Fusco's The Spot (smoking allowed - nasty)
- Thread starter poolmouse
- Start date
- Status
Its about your inability to make correct choices for yourself so you demand that laws be made in order to control the choices of everyone.Do you really still think this is about choice?
If you can't control your eating or how often you masturbate are you going to next demand that laws be created to limited peoples food consumption or how often people pleasure themselves?
Or is okay for the rest of us to decide that on our own?
Bottom line the problem is you not what others do.
Last edited:
He has made no valid points. Every time he tries, it is shot down. Then he changes his position just a little to try and come at it from another angle, which also fails. So, yeah, we get the point. He's a Nazi who wants the world to conform to his agenda because he believes he is right. It's not enough for him to just live his life and let the rest of us live ours. He wants control and he seeks it under the guise of health concern.
Yes, we have have seen and heard enough. At this point it has just become a thread to read for amusement purposes. Curiosity brings me back to see what other dimwitted statements he has made while thinking he he is better and smarter than everyone else!
What really makes my blood boil though, is knowing there are people with his point of view in positions of power. That's a scary thing, has been since 2008!
Arrogance? Coming from the guy who feels the need to tear down someone's business publicly because they haven't figured out how to make their own decisions.You still don't get it, such arrogance, and on someone else's dime.
Tearing down the accomplishments of others because they don't share the same opinion as you is about as arrogant as it gets.
So what you're saying is the publicly elected officials exercising the will of the people scare you?
If openly discussing the dangers of second hand cigarette smoke can have this effect, Fusco's The Spot should be even more concerned.
I'd wager mouses personality is a much greater threat to his health, and personal safety, than some second hand smoke. I refuse to believe he acts this way in public without getting ***** slapped.
If I had to be locked in a room full of smoke, or a room with him, I'd rather choke on smoke.
If I had to be locked in a room full of smoke, or a room with him, I'd rather choke on smoke.
So what you're saying is the publicly elected officials exercising the will of the people scare you?
I realize that the statement was not directed towards me, but I'll answer just the same. :smile:
Considering that the "people's" average IQ is about 90, yes!
Publicly elected psychopaths exercising their own, ego based, political agendas also bother me.
J
Ah, what a classic Freudian slip...or, calm down, nobody cares what you do in the privacy of your own home.
You still don't get it, such arrogance, and on someone else's dime.
Lol, arrogant huh.
Guess If i put a smiley or winkie face that would proclude me from being arrogant,
works for you dont it.
And it aint your dime sir so why worry.:wink:
:kma:
Way to walk into that one genius. You shouldn't care what a business owner does in the privacy of his own business. Too bad you can't take your own advice.Ah, what a classic Freudian slip...or, calm down, nobody cares what you do in the privacy of your own home.
Again you don't understand the difference between public property and private property open to the public.
Get a clue.
jimmyg, It wasn't directed at anyone, it was a general statement.
I wonder, where were the smokers when this bill hit the floor, and signed into law?
Lol, arrogant huh.
Guess If i put a smiley or winkie face that would proclude me from being arrogant,
works for you dont it.
And it aint your dime sir so why worry.:wink:
:kma:
Ironic, I'm guessing it's not yours either.
Which category does Fusco's The Spot fall under?
I'm assuming you already know smoking on "public property" is unlawful.
Are you implying they are "private property open to the public".
Do you realize that smoking in either would be a violation of the Clean Indoor Air Act?
Have you read the Clean Indoor Air Act?
Banks
Banned
You keep saying that you're being a troll for the sake of discussion. You haven't even attempted having any type of discussion about this. You just cry and cry and cry that they allow smoking and then threaten to have the place screwed around by the government.
I've seen you act like a socially inept troll before, but you've really outdone yourself this time. Go make a friend or something.
Cry about that, too.
I've seen you act like a socially inept troll before, but you've really outdone yourself this time. Go make a friend or something.
Cry about that, too.
What do you mean "Our lawyer"? Aren't you just some guy who works behind the counter? Now you speak for Mr. Fusco? You are privy to all his legal matters?
Does he know anything about this thread and you helping to perpetuate it?
Are you laying down a challenge for someone to file a complaint and see what happens because someone may. People like to be trouble makers. You honestly think Mr. Fusco wants you speaking on his behalf?
I could be wrong and you may well be the owner in which case why would you even respond to anything said on here?
Last edited:
Just out of curiosity I looked up PA's smoking law, and in Philly, bars that do 90%+ of their sales as alcohol and <10% of their sales are food, and that do not allow in anyone under 18, are allowed to have smoking. It looks like a really stupid, complicated law that the lobbyists really got hold of before it passed. Most states' laws are a lot simpler.
I'm just glad my state doesn't permit smoking in places like that, because otherwise I probably just wouldn't play in any poolrooms. I guess there's the student union, but that's about it.
I'm just glad my state doesn't permit smoking in places like that, because otherwise I probably just wouldn't play in any poolrooms. I guess there's the student union, but that's about it.
The average IQ is around 99 surprisingly down from 100 a decade ago. The number of 100 was originally set as an average to measure up and down from but has now oddly slipped a point from what I have read.
Although an IQ of 90 would still have you in the so called normal range it would be quite low with only about 25 to maybe 30% of the public that low.
In most cases public officials are elected by the will of the people but not to exercise the will of the people. If that was the case we would still not have segregation. If you put it to a straight vote today all religions other then the majority religion would be outlawed.
The people can not be trusted to do the right and constitutional thing. They would only interpret laws as they want them to apply based on their own wants and needs. You see it today with amazing attempts to block voting rights.
In Ferguson where the shooting was in the last election only 6% of black people voted meantime they are 67% of the population. Do you think that was an accident?
Do you think it is an accident that they have all white representation on the school board, mayor, cite counsel almost all the police are white. The town is run like a plantation and they keep the blacks in their place. That is what you get when your representatives don't do the right thing.
That is all over there now though. They are getting so organized the next election a white man could not get elected dog catcher. They have awaken a sleeping giant called 67% of the population. They just didn't know it till now.
Ever see a 5 year old walking a 90lb dog? The dog just does what it is told and has no idea it can just bite off the 5 year olds head.
Yes, it sounds like the Clean Indoor Air Act is a violation of that businesses private property rights.
As far as I know they are a private property open to the public not public property. I have no problem with the government governing their own property.
Obviously you and people like you who create these Act's are the problem...you lack the self control and intelligence to make decisions for yourself so you lobby for the government to do it for you at the expense of everyone's free will and freedom.
The state shouldn't decide these things. The open/free market should.
If there is a lack of business for smoking halls then someone should open up a non-smoking hall and rake in the profits. Why should we tear away at someone's good business model because of your personal preference?
- Status