Fs-- Thomas Case, Whitten Case, J.white Cue, Gilbert Cue

J. White Cue

FLYINGSNAIL said:
Hi Charles, I am 2nd in line still have not got your respond yet. Hope is soon
Kenny,
Forwarded you photos the the cue and case
Thank You,
Charles
 
Ktown D said:
This is another prime example of the Chinese fire drill that ensues when a poster wants to sell something and doesn't stipulate to respond in-thread. All the private email and PM bullsh*t can be avoided and everyone will know who made their offer and when if it is all in the thread. I believe the seller has the option to pick and choose whom they want to sell to but it sure leaves some people with hard feelings regarding how the items were sold. Good luck to everyone who responded early, you better hope noone offered 10 dollars more than you did in a PM. You would never know if they did just that they were "quicker" than you.


CHARLES WOULD NOT CONDUCT BUSINESS THIS WAY. IF HE IS TELLING YOU HOW HE IS SELLING HIS STUFF, THAN THAT IS HOW HE IS DOING IT. IF HE SAYS ORDER WILL GO BY WHO REPLIED FIRST, THAT IS HOW IT WILL BE DONE.

I ACTUALLY TOOK OFFENSE TO YOU INSULTING A GOOD PERSON LIKE THIS IN A PUBLIC FORUM. I AM SURE THAT THERE ARE SELLERS ON HERE THAT WOULD DO BUSINESS IN THE WAY YOU MENTION, BUT THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CHARLIE. HE IS ONE OF THE NICEST PEOPLE THAT I HAVE MET IN THE CUE GAME.

I'M SORRY IF MY POST IS OUT OF LINE, BUT I FELT CHARLIE DESERVED TO BE DEFENDED FROM THESE REMARKS.
 
Items For Sale

Ktown D said:
This is another prime example of the Chinese fire drill that ensues when a poster wants to sell something and doesn't stipulate to respond in-thread. All the private email and PM bullsh*t can be avoided and everyone will know who made their offer and when if it is all in the thread. I believe the seller has the option to pick and choose whom they want to sell to but it sure leaves some people with hard feelings regarding how the items were sold. Good luck to everyone who responded early, you better hope noone offered 10 dollars more than you did in a PM. You would never know if they did just that they were "quicker" than you.
Ktown,
I'm doing the best I can at the current time. I agree with your respond in-thread suggestion, just wish I would have thought of it before I posted the thread. I don't want to offend anyone, I will do my best to make sure that doesn't happen. I will also assure everyone that the items for sale will be sold for the money I requested. I will honor my thread and stand behind my word. Just looking to sell a few items.
Regards,
Charles
 
Thank You

FAST_N_LOOSE said:
CHARLES WOULD NOT CONDUCT BUSINESS THIS WAY. IF HE IS TELLING YOU HOW HE IS SELLING HIS STUFF, THAN THAT IS HOW HE IS DOING IT. IF HE SAYS ORDER WILL GO BY WHO REPLIED FIRST, THAT IS HOW IT WILL BE DONE.

I ACTUALLY TOOK OFFENSE TO YOU INSULTING A GOOD PERSON LIKE THIS IN A PUBLIC FORUM. I AM SURE THAT THERE ARE SELLERS ON HERE THAT WOULD DO BUSINESS IN THE WAY YOU MENTION, BUT THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CHARLIE. HE IS ONE OF THE NICEST PEOPLE THAT I HAVE MET IN THE CUE GAME.

I'M SORRY IF MY POST IS OUT OF LINE, BUT I FELT CHARLIE DESERVED TO BE DEFENDED FROM THESE REMARKS.
Marcus,
Thanks for the kind words, I did receive your email last night, I believe it was around 9:40 EST, if the items don't sell I will let you know.
Regards,
Charlie
 
Gilbert Cue

bogey54311 said:
ill take the james white AND the gilbert.


chris G
413-297-2100
Chris,
Sorry for the delay, I don't know what status of the J.White cue currently in, I waiting on a response from Zeek, Flysignal, and poolgue. Do you want photos of the Gilbert cue before you purchase the item? I will call you tomorrow, don't want to distrub your Mother's day.
Thank You,
Charles
 
pocono said:
Ktown,
I'm doing the best I can at the current time. I agree with your respond in-thread suggestion, just wish I would have thought of it before I posted the thread. I don't want to offend anyone, I will do my best to make sure that doesn't happen. I will also assure everyone that the items for sale will be sold for the money I requested. I will honor my thread and stand behind my word. Just looking to sell a few items.
Regards,
Charles
I didn't intend this as a personal attack at you. I don't know you from Adam and many others on here do not either. I made an observation that all of this could be avoided if sellers would stipulate to respond in the thread. IMO this is how all sales should be done on this forum but I am probably in the minority. I offer my apology if my comment was taken as a personal assault, it was not intended that way although I can see how my last comment could have been taken in that regard.
 
Ktown D said:
I didn't intend this as a personal attack at you. I don't know you from Adam and many others on here do not either. I made an observation that all of this could be avoided if sellers would stipulate to respond in the thread. IMO this is how all sales should be done on this forum but I am probably in the minority. I offer my apology if my comment was taken as a personal assault, it was not intended that way although I can see how my last comment could have been taken in that regard.
KTown,
No apology required, I didn't take your thread as a personal attack, in fact your respond in the thread suggestion is a great idea.
Regard,
Charles
 
FAST_N_LOOSE said:
CHARLES WOULD NOT CONDUCT BUSINESS THIS WAY. IF HE IS TELLING YOU HOW HE IS SELLING HIS STUFF, THAN THAT IS HOW HE IS DOING IT. IF HE SAYS ORDER WILL GO BY WHO REPLIED FIRST, THAT IS HOW IT WILL BE DONE.

