ok, your determined to do it that way and i will go through that honestly and expect honesty back in return, agreed? i will be back later.
How Fractional Aiming Systems Help
- Thread starter Patrick Johnson
- Start date
ok, your determined to do it that way and i will go through that honestly and expect honesty back in return, agreed? i will be back later.
And you didn't remember that simple thing from the video?????????
Let's be direct here, Stan. I innocently posted a response to your request for example shots and you tried to turn that into an opportunity to attack my credibility. You were the bad guy - no implying needed.
pj
chgo
give up PJ you dropped the ball 
you pretty much outed yourself in a lot of ways in that exchange. Your comprehension seems to be as bad as your cte knowledge. I actually felt a little embarrassed for you there, you hung yourself out to dry and watching you try and squirm back was also embarrassing.
"You Reap What You Sow" and there is a lesson to be learned here
I also don't think i can take you seriously in these cte discussions any longer. so go a head pick a line or two out of this post and have fun.
the exchange is still there for everyone to read so if i were you, i would drop the twist your trying to do now or it will just get even more embarrassing for yourself
you pretty much outed yourself in a lot of ways in that exchange. Your comprehension seems to be as bad as your cte knowledge. I actually felt a little embarrassed for you there, you hung yourself out to dry and watching you try and squirm back was also embarrassing. "You Reap What You Sow" and there is a lesson to be learned here
I also don't think i can take you seriously in these cte discussions any longer. so go a head pick a line or two out of this post and have fun.
the exchange is still there for everyone to read so if i were you, i would drop the twist your trying to do now or it will just get even more embarrassing for yourself
Last edited:
Good grief, PJ! I have never seen such spin....pitiful
You submitted shots for me to solve that were on my DVD and you did not know that.
I don't blame you for being embarassed. You should known those shots were on my DVD. You positioned yourself for a review for 1000s to see. The bottom line is that you did not fo yout job as a reviewer.
Stop your twisting of what actually happen.
Stan
You submitted shots for me to solve that were on my DVD and you did not know that.
I don't blame you for being embarassed. You should known those shots were on my DVD. You positioned yourself for a review for 1000s to see. The bottom line is that you did not fo yout job as a reviewer.
Stop your twisting of what actually happen.
Stan
Neil, I am well aware of Pj's antics and this little deal just punctuates the fact that he did not do a proper study of my DVD before his review.
Stan
Stan
Innocently posting? HA -- you were trying to trap Stan's nuts and then outed yourself that you didn't even look at the DVD in the process. Everyone who studied the info on the DVD knows this exact example was covered in detail.
Spin it however you like--- it is what it is. Proves what your DVD review was worth--- probably the same as Lou's.
it constantly amazes me how these guys that don't know the system and could not figure it out, or use it for a couple spot shots or have seen some info off dr daves site try and tell users of the system how the system works. They come up with the most ridiculous things in some of these posts over and over again...if we were in school they would have gotten a F as in Fail! and then they argue with the people that passed, i dont get it?
Last edited:
Neil,
He gets it all right. The thing is, now everyone can see that Patrick really does have an agenda. Calling Stan a "slickster" is just more of that agenda, coming out. They do it in little dribs and drabs but anyone who follows what Patrick says can plainly see that he has an agenda and it's really sad. For a while there, he had me believing that he was indeed interested in learning how CTE/Pro1 works so well.:nono::nono::nono:
JoeyA i have said this a year ago, he has spent 15-20 years of his life posting against cte to the pool world and we both know the pool world is a huge part of his life. That number is much to big for him to go back on now, with the type of personality he has and all the people he trashed along the way.He will fight this to the end and you can see it with his selective answering and the spins and twist and the repetition of the same thing over and over again. this is what puts me on tilt in these threads, i think im the only who sees this?
Last edited:
I seem to have the whole CTE Protection League occupied here. Somebody in another thread must be talking about CTE without proper supervision!
pj
chgo
there isn't no anti cte protection league coming around you right now, they have left you behind enemy lines all alone lol :thumbup:
Care to explain why Stan would attack something that never existed?
pj
chgo
P.S. This has been a barrel of monkeys as usual (literally), but I think I'll let you guys play amongst yourselves until your nap times.
Pj, I never attacked anything concerning you.
You reviewed my DVD under the pretense of fair and square.
If you had viewed my DVD properly you would not overlooked Dr. Dave's 3 heralded shots because solutions have been sought for quite some time.
Stan
You reviewed my DVD under the pretense of fair and square.
If you had viewed my DVD properly you would not overlooked Dr. Dave's 3 heralded shots because solutions have been sought for quite some time.
Stan
You're doing it right here. Saying my review was "under the pretense of fair and square" is an attack on my credibility.
I said I'd let you guys play by yourselves, but I think that's a pretty basic misrepresentation of yourself that you should understand is pretty obvious to others.
pj
chgo
Pj, you made it abundantly clear that you do not and did not know the contents of my DVD of which you have purported to be knowledgable about.
I did not attack. I DEFENDED and I was right to defend.
Others can see that as well.
Stan
I did not attack. I DEFENDED and I was right to defend.
Others can see that as well.
Stan