For Derekdisco

G

Grady

Pro Player
When I get back from Reno, I'm going to have some fun at your expense,"disco". I hope you're man enough and human being enough to apologize and maybe we can start off brand new. What you posted is complete drivel and it's really hard for me to defend myself against that.
I'm going to prove 100 per cent that your statements are ridiculous and you shoud be ashamed of yourself for spouting off like that.
How about everyone pulling for ol' Grady for a change instead of not believing a word I say.
Anyway, you guys just wait. What I can't believe is that noone sees the same thing I do. Well, it'll be fun relating it to you. See everybody in Sept.
 
From what I have seen

It is not too easy for spectators to see the tables very good, and some would need binoculars of some sort. Never been anywhere that had the 'bowl' effect like Burke's Steakhouse.
 
Grady said:
When I get back from Reno, I'm going to have some fun at your expense,"disco". I hope you're man enough and human being enough to apologize and maybe we can start off brand new. What you posted is complete drivel and it's really hard for me to defend myself against that.
I'm going to prove 100 per cent that your statements are ridiculous and you shoud be ashamed of yourself for spouting off like that.
How about everyone pulling for ol' Grady for a change instead of not believing a word I say.
Anyway, you guys just wait. What I can't believe is that noone sees the same thing I do. Well, it'll be fun relating it to you. See everybody in Sept.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't give DerekDisco too much credence Grady, he may just be trying to stir you up. He says he was at a nearby table but he wasn't a participant so what was he doing there? Did someone have him there as their cornerman? I think to see your shot he would have to be standing up at the nearby table which doesn't seem likely. Since he wasn't at the next table over (if he was even there) he would be at least a couple of tables away and yet he says he saw a very thin hit.

Any longtime one-pocket player (like yourself) usually knows with absolute certainty whether a shot was a foul or not and at very worst it would be a too close to call a foul situation if you didn't know with certainty. Since you don't have this one in the too close to call variety it sounds like the ref just blew it completely.

Wayne
 
wayne said:
I wouldn't give DerekDisco too much credence Grady, he may just be trying to stir you up. He says he was at a nearby table but he wasn't a participant so what was he doing there? Did someone have him there as their cornerman? I think to see your shot he would have to be standing up at the nearby table which doesn't seem likely. Since he wasn't at the next table over (if he was even there) he would be at least a couple of tables away and yet he says he saw a very thin hit.

Any longtime one-pocket player (like yourself) usually knows with absolute certainty whether a shot was a foul or not and at very worst it would be a too close to call a foul situation if you didn't know with certainty. Since you don't have this one in the too close to call variety it sounds like the ref just blew it completely.

Wayne
Click to expand...

First rounds did not have cornermen :( , so that possibility is out. Seated in the audience he may have been able to see something IF the table was right next to spectators seated in the high chairs, or one was spectating from the aisle (on tables close to the aisle). Otherwise, it was hard to see anything on the middle tables.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top