PocketPoint
Banned
this should be an interesting discussion for the rest of the day. i'll be back later tonight to continue the talk.
Gene: Here's a question: A few months back, after reading a bunch of your posts, I went to the table and worked on this very thing. However, for me, it seems that I need to move my eyes based on the direction of the cut for it to "look right". When I keep my head in one spot, it might look right for most shots, except when I need to thinly cut to the left. For those shots, I move my head to the right, so that my cue is just to the left of center of my nose. For most shots, the cue is under my right eye - and shots "look correct" there; but when I cut to the left, I move my head so that my left eye becomes dominant, or at least I'm using both eyes equally. Is that something that comes up in your experience?
I *could* retrain my brain to see the shots as correct that currently don't look right, but that seems counter-productive in the long run. Since I noticed/discovered that trick, I've been cutting balls in that I would never even attempt before.
This post has the learning experience and the shot that I used to figure it out.
A quick and simple way to find your dominant eye.
Look at something 20' away or more with both eyes open.
Point to that something.
While pointing, close one eye then the other.
The eye that remains "on point" is your dominant eye.
No pool table needed for this simple test.![]()
That is the weirdest and most confusing thing I've ever heard in pool!
I think a person knowing his dominant eye has nothing to with playing good
pool.If one can make a long straight in shot with good results he should not have to worry about if he's shooting with his dominant eye.
Its all about finding how your body see's the straight in shot.Yes your eyes
have everything to do with it but not just the dominant eye.
I am right eye dominant and i favor the left eye a little.This is something i cant change,this is how i make a straight in shot and it has nothing to
do with just the dominant eye alone.
Its all about finding the straight line and while some people will find that
they favor the dominant eye and some wont and you cant change it.
I want to tell you a short story,i had a friend that played real good,
he wasn't pro but played very high level 8 ball.1 day he was telling me he bought some dvd that was talking about the dominant eye.He didnt
even realize that we had one.Well he started messing around with
what he had learned and his game took a real beating.
It wasnt long he went back to his old ways.
The thing is he was trying to fix something that didnt need fixed.
He did not need know anything about the dominant eye.
(btw it wasnt your dvd)
Gene im not trying to bash what you teach i just have a different
view on things. Have a good Day..
what is Earl strickland dominant eye?![]()
BCA is the law. I don't question it, even if I know it's not right. I say yes sir and move along.
One was that about 40% of the players that did the standard pointing and looking through circles test for eye dominance would get down to shoot and they were actually the opposite eye dominant.
I agree that these tests are simple and you were probably thinking I am not the sharpest tool in the shed not knowing these simple tests but I assure you I do.
In fact one of these opposite eye guys is our own Spidey here on AZ and there are hundreds more.
I don't know how to explain it but they absolutely cannot see the shot correctly by having the eye that the pointing test or any other test says is dominant in the dominant position.
If you already know which eye is your dominant eye, do you need to buy the dvd?
If you noticed, Geno did not mention his DVD once in this thread. (Other than the banner in the sig, just like everyone else here who sells stuff has.)
He merely described a way to determine one's dominant eye. The topic has come up a lot here lately, and Gene seems to be qualified to speak on the topic, wouldn't you think?
I too fall into this category. I am right eye dominant if I use the finger-point from 20', but when I'm down over a shot cutting the object ball to the right, if I move my head slightly to the right, I can see the shot better, and vice-versa for cutting a ball to the left. Gene, because of your many threads on this subject I have been playing around with my head position and it has certainly been an eye-opening (pun intended) experience. Now that said, I still can't make three balls in a row :embarrassed2:, but at least it looks right when I'm aiming. I am definitely going to play around with it some more.
Maniac
I happen to be one of those freaks that doesn't have a dominant eye. I see two of any object that my focus is not on at the same distant. You wouldn't believe how much grief that I have caught on vision test when they ask me to say what letter the dot is on. For aiming purposes I use the shaft on the right because I am right handed. But I am still plenty aware of the shaft on the left which is equally visible. When I play left handed I switch to the shaft on the left. It gives my arm more room.
A little confusing stuff and I apologize if it's been covered...but doesn't the dominant eye not really matter since it comes into play only about an arms length away and you have to use both your eyes to see the line any further out? From personal experience I am able to see 99% of the angles (in my head). I of course don't make anywhere near that many shots but I can at least see it without positioning my head in any specific way at all. I get down on the shot on the same line every time. Maybe I just got lucky I can at least "see" the shot.
Gene,
Thanks for this post. I'm going to try it the next time I'm at the table and will call you with questions if I have any issues.
Muziq
This is why you can't really tell where the eyes are when you are aiming. They kind of just try to do their own thing and sometimes their own thing makes the wrong eye work as the dominant eye. Sabataging the shot.
A little confusing stuff and I apologize if it's been covered...but doesn't the dominant eye not really matter since it comes into play only about an arms length away and you have to use both your eyes to see the line any further out? From personal experience I am able to see 99% of the angles (in my head). I of course don't make anywhere near that many shots but I can at least see it without positioning my head in any specific way at all. I get down on the shot on the same line every time. Maybe I just got lucky I can at least "see" the shot.