Synthetic shafts are absolutely nothing new.
Predator has only done 2 thing with theirs....
1. Made it low deflection like their wood shafts.
2. Gave it a wood-like surface texture to glide smoothly.
There's zero reason why this shaft would be any more "accurate" than any other synthetic shaft from the past. And, compared to wood - I doubt the "accuracy" margin - presumably obtained via increased material consistency over wood -- would be beyond the margin of error for pocketing any kind of shot anywhere on the table.
The pros are -
Warp proof
Ding resistant
Less effected by climate conditions
Feel consistency from REVO to REVO, assuming tips are the same, broken in the same amount....
Also, ideally they should all weigh the same within a very, very tight margin. But based on reports on this forum, they do not. Which is a big let down.
Either people's scales have too much error, or vary too much from one to another - or Predator's quality control is lacking.
If material density is same and consistent, and you have the same length shaft, with the same taper, and the same tapped hole diameter and depth, you should have almost exactly the same material volume -- the shafts should all weight the same within much less than 1/10 of an ounce.
Many wood shafts are around or within a 1/10...I'd expect the use of synthetics to be more consistent.
Predator has only done 2 thing with theirs....
1. Made it low deflection like their wood shafts.
2. Gave it a wood-like surface texture to glide smoothly.
There's zero reason why this shaft would be any more "accurate" than any other synthetic shaft from the past. And, compared to wood - I doubt the "accuracy" margin - presumably obtained via increased material consistency over wood -- would be beyond the margin of error for pocketing any kind of shot anywhere on the table.
The pros are -
Warp proof
Ding resistant
Less effected by climate conditions
Feel consistency from REVO to REVO, assuming tips are the same, broken in the same amount....
Also, ideally they should all weigh the same within a very, very tight margin. But based on reports on this forum, they do not. Which is a big let down.
Either people's scales have too much error, or vary too much from one to another - or Predator's quality control is lacking.
If material density is same and consistent, and you have the same length shaft, with the same taper, and the same tapped hole diameter and depth, you should have almost exactly the same material volume -- the shafts should all weight the same within much less than 1/10 of an ounce.
Many wood shafts are around or within a 1/10...I'd expect the use of synthetics to be more consistent.