I will always prefer Brunswick tables to any other. But....
1. I don't like the ball collecting solution on this table. It looks cheap and tacked on
looks like an afterthought. you should be able to put the balls on your side without looking.
I will always prefer Brunswick tables to any other. But....
1. I don't like the ball collecting solution on this table. It looks cheap and tacked on
Stolen from FB:
View attachment 813302
Live reveal:
![]()
343K views · 3.6K reactions | Brunswick Billiards on Reels
www.facebook.com
Oscar hitting a few balls and some closeups of the table:
![]()
28K views · 242 reactions | Brunswick Billiards on Reels
www.facebook.com
Oscar and Savannah interview:
![]()
28K views · 336 reactions | Brunswick Billiards on Reels
www.facebook.com
Nick from Brunswick interview:
![]()
4.7K views · 56 reactions | Brunswick Billiards on Reels
www.facebook.com
Product page (not fully updated yet):
Gold Crown VII
For 180 years, Brunswick Billiards has designed and crafted quality gaming tables for homes and businesses. Find your local Brunswick Billiards dealer today.www.brunswickbilliards.com
No details on construction, pricing, or availability that I could find yet.
2nd best looking table out. Maybe 3rdMr. Sung is a Rasson table.![]()
Someone already mentioned Artemis rubber.Still no updates on Brunswick's site.
My initial impressions:
-It looks great. Still has the GC family history look, but just seems more polished.
-I like the ball trays. They do look a hair out of place, but they look very functional. I never liked the ball tray's in the GC 1-4, because the left and right side were too close together. The 5/6 tray is even worse, just one huge long strip, and it was hard to see what the one hole or banks score was. This wire design just screams "play one pocket or banks on me".
-The triangle holder under the ball return looks a bit weird. But 25 years of the Diamond brand rack holder integrated into the table shows it's a good idea. I hope this GC7 version is not that stupid design that the Chinese tables have where the balls go into the rack, and there is a board under it to bring the balls plus rack onto the table as one unit.
-It does look like the trim pieces and pocket rubber are more flush than the prior GC's, but hard to tell for sure from the videos.
Oscar mentioned in one of the videos the rubber cushions. I pray to the pool gods they did not change the Super Speed formula!!!!
The GCVII uses Artemis cushions.Still no updates on Brunswick's site.
My initial impressions:
-It looks great. Still has the GC family history look, but just seems more polished.
-I like the ball trays. They do look a hair out of place, but they look very functional. I never liked the ball tray's in the GC 1-4, because the left and right side were too close together. The 5/6 tray is even worse, just one huge long strip, and it was hard to see what the one hole or banks score was. This wire design just screams "play one pocket or banks on me".
-The triangle holder under the ball return looks a bit weird. But 25 years of the Diamond brand rack holder integrated into the table shows it's a good idea. I hope this GC7 version is not that stupid design that the Chinese tables have where the balls go into the rack, and there is a board under it to bring the balls plus rack onto the table as one unit.
-It does look like the trim pieces and pocket rubber are more flush than the prior GC's, but hard to tell for sure from the videos.
Oscar mentioned in one of the videos the rubber cushions. I pray to the pool gods they did not change the Super Speed formula!!!!
The GCVII uses Artemis cushions.
God help us!!!!! YUK!!!!!!!The GCVII uses Artemis cushions.
Some older companies get stuck in their ways. I don't understand it either. You have a huge business and your website is crap. You use facebook/social media to advertise. That's alright but why not put it on your site, you know, the place where you can look things up without randomly stumbling on it on social media.I’ll never understand how a company as big as Brunswick would fumble a large product rollout as poorly as this.
You have an actual website. Use it. No information at all worth anything on the website. All the layup questions we all have, which they can predictably know people will ask, nothing of relevance to any of that. No comparison tool. Nothing helpful at all really. Just a joke. But it’s to be expected I guess, doesn’t make it any less frustrating.
I'm sure they are the K55 profile. I wonder how they will play on an aluminum rail.God help us!!!!! YUK!!!!!!!
Our only hope is they are the other ones, not the Intercontinental K55 that Diamond uses.
Intercontinental K66 is a K55 profile. They play very similar to a Superspeed K55 if the table is set up properly to use them.God help us!!!!! YUK!!!!!!!
Our only hope is they are the other ones, not the Intercontinental K55 that Diamond uses.
Yes, that’s the one. They also have a K66 profile that I believe other manufacturers might use.Intercontinental K66 is a K55 profile. They play very similar to a Superspeed K55 if the table is set up properly to use them.
I don't think it has anything to do with the cushion or how it's mounted. It's the stiffness of the rail.Yes, that’s the one. They also have a K66 profile that I believe other manufacturers might use.
If they put on the intercontinental 66 (k55 profile) with the huge nose radius that Diamond uses, I’ll just be in total shock.
I’ll reserve my judgement until playing on one. Maybe they figured out the proper way to mount that cushion.
I disagree. If it was the stiffness of the rail, I think there would be a marked difference when banking a ball near a rail bolt compared to far from a rail bolt. I've also played on many heated 3C tables, and none seemed as bouncy as Diamond rails. Those tables probably have stiffer rails (but I'm not certain).I don't think it has anything to do with the cushion or how it's mounted. It's the stiffness of the rail.