……………………….….
Last edited:
I know it has been beat to death, but Fargorate is a great solution imo. The problem where I live is very few, if any, tournament brackets are posted online and nobody really reports to Fargorate, even leagues. I don’t play league so that wouldn’t help me anyway though. Just about the only way to get an established rating around here is to travel to bigger tournaments out of the state. There are quite a few guys in my area that play in the B+ to A range who aren’t in the system at all. I have a few games in system but only because, once in a blue moon, I still take a road trip and hit an open tournament here and there.
I’ve been trying to talk the owner of my local room into reporting tournament and league results to Fargorate...he just says he’ll look into it. :shrug:
I guess. If I rocked I would not have got beat.
Then again, anyone can dunk on a 9' goal, right?
YOU ROCK!!!! more
First of all I'm not totally against Fargo ratings but they are useless to the average player
If your not a touring pro or a league player they mean nothing and cannot be used to accuratly handicap a tournament
For example I don't know you and you don't know me, let's say you me and my son
are all entered in the same handicapped tournament You said your fargorate is
around 550. Me and my son neither have a fargorate so our rating is 0. Now tell
you would handicap a match between you and either one of us using fargorate
According to fargorate you are 550 points above us which means you are a dead
lock to beat both of us. So where do we get placed in the field of say 64 players?
Exactly I live in KY and I doubt there is 25 players from the state that are ranked accurately
As you say Fargo Ratings would be useless there. But unknown players are not treated as having a 0 rating. They have no rating at all. And FargoRate would have no recommendation for the matchup between the 550 and you or your son.
There IS a mechanism to accommodate players without a rating, though for people who choose to use it. If the TD thinks you play similar to players rated 500 and your son plays similar to players rated 600, then these guesses can be used before you have a Fargo Rating. As you play in a few tournaments and collect games this guess is being adjusted/informed by the results and you have what is called a preliminary rating (not a Fargo Rating.) Once you have 200 games the original guess is ignored and you have a Fargo Rating.
If he ran out the only 3 games he had to win, obviously his handicap was way off. Someone getting a 6 game spot in a race to 9 even against a very good player like yourself, shouldn't be able to make more than 3-4 balls in a row, once in a while. Don't blame the player - blame the TD!Exactly. Most of the tournaments local to me are 90% nut hunters. I refuse to play like that.
The guy that owns the room says it's a good event. Lol....he does not have a clue about pool or bow tournaments should be run. All the non-practicing players LOVE handicapped tournaments.
With handicapped tourneys they don't need to practice. As a matter of fact, if they play worse this week they get moved down......then they win the next tournament.
I had to give a guy 9 / 3 and I played this guy a few weeks earlier in private and barely beat him giving him the call 7 in ten ball.
This is how our match went:
Game 1, He won flip, broke, ran all but dogged the 9.....i pocket 9 and win. Score 1/0
Game 2, I string 4 racks. Score 5/0
Game 6, I break dry he runs out. 5/1
Game 7, he breaks, runs couple balls and shoots a nut up safe, I kick and hit it but he out. Score 5/2
Game 8, he breaks and runs out.
Match over score 5/3 in race where I go to 9 and he goes to 3.
Yeah, handicapped tournaments are awesome
That's it, I lose.
I guess I'm not a gambler, as I don't consider a $200 race to 5 as a cheap set. What are you comparing it to I guess is the question? For pro level players, I guess you're correct. For most of us here though, I'm assuming that would not be considered a cheap set.Mike, what described above happened to me.
TD....witnessed me playing sky in Huntsville AL, a few years ago. It was cheap match for around a $200 for a very short set....i think to 5.
Long story short, sky played well, but I got a few (understatement) great rolls that enabled me to win the race. Remember, it was a cheap match. I'm sure it meant more to me than sky. I had to ask him to play three or four times before he accepted. It was not really worth his time but he finally agreed.
My point:
Following week, I enter a tournament in that area and the TD (same TD) entered me WAY higher than I should have been.
He later realized that he made a mistake but it was to late at that point.
He told me unless I got out often and played in tournaments that were rated I would most likely be done like that again. So, for players like myself that rarely leave their home, it sucks butt I understand that it has to be that way or the complete opposite can happen.
If he ran out the only 3 games he had to win, obviously his handicap was way off. Someone getting a 6 game spot in a race to 9 even against a very good player like yourself, shouldn't be able to make more than 3-4 balls in a row, once in a while. Don't blame the player - blame the TD!
As you say Fargo Ratings would be useless there. But unknown players are not treated as having a 0 rating. They have no rating at all. And FargoRate would have no recommendation for the matchup between the 550 and you or your son.
There IS a mechanism to accommodate players without a rating, though for people who choose to use it. If the TD thinks you play similar to players rated 500 and your son plays similar to players rated 600, then these guesses can be used before you have a Fargo Rating. As you play in a few tournaments and collect games this guess is being adjusted/informed by the results and you have what is called a preliminary rating (not a Fargo Rating.) Once you have 200 games the original guess is ignored and you have a Fargo Rating.
You are almost surrounded
States in blue have 100 or more player with established ratings
I guess I'm not a gambler, as I don't consider a $200 race to 5 as a cheap set. What are you comparing it to I guess is the question? For pro level players, I guess you're correct. For most of us here though, I'm assuming that would not be considered a cheap set.
No, everyone cant dunk on a 9' basket.
Goals are on the ground.
Pool players...hmmmph.
I guess I'm not a gambler, as I don't consider a $200 race to 5 as a cheap set. What are you comparing it to I guess is the question? For pro level players, I guess you're correct. For most of us here though, I'm assuming that would not be considered a cheap set.
OK, I understand now and I agree - certainly a $200 set is considered a "cheap" set for a highly ranked pro player trying to make a living playing pool, and he may not be willing to play for anything less. I was just making the point that it would not be considered a "cheap" set for most of us.As far as $200 being a cheap set, well, he would not play for anything less. I have played several pros, won some and lost some. Most every pro I've played wanted to play for more and for short sets of 5 to 7 as they do not want to spend more time than needed to "make money".....after all, that is their job.
I would love to play him even everyday for couple hours a day for $20 to $30 a set race to 9 or 11 but I'm pretty sure he would laugh at the thought of that, as the $$$ amount at the end of day wouldn't add up to make it worthwhile.
As for what "is cheap", well, everyone's cheap is a different number depending on the situation at the time.
Rake
OK, I understand now and I agree - certainly a $200 set is considered a "cheap" set for a highly ranked pro player trying to make a living playing pool, and he may not be willing to play for anything less. I was just making the point that it would not be considered a "cheap" set for most of us.