Well said
I don't like how people are jumping down on Neil for calling this a tough safe. I wanna see any one put this shot on a diamond set up exactly how it is and have the results they estimate. It's too tough to get the 1 to stop from leaking out and coming back up with rails as bouncy as the ones on Jude's table in question. If its a slow table maybe but the angle doesn't lay right. You have to use the rails to your advantage and choose one of the other options which create distance or lock the cue ball up using another ball. IMO.
The one's position is at about 1.7 diamonds. The position of the five is at about .8 diamonds. To get this safety, therefore, you need to follow the cue ball apporiximately one foot while not hitting the one hard enough for it to travel more than two and a half feet, which would a guarantee a see on it. It takes more than a slow roll to get that much follow. At very least, I'd call it difficult to pull this one off, and I'd guess it's a twenty to one shot that a "C" player would pull it off on the first attempt.
I don't like how people are jumping down on Neil for calling this a tough safe. I wanna see any one put this shot on a diamond set up exactly how it is and have the results they estimate. It's too tough to get the 1 to stop from leaking out and coming back up with rails as bouncy as the ones on Jude's table in question. If its a slow table maybe but the angle doesn't lay right. You have to use the rails to your advantage and choose one of the other options which create distance or lock the cue ball up using another ball. IMO.