I remember speaking with you 9balldiva, I enjoyed meeting you and Robby in Jacksonville. I also had a very good conversation about this with Charlie, and I respect the fact that we have opposing views.
I do not like participating in debates over God's word. We can fill this thread with our opinions and "what we think" until we have 25 pages of arguments and disagreements. That solves nothing. I am well educated on The Bible and I have been teaching it for years. I understand that some people couldn't care less about that. The fact remains that all of us are sinners and we all fall short of the glory of God. Just because I am a Christian and have all of this knowledge does not mean I am immune to sin. It is essential that we remember: God is not as concerned with how much we know as with what we are and how we behave. I fight the spiritual battle every day, and I start every day by getting my knees in prayer. I end every day the same exact way. In between I make a lot of mistakes. Another thing I do every morning is read Ephesians 6. I need my spiritual armour if I am to go into battle.
Gambling is another subject I am familar with as well. It is something that I stay away from because it leads me into a path of other self destructive behaviors. Marissa - brings up slavery. Christ's blood gave us everlasting life. I provided you (Marissa) with some good reading material a few months ago. Please open it up and read it. It will open up your eyes to a new understanding of God's word.
Bible Interpretation
When interpreting the bible, we have to be careful not to make the Bible say what we want it to say. We have to avoid superficial interpretation. We must also bridge some gaps.
The first gap to be bridged is
language. The Bible was not written in English, and some words have been translatd from Latin to Greek, to English with no exact interpretive word. King James did not write the Bible.
The second gap to be bridged is
culture. The Bible was not written last week. It was not written for or by 21st century man. Our cultural comprehension is going to be clouded if we do not have the perspective of someone that lived during the Old Testament. A good 90% of the non-Christian people I have spoken to on Biblical subjects have absolutely no knowledge of why there was a New Testament, and what the New testament did for the Old Testament. This thread proves that as well. Culturally, the Middle East in 900 B.C. is going to be a lot different culturally compared to someone that lives in Cleveland in 2005 A.D., think about it.
The third gap that neds to be bridged is
Geography. That same 90% would be unable to show me on current day map where Biblical history occurred. We are currently at war in a land that has an extensive history in the Bible. Many people are unaware of that.
The fourth gap that needs to be bridged is the
Historical gap. To understand why things are adressed in the New Testament, one must have the knowledge of the Old Testament, which is a very accurate historical record. The Bible must be considered authoritative where it conflicts with other books of ancient history. Even from an antibiblical perspective, the Bible is the most accurate historical record of ancient history available. Archaeology has consistently validated biblical records. Without possessing that historical knowledge, one cannot accurately interpret the meanings of Scripture.God's command for Israel to collect manna as food in the wilderness was obviously not intended to apply later in history.For example, the Old Testament command to love your neighbor (Lev 19:18) still applies today (Rom 13:9; Gal 5:14; James 2:8), but only nine of the Ten Commandments were carried over into the New Testament. Some of the Old Testament commandments were completely nullified, such as the prohibition against eating certain foods (Lev 11 vs. Acts 10:9-16) and the requirement for circumcision (Lev 12 vs. Rom 4 and Gal 5 - 6).
When bridging those gaps, use GOOD sources. Don't use word of mouth. Don't ask soeone that knows less than you, find the correct resources such as a Morris Book Synopsis, A Concordance, or Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary. These books are excellent aids in opening the world of the Bible. They will also guide you through and bridge all of the these 4 gaps.
Thee are also 4 principles that need to be followed as well:
Literal Principle: Understand Scripture in its Literal sense
Historical Principle: What did it mean to the people it was written for?
Grammatical Principle: What does it REALLY say?
Practical Principle: How does it apply to me?
Here is a great link for further reading about on this topic:
http://www.spiritwatch.org/biblestudy4.htm
The following is a passage from When The Enemy Strikes by Charles Stanley. It is a very accurate assessment to the way I view this subject and many others when I hear justifications for different behaviors.
Through the years countless people have told me that they have a different interpretation of a particular verse or passage, and amazingly it's always an interpretation that allows them to believe what they already want to believe so they can live the way they want to live-and the way they want to live is nearly always a way that holds the least amount of pain, effort, self-denial, and discomfort! They have decided that life should be easy and that no decisions should have terrible or eternal negative consequences. Therefore, anything in God's Word that calls upon them to make a difficult choice or a hard decision-and especially anything in God's Word that might spell out a decision related to eternal consequences-is given a "different interpretation."
People sometimes ask me, "What do you believe about... ?" and they'll name a particular topic or question. I respond, "Let's read what God's Word says." I open the Bible and let the person read aloud a particular passage. The person very often remarks, "Well, I know that's what the Bible says, but there are different opinions on what that means."
There's ultimately only one "different opinion," and that's the devil's opinion. When God says, "Thou shalt not," He means, "Thou shalt not." We can try to define shalt and not every which way we know, but the command is still, "Thou shalt not." The only different opinion is, "Thou may," and that includes the provision, "Thou may without any negative consequence." That's the devil's opinion.
If you find yourself having to manipulate the interpretation of a very straightforward commandment of God in order to justify your opinion, you're walking on a slippery path. When God says, "Don't do it," He means, "Don't do it"! He doesn't say, "Only certain people are not to do it," or "Only some of the time will there be a negative consequence if you do this," or "This is My opinion right now about not doing this, but centuries down the line, it will probably be acceptable to do this." No. God's commands are very clear. They are very precise. And they are absolute.
The devil asked Eve, "Has God said... ?" And when that didn't work, he said, "Surely God didn't mean..." He comes at us with the same tactic. He wants us to wonder if God has really spoken on a particular matter. And then if we discover He has, the devil wants us to question God's meaning.
If the devil can get you to misinterpret God's Word that addresses a particular need or situation, he knows that you are just one step closer to yielding to that temptation.
That says it all.
I did not write this to strike up further debate, just to shed light on my views of bible interpretation. If you want to argue or debate, fiind a pastor. LOL. I know some people will reply back to this without investigating or reading all of what I wrote. That's ok too. If you like to gamble, nothing I type in here is going to stop you from doing that if you have your heart set in that direction. Myself, I try to particiapte in activities that bring me closer to God. Gambling is not one of those activites.
Good Luck & God Bless
Blackjack