mullyman said:I hope you got something out of it that will improve your game.
Again, if you read my post, you would KNOW that I did get quite a bit out of this. Isn't literacy a bliss..?
-- peer
mullyman said:I hope you got something out of it that will improve your game.
worriedbeef said:Peer,
You may well have been perfectly polite and respectful with Earl.
But there's no denying that the way you worded your original post implies you were a bit argumentative with Earl, and undermined his authority of being the teacher.
If this is not the case then once again, apologies, but you cant complain with people thinking this because of the way you worded your original post.
worriedbeef said:If this is not the case then once again, apologies, but you cant complain with people thinking this because of the way you worded your original post.
Peer said:Apologies accepted. If Earl himself (or anyone at the event) would've complained about my questions, it would certainly have had some weight. But all this phony fabrication of how badly I treated Earl is just silly. And no, Mully, my "feelings" aren't hurt. Again, you are silly.
Love, peace, and understanding,
-- peer
Peer said:Again, if you read my post, you would KNOW that I did get quite a bit out of this. Isn't literacy a bliss..?
-- peer
av84fun said:All right...enough is enough.
Peer said:At one point Earl set up a very tight cut shot, carefully marked with chalk. The purpose was to show that the only way to pocket a cut shot like this was to apply outside english. After trying to make the shot, over and over again, Earl concluded that he must have set it up too tight. Well, I started to argue that it would perhaps be easier (and more precise) to use no english but just focus on hitting it as thin as possible and hard. My fellow student Garrick agreed. But when Earl insisted that there was no way to make this shot without outside english, to his dismay I stepped up and made the shot, with no english at all (and with my gnarly European snooker cue I may add). Earl wasn't too happy.
-- peer
cuetechasaurus said:Peer, can you please diagram the shot that Earl said can only be made with outside english? Thanks
mullyman said:Hmmm, what kind of car does Earl drive?
MULLY
Peer said:Jim, you are so right -- I'm a fraud. Therefore I take everything back. The truth, as you so eloquently pointed out, is that I hate Earl and hence treated him like shit, from start to finish. I even hate the car he drives. And don't get me started on that silly Archer guy. If I so much see his dog, I gonna kick the crap out of that sucker.
Are you happy now...?
-- peer (who believes smilies are for wussies)
av84fun said:By the way...is that you in your avatar? What happened to the guy's eyebrows? Looks like he was attacked with a weed whacker!
Peer said:You are so very kind.
(yea, now also I realize that this thread has gone doo doo ;^)
-- peer
Bigdogbret said:So did they send you off with anything on paper that you could refer to later? Drills? Practice tips?
As a teacher by profession, I find students will forget most of what they are taught pretty quickly without something to help refresh their memory.