That’s right. I’m not watching it, but by the score it’s clear. Scott MUST squeeze him and contain him. He’s not gonna out shoot him. Only way he can win. Standard shooter vs mover 1P match.Scott’s not squeezing hard enough.
It just won't make any difference. Like Filler against Chohan, Gorst can pull away anytime imo. A lot of old-timers really underestimate the overall skill set and high pool IQ of Gorst and Filler. These kids are geniuses irl.That’s right. I’m not watching it, but by the score it’s clear. Scott MUST squeeze him and contain him. He’s not gonna out shoot him. Only way he can win. Standard shooter vs mover 1P match.
Best
Fatboy
Yes those 2 are a once every 20 years talent. SVB doesn’t have the talent either of those 2 have. SVB works hard and has continued to have that work ethic which has served him well, and his break(best ever in pool). But in terms of “raw talent” filler/Gorst are like Earl-next level raw talent. In a couple more years game over they will win everything everyone will be playing for 3rd place.It just won't make any difference. Like Filler against Chohan, Gorst can pull away anytime imo. A lot of old-timers really underestimate the overall skill set and high pool IQ of Gorst and Filler. These kids are geniuses irl.
It ended for Day 2 at about 9 pm Louisville time, 14-9 Gorst (7-3 today).Anybody got a score update please?
Easy way to make a hard livingAnyone who plays either Gorst or Filler any pool game in a long-race "straight-up" is going to lose. Remember Alex P. thinking he could beat Gorst in 10-ball lol?
After "spotting" Frosty the first 3 games on day one, Gorst is 14 and 6.
The easiest job in the world is being one of these kids' backers lol
100% correctI think the only reason a lot of the young straight shooters can match up well in 1p with players like Scott and Tony today is because of the wealth of knowledge available at the click of a mouse. They can look up things that used to take players years to figure out. It's a lot like chess. Let's say you bring back Bobby Fischer, maybe the best player that ever lived. He might struggle today even against top 100 players because they have access to computer engines, more game databases, and many new theories since the 70s.
It's not "the only reason", but yes watching one-pocket matches on youtube definitely does add to their strategy arsenal.I think the only reason a lot of the young straight shooters can match up well in 1p with players like Scott and Tony today is because of the wealth of knowledge available at the click of a mouse. They can look up things that used to take players years to figure out. It's a lot like chess. Let's say you bring back Bobby Fischer, maybe the best player that ever lived. He might struggle today even against top 100 players because they have access to computer engines, more game databases, and many new theories since the 70s.
I didn't have a single chance to watch Fedor playing 1P this year (this is when I believe he actually got hold of it), but looking at his results I assume Fedor is far from just a shooter in this game, he well might be a mover himself already.Standard shooter vs mover 1P match.
Alright, let's lock those two beasts in one cage then! Fight!!!Anyone who plays either Gorst or Filler any pool game in a long-race "straight-up" is going to lose
I doubt a mouse (computers/videos) have anything to do with their ability. Coz I'm yet to meet a pro who ever watched the others play on tape (i.e. video recorded). When I was talking with SVB about how he mastered 1P so fast, he simply said he was watching what the players do. But it was live, at the events. So there is no mouse as an intermediaryI think the only reason a lot of the young straight shooters can match up well in 1p with players like Scott and Tony today is because of the wealth of knowledge available at the click of a mouse.
you think these guys are sitting on the throne watching uTube?I think the only reason a lot of the young straight shooters can match up well in 1p with players like Scott and Tony today is because of the wealth of knowledge available at the click of a mouse. They can look up things that used to take players years to figure out. It's a lot like chess. Let's say you bring back Bobby Fischer, maybe the best player that ever lived. He might struggle today even against top 100 players because they have access to computer engines, more game databases, and many new theories since the 70s.