I dunno if quartersawn or flatsawn makes a difference but the quartersawn squares I got from one supplier were much better than those "stress-relieved" baseball bat quality blanks from one other supplier. 

k-carson said:well to make a long story short the wood available isnt as good as back then
the trees back then grew in the forest competeing with other big trees for water and sunshine , they grew slower and more dense
much of the wood being sold now is from trees that were planted on the
bare ground after they went through and harvested all the timber
those seedlings grew very fast due to no other big trees blocking sun and
sucking all the nutrients and water from the soil
Scott Behrens said:Whether a shaft came from a flatsawn, quartersawn, rift cut, face cut, or any other type of miling makes no difference once the shaft has been turned round. Although it will make a difference to furniture makers and other woodworkers.
Scott
Scott Behrens said:Suppliers who sell quartersawn material may carrier a bit higher grade of material because they are probably more particular, but if you have the chance to sort it out yourself, then you can pick the good stuff no matter what they've got.
cuesmith said:This topic came up in a conversation I had with Boone Bell, of Bell Forest Products, (a supplier of quality maple to lots of cuemakers) last week at the SBE. He agreed with me that the wood itself is the same, once it's in a dowell form, BUT, where it does come into play is in the cutting of the turning squares. The quartersawn boards are much easier to get the grain aligned properly. You can see the straightness of the grain better in QS maple boards so it can be cut along the grain, not across the grain, which results in grain runout and usually a warped shaft. Once it's in a dowell, it's no longer quarter sawn!
Sherm
Arnot Wadsworth said:I would be interested to know how a piece of wood that was quarter-sawn becomes un-quarter-sawn when it is turned round?
Canadian cue said:So if there is a distinct difference between the two then if someone showed you two shafts with equall amount of growth rings and straight in grain you could tell how the board it came from was cut?
mjantti said:Am I right about cuemakers being really careful about telling who's their wood supplier ? The cue construction may have some trade secrets involved but I've heard the wood supplier is another trade secret...
Arnot Wadsworth said:Logs are tapered. There is a big end and a little end. If you do not first cut the logs down the center all the boards that result will cross the grain in two directions. That is where the feathers come from in lots of shaftwood. That is why some shaftwood is much cheaper than other shaftwood. Flat-sawn shaftwood crosses the grain in two directions. Flat-sawn wood is not suitable for shaftwood. You will find flat-sawn shaftwood in cheap cues. Turning the stock round does not eliminate grain run-out it just makes it harder for to see.
Quarter-sawing starts with centering the log on the carriage. It is then ripped down the center. You now have two halves. Each half is then centered on the carriage and ripped down the center. Now you see two flat surfaces like 1/4th of a pie. The flats are placed down and against the head blocks and the boards are cut off one at a time in 1 inch thickness. These boards do not cross the grain in either direction. The grain is level all the way through from one end to the other provided the log was perfectly straight. If the log was not perfectly straight to start with you will see some grain “run-out”. The boards with run-out should be culled out and not used for shaftwood.
Yes, quartersawn lumber is far superior to flatsawn when you are dealing with flat boards.Arnot Wadsworth said:Quarter-sawn lumber has always been in demand where optimum strength is required. It has been used in airplanes and automobile frames.
Essentially, all shafts should be the equivalent of quartersawn once you are done, depending upon how you look at it, if you have turned them properly. Whether the shaft came from quartersawn or flatsawn lumber, all shafts have two sides that are equivalent to quartersawn and two sides equivalent to flat sawn. I 100% agree that anything with run-out should be pitched.Arnot Wadsworth said:The boards that result from quarter-sawing are usually cut in 31 inch lengths and then cut into 1x1 turning squares. Any square that reveals grain run-out should be culled at this time although many are not.
Scott Behrens said:You are correct in saying that grain runout can be a problem, but it is not caused by using flatsawn lumber, it is caused by selecting boards that were cheaply milled. Flatsawn lumber can be milled with the growth of tree just as quartersawn can be (There is quartersawn lumber out there with grain runout from improper milling also). Anyone planning to make any shaft should be careful with their selection of lumber.
Yes, quartersawn lumber is far superior to flatsawn when you are dealing with flat boards.
Essentially, all shafts should be the equivalent of quartersawn once you are done, depending upon how you look at it, if you have turned them properly. Whether the shaft came from quartersawn or flatsawn lumber, all shafts have two sides that are equivalent to quartersawn and two sides equivalent to flat sawn. I 100% agree that anything with run-out should be pitched.
The key to this is to select the right lumber, and if getting quartersawn lumber helps you do that, then by all means do it, but if you have the opportunity to sort through stuff with your own eyes and know what you are doing, you can put in a bit more time and save a fair amount of money with flatsawn lumber.
Scott
Arnot Wadsworth said:I would be interested to know how a piece of wood that was quarter-sawn becomes un-quarter-sawn when it is turned round?
The wood I buy from Boone Bell is quarter-sawn.
TheBook said:What part of the tree produces the best wood? Wouldn't the wood closer to the core produce growth rings that would have a smaller arc that the piece at the near the outside and does this affect shaft quality?
RSB-Refugee said:First let me say I don't know the answer to this question, but it popped into my mind and I wonder what you all think.
When a log go's to mill, if it is not straight, is it worth trying to quarter-saw it? I was thinking to plain-saw a straight log is wasting potential profit and to quarter-saw would be a waste of time. So here is the question, 'Is wood, better because it is quarter-sawn, or quarter-sawn, because it is better wood?'.
I agree once it is round you really can't tell, unless there is run-out present. I have heard this said by many very reputable sources. I have an open mind on this one, but have yet to be convinced otherwise.
Tracy
Let me give you an example of why this is true. Several years ago almost no one had even heard of a small company called "Pieces of Eight." I mention them now only because their mill burned down and they never rebuilt. I was one of their first customers and had a sweet deal with them. He would send me bundles of shafts and let me grade through them and keep what I wanted and send the rest back with a check. Best deal I ever had on shaft wood.mjantti said:Am I right about cuemakers being really careful about telling who's their wood supplier ? The cue construction may have some trade secrets involved but I've heard the wood supplier is another trade secret...