I don't know the years these 2 factors played. But for some time he had horrible pain from kidney stones and went through a divorce. I'm not sure which was more painful...
I would venture to guess that outside stresses have more to do with a persons focus on pool than does anything. If Earl is at a place in his life where he's feeling content about everything else in general, then his pool game could improve dramatically. And for any person at that level or near, an improvement is no small matter.
The scary part is, Earl could be another 100% better if he could stay focused. The skills are there, that's beyond dispute. But the desire (and the external drive) simply isn't there. I don't know what it takes to flip Earl's switch on to full throttle, but I feel bad for whoever figures out what that is.
EDIT: sorry, I should have said mid 00s-2010
What did he do to revive his game? He wasn't bad those years but I'd take todays Earl any day over that era's Earl.
Its the same with Archer, why cant he win? He was the best at one time right? What happened? Did the game change, no.
He cant keep it together against the Big Boys anymore? Is it focus? Desire? heart?
I would venture to guess that outside stresses have more to do with a persons focus on pool than does anything. If Earl is at a place in his life where he's feeling content about everything else in general, then his pool game could improve dramatically. And for any person at that level or near, an improvement is no small matter.
The scary part is, Earl could be another 100% better if he could stay focused. The skills are there, that's beyond dispute. But the desire (and the external drive) simply isn't there. I don't know what it takes to flip Earl's switch on to full throttle, but I feel bad for whoever figures out what that is.
Its the same with Archer, why cant he win? He was the best at one time right? What happened? Did the game change, no.
He cant keep it together against the Big Boys anymore? Is it focus? Desire? heart?
The olden days players didnt need to be perfect when they played other top pros. The pockets were bigger the high level players fewer. The proof is in the statistics. Watch the old matches even with giant pockets and ez to hold shape slow cloth, they missed hangers. What makes earl better today is necessity. The 4 minute mile was broken finally and all of a sudden everyone could do it. Earl got in good physical shape and practices. I think Johnny Archer like a lot of american pros is a golfer now isn't he? At 58, I still compete and am better now than ever because I want to win in today's competitive environment. Earl is not resting on his laurels.Earl was at his best in the 80's and 90's. Still played good in the early 2000's, but not as good. At his best he was stringing racks (5-7 racks was average!) in every match and made it look like he was practicing. He was the only guy I ever saw who made a 9' table look like a bar table. And he rarely missed a ball!
Earl today makes many more errors and misses far more frequently. You can't win making mistakes like that against today's top players. Sad to say for all the Earl fans, but they would eat him alive in Asia. Give him a dose of today's Chinese players and he might crawl in a hole somewhere. Earl still looks good on some racks, but he is not consistent anymore. He would be a third tier pro in The Philippines, on a par with many of the local hustlers. And that's being generous.
I will say this for him, like Efren he still shows brilliance from time to time, like last year's DCC One Pocket division. But those times are few and far between.
Earl today makes many more errors and misses far more frequently. You can't win making mistakes like that against today's top players.
I honestly do not see anyone fascination with Earl, his antics, as if Earl was in another sport he would be benched, booted, banned, or forced to act in compliance with rules of conduct or behavior.
JMHO
Disagree. Almost all sports have players who act like Earl, and in all of those sports the spotlight is on them. I don't necessarily think that's a good thing, but it's certainly not something unique to pool.
I seem to recall watching an interview with him where he claimed that playing with a Cuetec ruined his game. QUOTE]
Yeah, that Cuetec really screwed him up. He was ONLY able to run 11 racks in a row with it when he won the Million Dollar Challenge.
If he had used a Szamboti he may still be running them.
Aloha.
Earl was at his best in the 80's and 90's. Still played good in the early 2000's, but not as good. At his best he was stringing racks (5-7 racks was average!) in every match and made it look like he was practicing. He was the only guy I ever saw who made a 9' table look like a bar table. And he rarely missed a ball!
Earl today makes many more errors and misses far more frequently. You can't win making mistakes like that against today's top players. Sad to say for all the Earl fans, but they would eat him alive in Asia. Give him a dose of today's Chinese players and he might crawl in a hole somewhere. Earl still looks good on some racks, but he is not consistent anymore. He would be a third tier pro in The Philippines, on a par with many of the local hustlers. And that's being generous.
I will say this for him, like Efren he still shows brilliance from time to time, like last year's DCC One Pocket division. But those times are few and far between.