Help Identifying cues

GDD1966

New member
I inherited these two cues, and all I know about them is that they are at least 15 years old. I can't find any markings on either of them. Anybody recognize them?
unmarked.jpg
unmarked 2.jpg
 
Your titlist conversion cue could very well be a very early Richard Helmstetter made cue. there is a post made by member manwon from march 26 2010 that shows the cue. the other one, I do not know. The Helmstetter would most likely be from the 60's. May be a Gandy as well. Better picture of joint pin and a photo of the very bottom may help.
 
Your titlist conversion cue could very well be a very early Richard Helmstetter made cue. there is a post made by member manwon from march 26 2010 that shows the cue. the other one, I do not know. The Helmstetter would most likely be from the 60's. May be a Gandy as well. Better picture of joint pin and a photo of the very bottom may help.

Gandy is a good guess, they used very similar rings. Usually when I see those rings, Gandy is a good go-to for a guess. Viking is a bit similar also.
The top cue with the dots in the points is a bit interesting, would need some better pictures of it overall, it looks like something good at some areas but some others say "cheap import". Something about the wood grain seems fake, like an overlay or paint vs natural wood grain.
 
Gandy is a good guess, they used very similar rings. Usually when I see those rings, Gandy is a good go-to for a guess. Viking is a bit similar also.
The top cue with the dots in the points is a bit interesting, would need some better pictures of it overall, it looks like something good at some areas but some others say "cheap import". Something about the wood grain seems fake, like an overlay or paint vs natural wood grain.
The first cue does have an odd look but it could just be a lighting/finish thing. I just worked on an old Huebler that looks like a similar wood and was hoping someone could identify the wood used. The difference between the original finish, no finish, and a new finish was striking. So it could be real just the image might look off.

A8541139-208E-4BF2-89FD-5256D9E1A989.jpeg

B10EFDA0-599B-4EED-82E4-0DBF3404A73C.jpeg


16263532-BAF5-482F-9CE1-23C5EB327FCE.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Thanks for all the thoughts, truly appreciated. SSDIVER2112, that Huebler looks nice!
Here are some more detailed pics; would love to hear additional thoughts.
 

Attachments

  • Cue 1 - 1.jpg
    Cue 1 - 1.jpg
    162.1 KB · Views: 113
  • Cue 1 - 2.jpg
    Cue 1 - 2.jpg
    205.6 KB · Views: 127
  • Cue 1 - 3.jpg
    Cue 1 - 3.jpg
    215.5 KB · Views: 118
  • Cue 1 - 4.jpg
    Cue 1 - 4.jpg
    207.7 KB · Views: 125
  • Cue 1 - 5.jpg
    Cue 1 - 5.jpg
    180.6 KB · Views: 119
  • Cue 2 - 1.jpg
    Cue 2 - 1.jpg
    211.5 KB · Views: 131
  • Cue 2 - 2.jpg
    Cue 2 - 2.jpg
    163.6 KB · Views: 114
  • Cue 2 - 3.jpg
    Cue 2 - 3.jpg
    152.2 KB · Views: 120
  • Cue 2 - 4.jpg
    Cue 2 - 4.jpg
    181.3 KB · Views: 129
  • Cue 2 - 5.jpg
    Cue 2 - 5.jpg
    74.5 KB · Views: 126
The full splice cue looks like it was made from a cheap blank, you can see in the dots, the builder often puts the dots there if they need to fill in gaps in the build of the connection. That one may be hard to find the maker of, could be any number of random cue makers, someone's wood worker uncle making a cue, something along those lines.
 
Back
Top