's a single-word answer forum, my answer is: NO (gambling does not make you a better player).

Roger
It really doesn't matter if you're new here or not. Let's not get all melodramatic. I was just pointing out that some of you were making up phantom arguments. Of course this is a discussion forum, but if you read some of the "discussions" on this thread, you'll clearly see that some of you guys wrote things like "anyone who says you need to gamble to get better... " etc....

Well, that's not what was said, and that's not what was asked. The moment people start claiming other people said something they didn't, or they start answering questions that weren't asked, then the "discussion" becomes completey unrooted as always.

I think the original question and those who answered it were fine. And I think your answer of "no" is fine. The original poster wanted to know why you thought so. That is, the answer is "yes, because..." or "no, because..."

Now, as I said, if the question was "Is gambling required to get better...." that's a different question with its own set of answers. And I'm sure most of us whom some of you are "disagreeing" with actually would agree with you if that was the question. But it wasn't.

Fred
 
SJDinPHX said:
For the record Mully, I could care less if you or anyone else chooses not to gamble. My point was, how many pool players of any stature would we have WITHOUT gambling ? Not all pool players who like to gamble are "scumbags". Boy you must have gone off a few times, to be so bitter!


Are you always so pleasant? You can't have a conversation without getting snotty? Not once did I say all pool players that gamble are scumbags. I said there are a lot of scumbags that gamble. If you don't know any of those types, the ones that stain the game, then you don't really play pool.
MULLY
 
AngryPanda said:
Let me ask you something Crawfish how many great players do you know?
and how many of them have actually said gambling is a requirement?
I do know quite a few. Actually have a few on speed dial (Not that it matters, I still have them from my "running around" days). They WILL tell you it does make you a better player. Remember, that Was the original question. Of course it's not mandatory.
 
CocoboloCowboy said:
Gambling like Drug or Alcohol Abuse is a DISEASE that give the Gambler a RUSH, not winning or loosing, the placing of the bet. The out come is totally unimportant.
Maybe if it is 50/50 outcome. Playing for the cash in pool should never be 50/50. If it is, you're not doing it right. "The outcome is totally unimportant." You're kidding, right? If not, I call bullsh#$.
 
mullyman said:
It makes total sense, Russ. Gambling isn't going to improve your play, only practice will do that. Gambling will make the game more interesting for you if that's what you prefer but it won't improve your technique etc... I don't care how much anyone bets. You can bet a billion dollars and it's not going to improve your draw stroke. Hours of practice by yourself is the only thing that is going to accomplish that. Betting is entertainment, just like watching football.
MULLY
True. True. But, there are guys that play like Zeus, then you put ANY kind of pressure (tournament, or a beer) and they'll shoot'em into the rails like there's no pockets. So, why all the practice if you're not gonna put it into play in some fashion? Oh well, different viewpoints.
 
AngryPanda said:
Thorsten Hohmann doesnt gamble.
Pressure is a state of mind. No one can put more pressure on you than yourself! Whether with something on the line or not.
I think a lot of people say it is necessary, are just looking to get a game
Gambling may make the game more interesting. But is not a necessity to improving your game

Thorsten may not gamble now. But has in the past.
 
I guess I look at it like this: getting shot isn't so bad when you're in a paintball fight; real bullets, however, have a way of inspiring people to become good at not getting shot. :)

I also think there's a distinction to be made between gambling on horses and gambling at pool. I bet money on pool weekly, but I never go to a casino, or play cards, or bet on any sports, or really anything else. When I bet on pool, it's because I think I've found a game I can win... and I like money. If I don't win, it's either because I misjudged the skill of my opponent (my fault), failed to make the right game (my fault), or I didn't play the way I was supposed to (again, my fault). I think that's a lot different than betting on a basketball game or a horse race, competitions where you have absolutely no control over the outcome. JMHO.

Aaron (dodging real bullets since 1990 ;) )
 
Let's say your opponent gets this shot against you and is these balls away from a 3 pack:
http://CueTable.com/P/?@3FYSa4GWra3HAmp4ICKM3PSfj@

Now, you are playing for fun. I can practically guarantee shooter banks the 6 in effort to stay at table.

Same scenario, hill-hill for the winner's side final @USOpen. I can practically guarantee shooter sticks whitey behing the 8/9.

Which one is 'harder' to beat? AKA the shooter shooting his 'smartest' pool?
:welcome:
 
CocoboloCowboy said:
Make you a better Pool Player.:sorry: I hear this song and dance all the time, and I believe the answer is NO.

If you believe differently.......JUSTIFY WHY YOU THINK NOT :eek:

I think to a certain degree gambling will make you better. No, it is not the "Magic Solution" to make all players better. But gambling can be used as a "Tool" to help you. Overall, to me, what will make you better player is a combination of things: Practice, Gambling, Tournaments (Handicap and Open), Playing in different environments and equipment, playing different games(So not to be a one hit wonder), watching other players(Not just watching to see who wins but analyzing their game, run out patterns, moves, cue ball positions, etc..) and last and foremost you have to have a love for the game.
 
Poke N Hope said:
I think to a certain degree gambling will make you better. No, it is not the "Magic Solution" to make all players better. But gambling can be used as a "Tool" to help you. Overall, to me, what will make you better player is a combination of things: Practice, Gambling, Tournaments (Handicap and Open), Playing in different environments and equipment, playing different games(So not to be a one hit wonder), watching other players(Not just watching to see who wins but analyzing their game, run out patterns, moves, cue ball positions, etc..) and last and foremost you have to have a love for the game.
Nicely put. Use ALL tools. For some, gambling brings out the best of their game. Quite the opposite in others.
 
