FS~ Paul Dillelo Sneaky w/ Ultra joint

ToomnyQs

ToomnyQs

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Offering for sale this custom Sneaky by Paul Dillelo. This cue is an amazing player with a 3/8-10 joint similar to a Lambros ultra joint.. Cue is straight and in excellent condition.. Butt is 14.5oz and shaft is 3.5oz/12.62mm.. No Ivory...
Sale Pending
 

Attachments

  • 007.jpg
    007.jpg
    73.6 KB · Views: 800
  • 008.jpg
    008.jpg
    71.3 KB · Views: 799
  • 009.jpg
    009.jpg
    70.3 KB · Views: 813
  • 010.jpg
    010.jpg
    58 KB · Views: 793
  • 011.jpg
    011.jpg
    74.8 KB · Views: 805
Last edited:
Can this be called an ultra joint or is that patented?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Please Stop!

Billyard said:
Can this be called an ultra joint or is that patented?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Please stop busting Balls!
Its obvious it's not a ML. It's a $200 cue for christ sake. Let the guy pass on a deal to someone who only needs a $200 sp.
Really sick of all the forum K9 lately.

ToomnyQs, Good luck with your sale!
 
J-Flo said:
Please stop busting Balls!

Its obvious it's not a ML. It's a $200 cue for christ sake. Let the guy pass on a deal to someone who only needs a $200 sp.

Really sick of all the forum K9 lately.



ToomnyQs, Good luck with your sale!
Click to expand...


It's was an honest question. I did not mean to "bust his balls". Is the term "ultra joint" patented?

To bust balls though I will ask a follow up question; since this is only a $200 cue does that mean it does not have to follow patent laws if indeed the term "ultra joint" is patented?

Not being a forum cop but if I worked hard to create and develop a technology I would hope others wouldn't use my name to sell their product.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Cue is still available.. I would have edited the title but the system will not let us do that.. I apologize for my oversight.. It is a nice cue for under $200.. Just not a Lambros!

OOPs.. I just realized I bumped my listing too early.. Sorry for that.. I am not in the habit of breaking AZ rules, just copyright and patent stuff..
 
Last edited:
?

I thought I read similar to a ultra joint .... he never EVER stated that it was a ultra joint
 
To answer your question regarding patenting, patents pertain to structures and methods for the manipulation of structures. Patents do not pertain to names/terms. Therefore, any term by definition cannot be patented. Trademark law might protect the term, but in the absence of more facts, I don't know about this particular term set. After re-reading the post, the post also does not violate trademark law. It is settled law that the use of a trademark for comparison to another product does not violate trademark protection. Additionally, copyright doesn't apply for reasons I won't go into. The poster hasn't violated any IP laws pertaining to his original post.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top