And we're right back to six keys for one lock…
Funny pic/gif thread...
- Thread starter dfweyer
- Start date
Scrunge19
Registered
If a key holder needs their access revoked, you would need to change to a new lock and give out new keys to the other 5 people. This could prove challenging depending on who those key holders are, where they’re located, etc. But if you use that device or daisy chain locks together, you could just remove their lock from the chain and everyone else is unaffected.
And what happens if you need to add another key holder?
As is often the case, a solution in search of a problem…
This is a 7/16 shank case hardened lock. Much heavier then the locks in the post. Tell me.... how long did this take?
How would opening just one of the locks release the chain?Engineers.
A simple chain does the same with unlimited locks.
pj
chgo
If this was in response to me, I still can't visualize it...?
pj
chgo
Each subsequent lock becomes the last link in the chain.
As long as any lock is replaced where it was removed from, access to others remains intact.
Nothing man makes can not be defeated. You are incorrect in believing those shackles aren't harder then that case hardened example. As for the sidegrinder cutoff wheel,you just blew yourself up if that is a gate protecting you from explosive materials.
But let's look at 6 keys- it's obvious that 6 different people need in- those 6 locks. Perhaps there are 6 offices inside all keyed to the same individuals key as their padlock. Perhaps the users are only temporary and often changing. Now you say why not master keying? Well that lowers the security. For six keys to work the lock has to be combinated to allow 8 keys. If users are constantly changing the locks need to be recombination and new keys generated.
dquarasr
Registered
Rejects from Monsters University?