staticfire98
New member
With the recent events I'm ready to jump on the Gorst bandwagon. I remember reading a thread a while back speculating on his change in sponsorship and with him ultimately choosing Viking. In a clip he mentioned plans on launching a signature line with Viking. I used to bike around Madison, WI and remember riding through their parking in Middleton by the beltline. So with Gorst representing a Wisconsin company, I headed over to the site. I have not ever looked at a Viking product but I'm ready to see if something there is interesting.
My Suggestions to Viking:
1. Start with a very high end jump cue. I would make this the first signature Gorst product. I think the latest trend is the 3 piece (the new mezz and predator as examples) that allows for short / high and long / lower jumps. A high end jump cue would appeal to a certain marketable broad audience and maybe start to generate some buzz. Play videos of Gorst jumping over and over again. It is beautiful. It will sell if you make it cost competitive. Price it under the Air Rush. People will start talking.
2. DO NOT PUT HIS SIGNATURE ON THE CUE! Did Miki put Mika Immonen's name on his Exceed? Why did Cuetec make SVB's cue stick so ugly? Sorry if that offends anyone. I love the cynergy shaft. I bet the cue plays very well. I don't have an interest in test hitting it let alone possessing one. This is weird becuase Cuetec seams to do quite well with marketing. They should make the SVB cue subtle and white if that's the intent. The large signature on the forearm is not good.
3. Viking is middle curving the Whyte carbon shaft at $600. They should think in razor and razor blades with the shaft and adapters. This is where I think Cuetec hit a home run with the Cynergy on pricing and options. At $400 I bought a 11.8mm and a 12.5mm in 5/16-14. I have a lot of fun playing with those shafts and am happy owning both. At $600 I cannot convince myself to buy one Whyte carbon shaft. I like practicing with the 11.8mm and playing with the 12.5mm. If the Whyte shaft was $450 or $475 I would probably own 2 with at least 3 diferent joint adapters. Right now, I can't justify spending $600 on one shaft and commiting to one tip diameter and then paying $70 more for each adapter.
4. There are too many tip sizes increasing by 0.25mm. I think 3 options would be better from a business standpoint. 11.75mm, 12.0mm, 12.25mm, 12.5mm and 12.75mm. Think 80/20.
My Suggestions to Viking:
1. Start with a very high end jump cue. I would make this the first signature Gorst product. I think the latest trend is the 3 piece (the new mezz and predator as examples) that allows for short / high and long / lower jumps. A high end jump cue would appeal to a certain marketable broad audience and maybe start to generate some buzz. Play videos of Gorst jumping over and over again. It is beautiful. It will sell if you make it cost competitive. Price it under the Air Rush. People will start talking.
2. DO NOT PUT HIS SIGNATURE ON THE CUE! Did Miki put Mika Immonen's name on his Exceed? Why did Cuetec make SVB's cue stick so ugly? Sorry if that offends anyone. I love the cynergy shaft. I bet the cue plays very well. I don't have an interest in test hitting it let alone possessing one. This is weird becuase Cuetec seams to do quite well with marketing. They should make the SVB cue subtle and white if that's the intent. The large signature on the forearm is not good.
3. Viking is middle curving the Whyte carbon shaft at $600. They should think in razor and razor blades with the shaft and adapters. This is where I think Cuetec hit a home run with the Cynergy on pricing and options. At $400 I bought a 11.8mm and a 12.5mm in 5/16-14. I have a lot of fun playing with those shafts and am happy owning both. At $600 I cannot convince myself to buy one Whyte carbon shaft. I like practicing with the 11.8mm and playing with the 12.5mm. If the Whyte shaft was $450 or $475 I would probably own 2 with at least 3 diferent joint adapters. Right now, I can't justify spending $600 on one shaft and commiting to one tip diameter and then paying $70 more for each adapter.
4. There are too many tip sizes increasing by 0.25mm. I think 3 options would be better from a business standpoint. 11.75mm, 12.0mm, 12.25mm, 12.5mm and 12.75mm. Think 80/20.
Last edited: