kaznj said:
...I would just like the opinion of some knowledgable people as to whether there is a lot of this or is it mostly a fair game we are betting on.
I have witnessed MANY of the action games at Valley Forge for hours and hours on end. As a matter of fact, when I do attend the SBE, the majority of my time is spent at action table on the lower level.
I am acquainted with MANY of the players who do frequent the action table at Valley Forge. Some of them, I know very well.
The majority of the games of stake at the action table are, in fact, legitimate.
I did hear from other railbirds at the SBE, though, that it was their opinion that some of the action games were "fixed." In other words, the winner was determined by the amount of monies bet on the side. Hypothetically speaking, the contender who had the highest amount bet on him would be the ultimate winner.
Sitting on the sidelines, one can observe quite a bit. Having kept the players' list at this particular action table on multiple occasions, there is no question in my mind that the majority of the names that appeared on the list were shooting pool on the square.
If you enjoy side-betting on the action, my advice would be to observe and then choose your players wisely. IMHO, the majority of players who do frequent the action table are legitimately bringing their best game to the table. It can be a real three-ring circus at the action pit, but when you see a player running a 10-pack, holding the table for as long as he is able to, it may be advantageous to bet on his winning ways.
JAM