I ACTUALLY TOOK OFFENSE TO YOU INSULTING A GOOD PERSON LIKE THIS IN A PUBLIC FORUM. I AM SURE THAT THERE ARE SELLERS ON HERE THAT WOULD DO BUSINESS IN THE WAY YOU MENTION, BUT THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CHARLIE. HE IS ONE OF THE NICEST PEOPLE THAT I HAVE MET IN THE CUE GAME.

I'M SORRY IF MY POST IS OUT OF LINE, BUT I FELT CHARLIE DESERVED TO BE DEFENDED FROM THESE REMARKS.
Just because you know the person selling the items doesn't mean that anyone else does. I appreciate and respect you taking up for someone you consider reputable. I hope everyone involved in the transactions are happy in the end.

Just a rhetorical question-- If you didn't know the poster would my response have been so offensive given how the thread had unfolded to that point? Look at it from both sides of the matter.
 
Ktown D said:
Just a rhetorical question-- If you didn't know the poster would my response have been so offensive given how the thread had unfolded to that point? Look at it from both sides of the matter.

I KNOW WHAT RHETORICAL MEANS, BUT I WANT TO REPLY ANYWAY.....

NO, IT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SO OFFENSIVE TO ME, AND I UNDERSTAND YOU'RE POINT.

I JUST WASN'T GOING TO LET THAT BE SAID WITHOUT A RESPONSE TO DEFEND CHARLES. I WASN'T LOOKING FOR AN ARGUMENT, JUST TO DEFEND A GOOD PERSON. I KNOW CHARLES WOULD DO THE SAME FOR ME.
 
First reply....

Charles

Exactly 3 minutes after your original post (and before any posted replies), I emailed you regarding 3 of your items. I requested, in the email, to give me first consideration as it appeared that I was the first responder. I still haven't heard from you.

I will apreciate your reply.

RJ
 
Last edited:
I am not trying to cause problems here i just figured pm first and not draw attention to the item and i might have a shot......Fast n loose im not calling anyone a liar just trying to find out whats going on with my questions as when i pmd pocono he was online last night at 8:15 pm and hadnt gotten a response till about 3:00 pm this afternoon.........:)
Pocono thanks sir for the response................
 
pooldogue said:
I am not trying to cause problems here i just figured pm first and not draw attention to the item and i might have a shot......Fast n loose im not calling anyone a liar just trying to find out whats going on with my questions as when i pmd pocono he was online last night at 8:15 pm and hadnt gotten a response till about 3:00 pm this afternoon.........:)
Pocono thanks sir for the response................

NO ARGUMENT......A FEW THINGS, IN THE HOUR AFTER HE POSTED BEFORE YOU PM'D HIM, I AM SURE HE GOT MORE THAN A FEW RESPONSES...........JUST BECAUSE IT SHOWS ONLINE BY HIS USER NAME, DOESN'T MEAN HE'S AT THE COMPUTER, IF YOU LOOK AT MY USERNAME IT SAYS OFFLINE, AND I NEVER LOG OUT. THAT'S BECAUSE I AM INVISIBLE. I WENT TO THE INVISIBLE MODE, BECAUSE IT ALWAYS SAID I WAS LOGGED ON. I DON'T EVER CLOSE THE AZBILLIARDS WINDOW ON MY SHOP COMPUTER, MAKING IT LOOK LIKE I WAS ALWAYS IN THE FORUMS. MAYBE CHARLIE ALSO LEFT HIS AZ WINDOW OPEN WHEN HE WALKED AWAY FROM THE COMPUTER.
 
FAST_N_LOOSE said:
NO ARGUMENT......A FEW THINGS, IN THE HOUR AFTER HE POSTED BEFORE YOU PM'D HIM, I AM SURE HE GOT MORE THAN A FEW RESPONSES...........JUST BECAUSE IT SHOWS ONLINE BY HIS USER NAME, DOESN'T MEAN HE'S AT THE COMPUTER, IF YOU LOOK AT MY USERNAME IT SAYS OFFLINE, AND I NEVER LOG OUT. THAT'S BECAUSE I AM INVISIBLE. I WENT TO THE INVISIBLE MODE, BECAUSE IT ALWAYS SAID I WAS LOGGED ON. I DON'T EVER CLOSE THE AZBILLIARDS WINDOW ON MY SHOP COMPUTER, MAKING IT LOOK LIKE I WAS ALWAYS IN THE FORUMS. MAYBE CHARLIE ALSO LEFT HIS AZ WINDOW OPEN WHEN HE WALKED AWAY FROM THE COMPUTER.

I understand totally what youre saying just didnt want any hard feelings from anyone here, ive had a few things slip through in this manner and was just trying to clarify the situation..........:) :)
 
Another email sent...

rocitop said:
Charles

Exactly 3 minutes after your original post (and before any posted replies), I emailed you regarding 3 of your items. I requested, in the email, to give me first consideration as it appeared that I was the first responder. I still haven't heard from you.

I will apreciate your reply.

RJ


Charles

I sent another email.

Thanks
RJ
 
Back
Top