Gambling by itself? Nah.

Of course gambling won't make anyone a better pool player. If that were the case then betting the horses would improve my pool game.
It hasn't, nor will it for anyone else. Case closed.

It is just a method used to incite a heightened emotional state. There are many other means of doing that. As just one example, fear.
Say a sadistic maniac kidnapped both you and your opponent, improsined you, and implanted a capsule-sized bomb in each of your skulls.
Race to 5,000. As many months/years as it takes. Loser gets blown up. No gambling involved on either part, he'll just kill the loser.

One might argue that this is the ultimate gamble, but technically no one put up anything willingly, the situation was forced on them.
In this case it would be fear that was driving them. Fear alone won't make a player better at the game either. I've seen new players in APA
who are almost terrified of losing their match, but it does nothing to help their game.

I'd say it goes something like this:

Gambling -> Inspiration -> Practice -> Better
Fear ----------^
Pride ----------^
Various -------^

Definitely not:

Gambling -> Better
Fear ---------^
Pride ---------^
Various ------^

In the end if gambling inspires you, then it can lead to becoming a better pool player, but in and of itself, I have to say it does nothing.
 
crawfish said:
True. True. But, there are guys that play like Zeus, then you put ANY kind of pressure (tournament, or a beer) and they'll shoot'em into the rails like there's no pockets. So, why all the practice if you're not gonna put it into play in some fashion? Oh well, different viewpoints.

We have a couple here in Raleigh. One may not miss a ball in an hour as long as your playing for free. Bet 2$ a game or he plays in a tournament and he plays like an APA 2. The other always practices 3 and 4 rail banks and kickshots, makes a high percentage of these shots. Never plays anybody always practices by himself.
 
i think that gambling constantly puts pressure on you, and anyone who has ever gambled can tell you that makes you more comfortable when pressure situations arise.some poeple hold up under pressure, and others don't seem to be ble to handle it. i can't imagine anyone not used to pressure who could succeed in tournament situations. some people will never stand up to the heat , and without knowing the posters here, i tend to believe some of them fall in this catagory. try betting you case money, and see how you hold up. a few of these matches, and if it doesn't help you keep you composure in intense situations,then you may need to be one of adamant "non-gamblers" who post on here.
 
Here is the thing. Everyone who is saying gambling doesnt really matter are speaking in theory. Everyone who is saying that gambling does help a player compete better can point to either personal experience or a great player who told them their story. For any one top player who doesnt gamble I can name 30 that have or do. It is just part of the game. If you don't like that part of the game fine.

If someone chooses not to gamble, fine. No big deal. But don't tell me the sky is green because it simply isn't so.

If you are telling me that a guy who does nothing but practice by himself plays a guy of a similar skill level who plays money matches for whatever stakes under different conditions and situations will have the advantage you just don't know what you are talking about.

As far as comparing betting horses to playing pool, the last I checked you are not under pressure to perform anything on the rail of a track. It is comparing apples to hand grenades.
 
BigDaddyInc. said:
Practice is like studying for a test. Gambling is the test. So you can spend your whole life studying without taking the test or take the test.

Not really. The test would be whatever you are playing to accomplish. For many that could be city championships, league playoffs or maybe just a local tourney. Winning money is just winning money. Few will know about that accomplishment.

Many an accomplished gambler fails when tested in these ways. If you blow a shot in a tourney you may be done. There is no going back and asking for another game to make up your losses. You go home knowing you failed. That's too much pressure for many a gambler.

I know one guy personally who is a phenominal gambler, yet fails miserably whenever he is tested in a tourney. He gambles all the time but that is the key. He practices "gambling" and so is very good at matching up and gambling. His pool game, however, does not improve much. ..just his gambling skills.

Gambling, like any form of playing, will no doubt improve your game, but not any more than playing regularly in as many good tourneys as possible. Competition is the real test. Any form of it, not just gambling. Even league play.

Ed
 
Black-Balled said:
Let's say your opponent gets this shot against you and is these balls away from a 3 pack:
http://CueTable.com/P/?@3FYSa4GWra3HAmp4ICKM3PSfj@

Now, you are playing for fun. I can practically guarantee shooter banks the 6 in effort to stay at table.

Same scenario, hill-hill for the winner's side final @USOpen. I can practically guarantee shooter sticks whitey behing the 8/9.

Which one is 'harder' to beat? AKA the shooter shooting his 'smartest' pool?
:welcome:

On the first scenario, banking the six, you're probably right. If there's nothing on the line you may take the shot. But I hope you don't mean that the same person wouldn't make the right decision if it was the US Open.
MULLY
 
JCIN said:
So if you match up with someone who is of equal speed as you but is in action constantly versus just practicing by himself you don't think the guy who competes more has an advantage?

This is a key sentence. Competition. Gambling is one form of it and maybe not the best form for most people. The problem with gambling is that the money aspect is distracting from the competition. For some (those who enjoy gambling) it works but not for all.

Ed
 
One other thing, money pressure and finals in a tournament pressure are two different beasts. I know guys that shoot lights out gambling but can't win tournaments and vice versa.
MULLY
 
Back
Top