These drills are always BIH. Would you rely on another poster's starting position to plan an entire runout? Hell no, even if it was Efren.
Where did he start? Nuther mystery, what's the toughest starting position you can still get out?These drills are always BIH. Would you rely on another poster's starting position to plan an entire runout? Hell no, even if it was Efren.
You can, just depends on the angle you leave yourself. I think Maha is right, all those shots are basically the same. About a 40 degree angle on each with a different speed on the last ones that need greater distance.Not really. You aren't getting from the 5 to th 6 with low outside.
What is your percentage?You can, just depends on the angle you leave yourself. I think Maha is right, all those shots are basically the same. About a 40 degree angle on each with a different speed on the last ones that need greater distance.
My take on these drills is if you are unable to do this runout at a high percent, and the reason is stroke inaccuracy, which it probably is, then we should step back and concentrate on getting that stroke down to the 1 mm accuracy that Mark Wilson refers to. Isolate the issue and work mostly on that issue.
I haven’t tried it yet, although it’s basically a modified Bert Kinister drill that I have been doing for years. When I get off work tomorrow I’ll give you answer on that %.What is your percentage?
I struggled with the speed control in the beginning. I just tried it again and got 5/10.
One position error and you're off to the races.
lol. nobody in this thread is doing that. You can take ball in hand on the 4 and still not getting out with low outside on the 5 to 6. "you" is not you personally.You can, just depends on the angle you leave yourself. I think Maha is right, all those shots are basically the same. About a 40 degree angle on each with a different speed on the last ones that need greater distance.
My take on these drills is if you are unable to do this runout at a high percent, and the reason is stroke inaccuracy, which it probably is, then we should step back and concentrate on getting that stroke down to the 1 mm accuracy that Mark Wilson refers to. Isolate the issue and work mostly on that issue.
I’m not speaking for everyone. I just backed up what MAHA stated in that all these shots can be made fairly easily with varying degrees of low, outside. The only time I would use anything different is if I overrun position and get too straight in.lol. nobody in this thread is doing that. You can take ball in hand on the 4 and still not getting out with low outside on the 5 to 6. "you" is not you personally.
Going rail to rail 5 to 6 is fundamental; forward or backward. IOW low outside coming back at you and dying on the third rail or just inside english and going forward for the mirror image. There should be no issue with that except those irrelevant percentages - which only speak to individual competence. No can? It's not magic. Break it down and learn.lol. nobody in this thread is doing that. You can take ball in hand on the 4 and still not getting out with low outside on the 5 to 6. "you" is not you personally.
I know how to play. And I can run out. The whole discussion was specifically about going from the 5 to the 6. And it is unlikely that anyone is going to get the perfect shape every time to play the 5 with low outside to get on the 6.Going rail to rail 5 to 6 is fundamental; forward or backward. IOW low outside coming back at you and dying on the third rail or just inside english and going forward for the mirror image. There should be no issue with that except those irrelevant percentages - which only speak to individual competence. No can? It's not magic. Break it down and learn.
Fairly easy? I don't think so. You are going to miss position and have to play something else. That was/is my point.I’m not speaking for everyone. I just backed up what MAHA stated in that all these shots can be made fairly easily with varying degrees of low, outside. The only time I would use anything different is if I overrun position and get too straight in.
Edit: this is basically a low outside drill.
Part of the drill _is_ position. How perfect is 30 degrees give or take 10, 20 degrees?I know how to play. And I can run out. The whole discussion was specifically about going from the 5 to the 6. And it is unlikely that anyone is going to get the perfect shape every time to play the 5 with low outside to get on the 6.
perfect in this example is the angle necessary to play low outside to get from the 5 to the 6. Maybe 30 +/- 5. otherwise you want to shoot something else or position is difficult.Part of the drill _is_ position. How perfect is 30 degrees give or take 10, 20 degrees?
You are correct there. Mental geometry is not a strong suit.perfect in this example is the angle necessary to play low outside to get from the 5 to the 6. Maybe 30 +/- 5. otherwise you want to shoot something else or position is difficult.
After seeing yours I had the balls way too close to the rail. I thought it said 1/4" off. I can't readIMO, not even a pro would have the same shot from ball to ball. Ball rolls a hair more or less, or angle slightly higher or lower, and the out is completely different. Plus, having done it now 3 sessions, I don't think the same angle on each shot is even the best way to get out, even if you had BIH on each of the 6 shots.
Here are 3 of my outs from the other day. All the dead space is cut out, 2 min total length.